E-Prescribing Statistics 2024 – Everything You Need to Know

by

Are you looking to add E-Prescribing to your arsenal of tools? Maybe for your business or personal use only, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to know more about the most important E-Prescribing statistics of 2024.

My team and I scanned the entire web and collected all the most useful E-Prescribing stats on this page. You don’t need to check any other resource on the web for any E-Prescribing statistics. All are here only 🙂

How much of an impact will E-Prescribing have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your business? Should you invest in E-Prescribing? We will answer all your E-Prescribing related questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any word. 🙂

Best E-Prescribing Statistics

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 105 E-Prescribing Statistics on this page 🙂

E-Prescribing Market Statistics

  • The global ePrescribing market size is projected to reach USD 3.3 billion by 2025 from USD 1.2 billion in 2020, at a CAGR of 23.3%. [0]
  • 10 Electronic prescribers’ pharmacy costs decreased 3 3.5% due to increased use of preferred formulary brands and generics, in highly managed market. [1]

E-Prescribing Software Statistics

  • Reasons to stop using e prescribing software included hardware problems , workflow issues , software problems , and other problems , such as time consumption and connection issues. [2]

E-Prescribing Latest Statistics

  • All prescriptions 66% 73% 79% 84% Noncontrolled substances 76% 83% 86% Controlled substances 17% 26% 38% Register for free Log in. [3]
  • estimated internally that the drug company reported by Reuters STAT to be Purdue Pharma could gain nearly 3,000 new customers and increase opioid sales to the tune of $11.3 million by implementing the change. [4]
  • Between 2016 and 2017 , more than 700,000 unique “pain care plans” were started because of the alert, and 20% to 33% of them involved opioids. [4]
  • This intervention reduced inappropriate antibiotic prescribing by nearly 20%. [4]
  • In 2011, the United States spent $263 billion on prescription drugs, which was a 2.9 percent increase from 2010. [2]
  • In the United States, an estimated 200,000 deaths occur yearly from preventable medical mistakes and hospital infections. [2]
  • Found a 17.5 percent decrease in prescriptions for high cost drugs among the intervention group compared to the control group, which resulted in a savings of $109,897 on new prescriptions in 12 months. [2]
  • An annual estimated savings of $402,619 was found on the basis of these numbers. [2]
  • Increase of 10 percent in prescriptions picked up when e prescribed compared to written prescriptions. [2]
  • An analysis of a study done by Surescripts between 2008 and 2010 estimated $140 to $240 billion in savings and improved health outcomes, mainly through improved medication adherence, over 10 years. [2]
  • From these numbers an annual estimated savings of $402,619 was found.45. [2]
  • The Surescripts study from 2008 to 2010 found a 10 percent increase in prescriptions picked up when e prescribed compared to written prescriptions. [2]
  • A study by McMullin, Lonergan, and Rynearson involving 19 clinicians found a 17.5 percent decrease in prescriptions for high cost drugs among the intervention group compared to the control group. [2]
  • Table49Table11.)Meaningful Use and E prescribingThe HITECH Act of 2009 proposed that eligible healthcare providers throughout the United States have access to EHRs and use them according to the standards for meaningful use set by CMS. [2]
  • CMS has made e prescribing one of the core requirements of meaningful use, requiring eligible providers to transmit at least 40 percent of eligible prescriptions electronically during. [2]
  • A major barrier, reported by more than 80 percent of primary care physicians, has been lack of financial support. [2]
