Are you looking to add Container Security to your arsenal of tools? Maybe for your business or personal use only, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to know more about the most important Container Security statistics of 2024.
My team and I scanned the entire web and collected all the most useful Container Security stats on this page. You don’t need to check any other resource on the web for any Container Security statistics. All are here only š
How much of an impact will Container Security have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your business? Should you invest in Container Security? We will answer all your Container Security related questions here.
Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any word. š
On this page, you’ll learn about the following:
Best Container Security Statistics
ā° Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 101 Container Security Statistics on this page šContainer Security Benefits Statistics
- To help accelerate adoption and more quickly reap the benefits of containers, the study cites that 65% of tech leaders are turning to third party platforms for container management. [0]
Container Security Usage Statistics
- This year, Go has shot up in usage from 14% to 66%. [1]
Container Security Market Statistics
- With market penetration for containers predicted to hit 90% within the year, it is fair to say that containers represent both opportunity and challenge. [2]
- Developers focus most on innovation(66%), valuing the quick responses to market changes (64%). [3]
Container Security Software Statistics
- They see improved software quality (61%) as the highest business value of containers, and enhancing security (72%). [3]
Container Security Adoption Statistics
- The adoption rate for signing container images has not changed and remains around 10%. [4]
- We also see a dramatic increase of 300% in the adoption of Falco, as users turn to open source solutions to address their security concerns. [1]
- To help accelerate adoption and more quickly reap the benefits of containers, the study cites that 65% of tech leaders are turning to third party platforms for container management. [0]
Container Security Latest Statistics
- (completion rate of 52%) with an average completion time of a little over ten minutes. [4]
- It’s great to see more than 50% of the responses from folks that are in a Site Reliability Engineering/DevOps role. [4]
- What stands out compared to 2019 is that the number of people responding that they do not scan their container images dropped from 38% to 24.8%,. [4]
- First, the number of people not scanning decreased from 83% to 70%, and second, we see CNCF Falco , Twistlock , as well as Aqua Security gaining traction. [4]
- The percentage of folks who say they do not encrypt sensitive data decreased slightly from 11% last year to 9.7% this year. [4]
- The majority of 89% are not signing their container images, yet. [4]
- Concerning supply chain management, we see a little surprising, but this could be due to the sample size last year that still the majority does not do it (93%, up from 81%). [4]
- Next, we focused on Kubernetes which more than 77% of the participants say they are using in one form or the other. [4]
- Overall, we see a bit more than a third not yet using network policies, followed by Calico (35% in 2020, 60% in 2019), service meshes (21.8% in 2020, 33% in 2019), and Cilium (10%, up from 0% last year). [4]
- While the overall picture is stable, some 15% said they intend to skip PSPs in favor of an alternative such as the CNCF OPA subproject Gatekeeper. [4]
- As in 2019 the case, the AWSnative solution IAM roles for service accounts is the most often used solution (54%, up from 43% in 2019), followed by node level IAM roles (21% in 2020, down from 25% in 2019), and (14% in 2020, down from 20% in 2019). [4]
- While it’s great to see that the trend to migrate to podlevel role management is a positive one, we still need to invest more work to get the remaining 20%+ who’re assigning IAM roles to nodes rather to adopt pod. [4]
- Aside from the really exciting finding that 60% of those containers are running NGINX, Sysdig uncovered some fairly troubling security stats. [5]
- Consider this one 54% of containers lived fewer than five minutes. [5]
- In 2018, that was true of only 20%. [5]
- If that doesn’t bother you, try this stat even though 60% of container images are pulled from private registries , 52% of those fail image scans. [5]
- Our forthcoming 2020 State of Application Services report found that cloud native/microservices comprise on average 15% of an enterprise app portfolio. [5]
- Lack of compliance certifications for containers 41%. [6]
- Privacy violations from using shared resources 40% Security of data stored in containers 38% Unauthorized access to containers 38% Patching/updating containers 35% Vulnerabilities in container images 34%. [6]