  • Potential costs of implementing these systems were estimated by the DEA in 2010 to be between $43 million and $1.54 billion for different options that include features such as identity proofing, authentication protocols, and various security. [2]
  • The potential for cost savings has been estimated to be $27 billion per year in the United States. [2]
  • From these numbers an annual estimated savings of $402,619 was found. [2]
  • The HITECH Act of 2009 proposed that eligible healthcare providers throughout the United States have access to EHRs and use them according to the standards for meaningful use set by CMS. [2]
  • CMS has made e prescribing one of the core requirements of meaningful use, requiring eligible providers to transmit at least 40 percent of eligible prescriptions electronically during Stage 1. [2]
  • Perceptions of eprescribing included 64% reporting e prescribing as very efficient. [5]
  • The next closest method was computer generated fax and prescriptions in which ∼25% rated the method as very efficient. [5]
  • RESULTS Overall, 78 (48%). [6]
  • As recently as 2017, 26% of physicians said they did not receive hospital discharge summaries in time for most follow. [7]
  • Nearly all patients (94%). [7]
  • 324 million patients in our master patient index, representing 98% of the U.S. population* 0.04 seconds to return a patient match on average via Surescripts’ proprietary matching algorithm. [7]
  • 1.91 billion e prescriptions filled (+7% in 2020). [7]
  • 238.7 million Real Time Prescription Benefit responses delivered to prescribers (+75% in 2020) 426 million links to clinical document sources shared (+28% in 2020). [7]
  • 90% of respondents refer to the patient’s formulary information within the EHR. [7]
  • 64% of respondents find access to group/planlevel prescription benefit information very or extremely valuable in the eprescribing workflow.14 E. [7]
  • Surescripts estimates that 84% of prescriptions written are filled. [7]
  • Data from a sampling of telehealth vendors revealed that the weekly volume of e prescriptions written via a telehealth platform peaked the week of March 29, 2020 a 72.5% increase from the week of February 23. [7]
  • The number of prescribers utilizing E Prescribing increased more than 6% in 2020. [7]
  • Over the course of the year, the number of enabled prescribers grew 30%. [7]
  • All specialties increased their EPCS utilization by at least 10 percentage points in 2020. [7]
  • Pain management saw the largest increase with a jump of 17 percentage points. [7]
  • Delaware moved up from 27th to 19th, becoming the first state with 100% of pharmacies enabled. [7]
  • Oklahoma moved up 12 spots to sixth place, sending nearly 84.8% of controlled substance prescriptions via EPCS. [7]
  • Washington also jumped up 10 spots with 55% of controlled substance prescriptions sent via EPCS. [7]
  • Prescriber enablement in Hawaii surged from 7.6% to 36.2% despite the lack of a state mandate. [7]
  • 82% of U.S. patients covered by contracted health plans and PBMs 95% of U.S. prescribers served by EHRs enabled for the service. [7]
  • The impact was significant Medication pickup rates increased to nearly 90%, up from 60–70%. [7]
  • 167% increase in specialty hubs contracted 69% increase in medications covered DISEASE STATES COVERED BY SPECIALTY PATIENT ENROLLMENT. [7]
  • Analyzing one month of Medication History data in 2020 found a significant impact 62% of Medication History responses deduplicated 29% of medications deduplicated. [7]
  • Reduced false positives for medication non adherence by 26% by eliminating 585 unnecessary patient interventions out of 2,235 opportunities identified from payer claims data. [7]
  • Error rates for eprescribing adopters decreased 1.5foldfrom 26.0 errors per 100 prescriptions at baseline (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.438.9) to 16.0 errors per 100 prescriptions at one year (95% CI, 12.7 20.2; p = .09). [8]
  • Error rates remained unchanged for nonadopters (37.3 per 100 prescriptions at baseline, 95% CI, 27.650.2, versus 38.4 per 100 prescriptions at one year, 95% CI 27.4 53.9; p = .54). [8]
  • During 2013–2016, 6.5% of adults aged 20 and over reported using a prescription opioid analgesic in the past 30 days. [9]
  • The percentage of adults who used a prescription opioid analgesic increased with age, from 3.2% among younger adults aged 20–39, to 7.5% among middle aged adults 40–59, and to 9.6% among adults aged 60 and over. [9]
  • A higher percentage of women (7.6%) compared with men (5.3%). [9]
  • Ageadjusted opioid analgesic use was highest among nonHispanic white (6.6%) and nonHispanic black (6.7%) adults compared with non Hispanic Asian (2.0%) and Hispanic (5.3%). [9]
  • The percentage of nonHispanic white (7.7%) and nonHispanic black (8.4%) women using an opioid analgesic was higher compared with non Hispanic Asian (2.4%) and Hispanic (5.8%). [9]
  • However, among men, there were no significant differences among nonHispanic white (5.4%), non Hispanic black (4.6%), and Hispanic (4.7%). [9]
  • Crude percentage of adults aged 20 and over who used a prescription opioid analgesic in the past 30 days, by sex and age. [9]
  • Baseline data showed that only 36% of patients received a stat dose of antibiotic on admission. [10]
  • We reduced the delay in antibiotic administration in patients with sepsis from 49 to 34 min, an improvement of 31%. [10]
  • The percentage of patients receiving a stat dose of antibiotics increased from 36% to 63%. [10]
  • Following our initial data collection, we aimed to improve the time from antibiotic prescription to administration by increasing the percentage of patients receiving a stat dose of antibiotic to 75% over the course of a year. [10]
  • sepsis.2 The mortality rate is between 28% and 50%, and approximately three quarters of patients will survive sepsis if recognised and treated promptly.3. [10]
  • We identified 35 patients who received antibiotics and had at least two moderate risk factors (15%). [10]
  • We found that only 36% patients had a stat dose of antibiotic prescribed. [10]
  • Our data showed that very few patients received a stat dose of antibiotic on admission (36%). [10]
  • Our aim was to improve the time from antibiotic prescription to administration by increasing the number of patients receiving a stat dose of antibiotic to 75% over the course of a year. [10]
  • We collected the data following this intervention and found that the number of patients with suspected sepsis receiving a stat dose of antibiotic had increased to 50%. [10]
  • Reassuringly, the results showed an increase in the number of stat antibiotics administered (62.5%). [10]
  • In April, after we had implemented our initial intervention of changing the e prescribing system to make stat doses of antibiotics easier to prescribe, 50% patients with sepsis had a stat dose prescribed. [10]
  • The overall median time from prescription to administration of antibiotics was 41 min, an improvement of 16% from baseline. [10]
  • In June, after our second intervention of education with a focus on communication between medical and nursing teams, 63% patients with sepsis had a stat dose of antibiotics prescribed. [10]
  • This is an improvement of 31% from our baseline results and an improvement of 17% from our first PDSA cycle. [10]
  • The above changes helped to reduce the overall median time from GP referral to antibiotic administration to 297 min from a baseline of 326 min; a reduction of 8.9%. [10]
  • 80% of fortune 2000 companies rely on our research to identify new revenue sources. [0]
  • Percent Change in Opioid Prescribing, Percent MME of Prescribed Opioids and Prescriber EPCS, 2013 2018 Utilization Relative to the State’s Baseline Rates in 2013 eTable 1. [11]
  • In 2018, the population weighted percent of opioids prescribed using EPCS. [11]
  • was 27%, up from 0% as of 2013. [11]
  • Over the same period, there was a decrease from 64 071 MME per 100 persons in 2013 to 40 906 MME per 100 persons in 2018, representing 36% of the 2013 level. [11]
  • By 2018, EPCS increased to 69.4% in states with mandates for its use and 23.6% in states without mandates. [11]