- 32% Spread of malware among containers 31%. [6]
- Hereās what we learned from surveying SMBs and mid tier enterprises about how they are using containers today 42% of respondents said that they have already deployed containerized product applications. [2]
- 23% plan to deploy containerized apps over the next year. [2]
- 22% plan to start testing containers over the same timeframe. [2]
- It means that about 90% of respondents will be using containers in some way within the next year. [2]
- Impressively, this represents a growth rate of more than 100% yearto. [2]
- Our survey revealed that 94% of respondents believe containers have security implications. [2]
- Nearly one third of respondents (31%). [2]
- Another 28% are concerned that a single infected container could easily spread to others, while 16% identified the portability of containers as a reason why they could be more susceptible to āin motionā compromise. [2]
- 44% of respondents ā organizations ā admitted to delaying deployment because of security concerns. [7]
- From the surveyed organizations and professionals, the results indicate that 94% have had to deal with a security incident of some description in the last 12 months. [7]
- When the same study was completed in the Spring of 2019, 34% of respondents said that their container strategy wasnāt detailed enough. [7]
- In this edition, that number dropped to 22%, with details about how to secure the containerized environment among the most extensively discussed. [7]
- 34% of respondents rate their security strategy as intermediate ā i.e. advanced enough to mitigate most security threats ā with 14% already reaching a mature state. [7]
- Plus, a significant 29% of respondents have more than 50% of their solutions running as cloud native appsānearly twice the number from Fall 2018. [7]
- Attacks, on the other hand, arenāt viewed as a significant security threat, with only 12% of respondents showing legitimate concerns. [7]
- Vulnerabilities are also not seen as a source of significant worry, with only 27% of respondents signaling concerns. [7]
- And if that’s not enough, 78% of respondents trust AWS to support their apps. [7]
- Accordingly, the top 5 most popular container orchestration tools are Amazon EKS ā 37%. [7]
- For example, we can see that 74% of organizations are scanning container images in the build process. [1]
- However, if we look at the runtime scanning data, we see that the majority of images are still overly permissive with 58% of containers running as root. [1]
- 74% of our customers are scanning pre. [1]
- What we see is that 58% of images are running as root, allowing for privileged containers that can be compromised. [1]
- In fact, our newest data sample shows that 49% of these containers live less than five minutes, and 21% of them live less than 10 seconds!. [1]
- Over the past year, we have seen 200% growth for both containerd and. [1]
- CRI O. Compare that to Docker, which came in at 79% growth last year but is down to 50% this year. [1]
- Docker registries are used by 36% of our customers. [1]
- Similar to the past few years, the Google Cloud Registry is once again the top public cloud repository, used by 26% of our Sysdig users. [1]
- However, Quay has picked up some growth from last year, increasing from 14% to 24%. [1]
- That represents a 300% growth compared to last yearās 252% increase. [1]
- Yearover year, Prometheus metric use increased to 62% across our customers, compared to 46% last year. [1]
- In 2018, some 60% of organizations that use containers suffered a container related security incident, according to a Tripwire survey. [8]
- 47% said they deployed containers known to have vulnerabilities, and 46% admitted they deployed containers without knowing whether or not they had vulnerabilities. [8]
- Overall, 94% of respondents said they have container security concerns, and 71% predicted that container security incidents would continue to increase. [8]
- This has happened in a big way in 2019, with containerd grabbing a significant 18% share. [9]
- For 2019, the maximum per node density we saw was 250 containers ā a 38% increase from 2018. [9]
- Itās no surprise that as the de facto container orchestration tool, Kubernetes takes a whopping 77% share of orchestrators in. [9]
- That number expands to 89% when you add in Red Hat OpenShift and Rancher ā both built with Kubernetes. [9]
- We found that 40% of images come from public sources. [9]
- However, of the nearly 3 million images hosted, less than 1% carry these designations. [9]
- Thatās an increase of 252% over the prior year. [9]
- Comparing container lifespans year over year, we found that the number of containers that are alive for 10 seconds or less has doubled to 22%. [9]
- In fact, yearover year, Prometheus metric use increased 130% across our customers who use custom metrics. [9]
- JMX metrics and StatsD are diminishing as the use of new programming frameworks that support Prometheus expand, down 45% and 17% respectively. [9]
- TechBeacon readers receive a 20% discount when they enter code KCCNEUTB. [10]
- 55% of respondents have had to delay an application rollout because of security concerns When security becomes an afterthought, agility is compromised. [11]
- The data tells a compelling story about the rise in container popularity, with 86% of technology leaders planning to prioritize containers for more applications. [0]
- 59% improved application quality and reduced defects. [3]
- 57% reduced application downtime and costs. [3]
- the potential of containers to reduce costs of production downtime, improve application quality (56%) and employee productivity (53%). [3]
- While wary of unproven efficiency (55%), they nevertheless see the potential advantages for the DevOps pipeline (77%). [3]
- In contrast, IT executives see the skepticism of top business executives as the biggest challenge (65%). [3]
- For them, the potential for high security (84%). [3]
- Lack of adequate expertise within their organization is the biggest concern (62%). [3]
- 68% of users feel that developers should own the security responsibility of their docker container images. [12]
- 54% of developers donāt do any docker image security testing. [12]
- Only 15.5% of the users claim to test their Docker images for vulnerabilities during development. [12]
- Since developers own container image security, they would benefit greatly from incorporating security earlier in their workflow, during developmentābut only 15.5% are doing so!. [12]
- We can also tell that every vulnerability present in all 10 surveyed images is likely to have more than one path associated with it. [12]
- By far the majority of the vulnerabilities observed in our study were rated as low severity, accounting for 74.9% of vulnerabilities. [12]
- Medium severity vulnerabilities accounted for 16.9%, followed by high severity vulnerabilities at 8.2%. [12]
- Roles again very broad, about a quarter developers, just under a fifth security and around 12 percent DevOps. [13]
- We still see this very big dominance for containerized applications, just under 60 percent overall throughout the survey. [13]
- So to see that 60 percent of production environments are using containers, I think that is not just showing that people are trying the technologies but really, truly adopting them across all of their environments. [13]
- given that there’s a proportion of production that people tend not to want to touch, and yet almost 60 percent is in containers. [13]
- I think the 36 percent is a big number. [13]
- 99 percent of people considered it very important or somewhat important to the cloud native strategy. [13]
- And again, when we look at historical surveys around the technology space over the last few years I think you would quite often see 30, 40 percent of people wouldn’t consider security particularly important in terms of technology strategy. [13]
- And here we can see 57 percent is the highest figure, which is misconfigurations. [13]
- And it’s interesting that misconfigurations is the low adopters, 5 percent higher than those who are high adopters, and I think to some extent that’s also if you’re only testing the water. [13]
- In fact, if we combine those together, not just cumulate but across all of our respondents and do it all across those too, it’s actually 56 percent of the respondents had either a misconfiguration or a known unpatched vulnerability. [13]
- When we look at those stats of how often people are able to do security testing when they have these high levels of automation 70 percent are able to test their security daily or more frequently. [13]
- 73 percent are have an average time to fix vulnerabilities in less than a week, and of those 36 percent also having an average time to fix of less than a day. [13]
- So you can see 37 percent of developers think they are responsible; conversely, 10 percent of security people think developers are responsible. [13]
I know you want to use Container Security Software, thus we made this list of best Container Security Software. We also wrote about how to learn Container Security Software and how to install Container Security Software. Recently we wrote how to uninstall Container Security Software for newbie users. Donāt forgot to check latest Container Security statistics of 2024.
Reference
- capitalone – https://www.capitalone.com/tech/cloud/container-adoption-statistics/.
- sysdig – https://sysdig.com/blog/sysdig-2021-container-security-usage-report/.
- threatstack – https://www.threatstack.com/blog/the-state-of-container-security-what-we-learned-from-our-survey.
- ibm – https://www.ibm.com/cloud/blog/stats-say-container-development.