  • In multivariable models, a 10 percentagepoint increase in the use of EPCS was associated with an additional 2 prescriptions per 100 persons (95% CI, 1.32.8) and a 0.8% (95% CI, 0.06% 1.5%). [11]
  • Prescription opioids are an important component of the opioid epidemic, contributing to 55% of the approximately 400 000 opioid related overdose deaths that occurred between 1999 and 2017. [11]
  • We examined population weighted trends in EPCS use, opioid prescriptions, and percent change in MME of opioids across the United States since 2010, when EPCS was first legalized through amendment of the Controlled Substance Act. [11]
  • We also plotted changes in opioid prescriptions, percent change in MME of opioids, and EPCS use by state from 2013 to 2018. [11]
  • Next, we estimated 2way fixed effects models to measure the adjusted association between increasing rates of EPCS use, percent change in MME of opioids relative to the national average in 2013, and opioid prescriptions per 100 persons. [11]
  • In our primary model, states with high levels of opioid prescribing in 2013 that then, for example, reduced opioid prescribing by 10% of their 2013 level would receive more credit than states with low initial levels that similarly decreased by 10%. [11]
  • In contrast, this approach would give equal credit to both states that reduced rates in their state by 10%. [11]
  • In 2018, the population weighted percent of opioids prescribed using EPCS was 27%, up from 0% as of 2013. [11]
  • The mean decrease in MME across states was 25 299 (37.1% of the national average) and ranged from decreases of 62 407 MME per 100 persons in Tennessee (91.5% of the national average). [11]
  • MME per 100 persons decreased by 37% (95% CI, 34% 39%). [11]
  • The same increase in EPCS use was associated with a small increase in MME of 0.8% (95% CI, 0.06%1.5%) from the mean level in 2013, which is equivalent to 565.9 MME . [11]
  • About 91% of community pharmacies and 34% ofofficebased providers have electronic prescription. [12]
  • An estimated 1.5 million adverse drug events occurannually in the U.S., accounting for approximately $3.5 million inhealth care spending. [12]
  • Pharmacists andproviders were able to retrieve records of evacuees’ medicationsthrough SureScripts, an e prescribing network covering more than 90% ofU.S. pharmacies. [12]
  • After a mean of 4.6 months, patients who received aneprescription had a higher rate of LDL goal achievement and were morelikely to receive a generic cholesterol lowering medication comparedwith controls . [12]
  • the increased frequency ofelectronic submission are likely to result in fewer prescriptionforgeries.11. [12]
  • Clarification of Inaccuracies31Another study reported an overall intervention rate of 3.8% fore prescriptions in the community chain setting, with omitted informationthe most likely reason for the pharmacist to intervene. [12]
  • Medication errors and adverse drug events contribute to approximately 7,000 deaths a year, with an estimated cost for drug related morbidity and mortality exceeding $77 billion a year.1. [1]
  • A minimum of 1.5 million preventable medication errors occur each year in hospitals, nursing homes and ambulatory care settings, according to the Institute of Medicine. [1]
  • More than 100,000 medication allergy alerts were presented, of which more than 41,000 were acted upon.4. [1]
  • The SEMI initiative found that when a formulary alert was presented, 39 percent of the time the physician changed the prescription to comply with formulary requirements.9. [1]
  • 3 eRx Collaborative Press release, eRx Collaborative Boosts Patient Safety with 8,000 Prescriptions Changed in June, September 5, 2006, available at http//www.erxcollaborative.org/Press%20Release%20September%202006.pdf. [1]
  • and generics increased 4.8% vs. control. [1]
  • This can also reduce medication errors by up to 30% when compared with the old paper systems. [13]
  • ePMA) system is expected to have risen from 19% in 2018 to more than 80% by March 2021. [13]