- amazon – https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/containers/results-of-the-2020-aws-container-security-survey/.
- f5 – https://www.f5.com/company/blog/survey-says-container-security-still-cause-for-concern.
- statista – https://www.statista.com/statistics/1202646/container-technology-security-concerns/.
- dzone – https://dzone.com/articles/container-and-kubernetes-security-a-2020-update.
- tripwire – https://www.tripwire.com/state-of-security/devops/guide-container-security/.
- sysdig – https://sysdig.com/blog/sysdig-2019-container-usage-report/.
- techbeacon – https://techbeacon.com/enterprise-it/container-security-what-you-need-know-about-nist-standards.
- redhat – https://www.redhat.com/en/resources/kubernetes-adoption-security-market-trends-2021-overview.
- snyk – https://snyk.io/blog/top-ten-docker-images-contain-over-8000-vulnerable-paths/.
- containerjournal – https://containerjournal.com/editorial-calendar/cloud-native-security/are-we-there-yet-the-state-of-cloud-native-security/.
How Useful is Container Security
One of the main arguments for the usefulness of container security lies in its ability to provide a unified security framework across all levels of the application stack. With containers, security policies can be enforced consistently across environments, ensuring that vulnerabilities are addressed early in the development process and that security measures remain consistent throughout the application lifecycle. This is particularly valuable in modern, rapidly changing environments where traditional security measures may struggle to keep pace.
Another key benefit of container security is its ability to isolate individual applications and services, reducing the attack surface and minimizing the impact of potential security breaches. By encapsulating applications within their own containers, organizations can contain and isolate potential threats, preventing them from affecting other parts of the environment. This level of isolation not only helps to improve overall security but also simplifies the management of permissions and access controls, enhancing visibility and control over who can interact with each container.
Furthermore, container security can enable organizations to automate security best practices and procedures, driving greater efficiency and consistency in security processes. By integrating security measures into the containerization process, organizations can automatically scan containers for vulnerabilities, enforce security policies, and monitor container activity in real-time. This automated approach not only streamlines security operations but also enables organizations to respond quickly to emerging threats and vulnerabilities, reducing the risk of security incidents.
On the flip side, some may argue that container security poses challenges for organizations, particularly those with limited resources or expertise in cybersecurity. Securing containerized environments requires specialized knowledge and skills that may be beyond the capabilities of many organizations, leading to potential gaps in security defenses. This is especially true considering the dynamic and complex nature of containerized environments, which can make it more difficult to track and manage security controls effectively.
In addition, the sheer scale and complexity of containerized environments can present challenges for organizations seeking to secure their applications. With hundreds or even thousands of containers running simultaneously, organizations may struggle to maintain visibility into all aspects of their environment, leaving them vulnerable to undetected security threats. This can be further compounded by the rapid pace of container deployment and scalability, which can quickly outstrip organizations’ ability to manually secure each container.
In conclusion, while container security offers numerous benefits in terms of consistency, isolation, automation, and efficiency, it is not without its challenges. Organizations must carefully consider their security requirements, resources, and expertise before implementing container security measures to ensure that they can effectively protect their applications in an increasingly digital and interconnected world.
In Conclusion
Be it Container Security benefits statistics, Container Security usage statistics, Container Security productivity statistics, Container Security adoption statistics, Container Security roi statistics, Container Security market statistics, statistics on use of Container Security, Container Security analytics statistics, statistics of companies that use Container Security, statistics small businesses using Container Security, top Container Security systems usa statistics, Container Security software market statistics, statistics dissatisfied with Container Security, statistics of businesses using Container Security, Container Security key statistics, Container Security systems statistics, nonprofit Container Security statistics, Container Security failure statistics, top Container Security statistics, best Container Security statistics, Container Security statistics small business, Container Security statistics 2024, Container Security statistics 2021, Container Security statistics 2024 you will find all from this page. š
We tried our best to provide all the Container Security statistics on this page. Please comment below and share your opinion if we missed any Container Security statistics.