I know you want to use E-Prescribing Software, thus we made this list of best E-Prescribing Software. We also wrote about how to learn E-Prescribing Software and how to install E-Prescribing Software. Recently we wrote how to uninstall E-Prescribing Software for newbie users. Don’t forgot to check latest E-Prescribing statistics of 2024.

Reference

  1. marketsandmarkets – https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/e-prescription-systems-market-910.html.
  2. amcp – https://www.amcp.org/about/managed-care-pharmacy-101/concepts-managed-care-pharmacy/electronic-prescribing.
  3. nih – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995494/.
  4. statista – https://www.statista.com/statistics/864380/share-of-us-e-prescriptions/.
  5. statnews – https://www.statnews.com/2020/02/18/without-oversight-electronic-prescribing-can-harm-patients/.
  6. nih – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21112243/.
  7. nih – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34588106/.
  8. surescripts – https://surescripts.com/news-center/national-progress-report-2020.
  9. nih – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22013821/.
  10. cdc – https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/prescription-opioid/prescription-opioid.htm.
  11. bmj – https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/7/4/e000292.
  12. jamanetwork – https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2774352.
  13. uspharmacist – https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/pros-and-cons-of-e-prescribing-in-community-pharmacies-42392.
  14. www – https://www.gov.uk/government/news/16-million-to-introduce-digital-prescribing-in-hospitals.

How Useful is E Prescribing

One of the most significant advantages of e-prescribing is its role in enhancing patient safety. Handwritten prescriptions can sometimes be illegible, leading to medication errors. By using electronic systems, healthcare providers can ensure that prescriptions are accurately transmitted to pharmacies, reducing the risk of misinterpretation. Additionally, electronic systems can flag potential drug interactions, allergies, or duplicate medications, alerting healthcare providers to potential issues before the prescription is filled.

In addition to promoting patient safety, e-prescribing also improves efficiency within healthcare settings. Healthcare providers can easily access a patient’s complete medication history, allowing them to make more informed decisions when prescribing new medications. This streamlined process eliminates the need for patients to carry physical copies of their medical records and significantly reduces the time spent verifying prescriptions with patients or pharmacies.

Moreover, e-prescribing helps to streamline the prescription process and reduce errors. With electronic systems, healthcare providers can quickly send prescriptions to pharmacies, eliminating the need for patients to drop off or pick up paper scripts. This not only saves time for both healthcare providers and patients but also reduces the risk of lost or misplaced prescriptions. Additionally, electronic systems can help to standardize dosage instructions and medication names, further reducing the potential for errors.

Another benefit of e-prescribing is its impact on healthcare costs. By reducing medication errors and streamlining the prescription process, e-prescribing can help to lower healthcare expenses associated with adverse drug events, hospital admissions, and unnecessary tests or treatments. Additionally, electronic systems can provide physicians with information on generic alternatives or cost-saving options, enabling them to make more cost-effective treatment decisions.

Overall, the benefits of e-prescribing are clear. From enhancing patient safety and improving efficiency to reducing errors and lowering healthcare costs, electronic prescribing has revolutionized the way prescriptions are managed in healthcare settings. As technology continues to advance, e-prescribing will likely become even more widespread, further optimizing the healthcare experience for both patients and providers.

In conclusion, e-prescribing has become a valuable tool in modern healthcare, offering numerous benefits to patients, providers, and the healthcare system as a whole. As technology continues to shape the future of healthcare, the use of electronic prescribing will likely play a key role in improving patient outcomes and enhancing the overall quality of care.

In Conclusion

Be it E-Prescribing benefits statistics, E-Prescribing usage statistics, E-Prescribing productivity statistics, E-Prescribing adoption statistics, E-Prescribing roi statistics, E-Prescribing market statistics, statistics on use of E-Prescribing, E-Prescribing analytics statistics, statistics of companies that use E-Prescribing, statistics small businesses using E-Prescribing, top E-Prescribing systems usa statistics, E-Prescribing software market statistics, statistics dissatisfied with E-Prescribing, statistics of businesses using E-Prescribing, E-Prescribing key statistics, E-Prescribing systems statistics, nonprofit E-Prescribing statistics, E-Prescribing failure statistics, top E-Prescribing statistics, best E-Prescribing statistics, E-Prescribing statistics small business, E-Prescribing statistics 2024, E-Prescribing statistics 2021, E-Prescribing statistics 2024 you will find all from this page. 🙂

We tried our best to provide all the E-Prescribing statistics on this page. Please comment below and share your opinion if we missed any E-Prescribing statistics.




Leave a Comment