Grant Management Statistics 2024 – Everything You Need to Know

by

Are you looking to add Grant Management to your arsenal of tools? Maybe for your business or personal use only, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to know more about the most important Grant Management statistics of 2024.

My team and I scanned the entire web and collected all the most useful Grant Management stats on this page. You don’t need to check any other resource on the web for any Grant Management statistics. All are here only 🙂

How much of an impact will Grant Management have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your business? Should you invest in Grant Management? We will answer all your Grant Management related questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any word. 🙂

Best Grant Management Statistics

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 108 Grant Management Statistics on this page 🙂

Grant Management Software Statistics

Grant Management Latest Statistics

  • In 2019, the federal government distributed $721 billion to states and local governments, about 16% of the United States budget. [0]
  • About 61% of those grants were for health care, 16% income security programs, 9% transportation, 9% education, 9% training, 9% employment, and 9% social services. [0]
  • This makes up 29% of all awarded federal grants. [0]
  • In 2019, the National Institute of Health received 54,903 research project grants and funded 11,035, for an acceptance rate of 20% ( Data Book). [0]
  • Between 2008 and 2019, Federal grants to states rose by 42% even after adjusting for inflation. [0]
  • In the same year, 92 percent of foundations were independent organizations, while 3% were corporate and 1% were community organizations. [0]
  • In 2019, foundation giving increased to $75.7 billion, a 2.5% increase from 2018. [0]
  • That accounted for 17% of total giving in the United States. [0]
  • Charitable giving increased in many sectors in 2019, including education (12.1%), public society benefit (13.1%), arts, culture, and humanities (12.6%), and environment and animal organizations (11.3%). [0]
  • About 20% of nonprofit income is derived from grants as of 2020. [0]
  • As of 2020, only about 32% of foundations provide general operating support to their grantees. [0]
  • Only 18% provide capacity building or organizational effectiveness grants to the majority of its grantees, while 29% of foundations say they provide any assistance beyond the grant itself. [0]
  • A full 27 percent of donors say that technology has affected how they give to nonprofit organizations. [0]
  • Individual donations accounted for 87% of all giving in 2016. [0]
  • A rising number donors, 41%, say that grantmaker transparency is an important factor in where they decide to give. [0]
  • In 2019 2020, 4,860 United States residents applied for a Fulbright Student Grant and 793 were accepted, for an acceptance rate of 18 percent. [0]
  • The average award was $3,800 per student and 80% of students came from families with an annual income below $40,000 a year. [0]
  • A grant writer applying for a combination of new and existing funders should have a success rate between 50 and 60%. [0]
  • A grant writer applying for new grants should have a success rate of 30 to 40%. [0]
  • A grant writer applying for existing grants should have a success rate of about 80%. [0]
  • In 2019, 75% of grant seekers who submitted an application won an award, while 94% percent of grant seekers who submitted three to five grant applications received at least one award. [0]
  • Of grant seekers who submitted six to ten grant applications, 98% received at least one award. [0]
  • In 2019, 82% of grant seekers reported acquiring funding from private foundations and 39% reported that private foundations were their largest source of funding. [0]
  • Another 37% reported that a private foundation was the source of their largest award. [0]
  • Grant research, submission, and reporting took more than three days per grant for 40% grant seekers. [0]
  • Making a plan for the grant application and writing the grant took more than five days for 40% of the same group. [0]
  • In a study done byGrant Station, they report that 61% of all grant seekers relied on only one or two people in the grant writing and submission process. [1]
  • Grant seekers and writers are primarily internal employees of the applicant organization (74%). [1]
  • The assets account for just under 7% of all assets in the grantmaking sector. [1]
  • There are over 86,000 grantmaking entities, with 92% represented by independent foundations. [1]
  • Individual giving consistently amounts to 70% of the total, making it the highest charitable giving category year after year. [1]
  • Foundations represented 17% of the total charitable giving in 2019. [1]
  • Of those organizations that reported private foundations were their largest source of funding, 95% were nonprofits. [1]
  • The Health sector represents over 60% of all federal grants to state and local governments. [1]
  • The Department of Health & Human Services was the most significant federal grantmaking agency through awarding 29% of total grant funding. [1]
  • Federal grants represent 40% of government funding sources, behind state government (47%). [1]
  • In 2020, the success rate was 21%. [1]
  • Corporations represent only 3% of grant funding. [1]
  • Corporations represent 17% of non governmental grant funding. [1]
  • The amount of funding from corporations increased in 2019 by 13.4%, resulting in $21.09 billion in funding. [1]
  • More than 65% of corporate foundations offer matching grant opportunities. [1]
  • The top 50 corporations represent only 2% of the total number of corporate giving foundations yet produce over 50% of total funding awards. [1]
  • Corporations are watching and changing their giving strategies due to data showing that over 60% of millennials and generation Z want to work for companies with high corporate social responsibility awareness. [1]
  • The National Cancer Institute intends to commit an estimated total of $35 million for up to 5 awards in FY 2014. [2]
  • Applicants are required to prepare applications according to the current PHS 398 application forms in accordance with the PHS 398 Application Guide. [2]
  • Issuing NIAID and partner components intend to commit an estimated total of up to $35.5M, depending on funds availability, in Core funding in FY21 for 4 Statistical and Data Management Centers. [3]
  • £18,493,754 483,300 89.0% 97.1% 4.4% East of England £21,901,986 £21,827,522. [4]
  • 643,152 90.8% 90.7% 4.3% London £36,893,033 £36,776,328 1,082,610 92.9% 93.1% 3.0%. [4]
  • North East £13,059,304 £12,498,784 328,095 95.8% 95.7% 3.4%. [4]
  • North West £35,799,139 £35,318,609 1,002,202 93.5% 94.0% 3.5% South East £29,585,516 £28,785,740. [4]
  • 875,261 90.3% 92.5% 4.6% South West £20,478,735 £19,933,709 501,066 92.0% 93.1% 5.4%. [4]
  • West Midlands £26,969,935 £26,355,844 586,869 94.5% 93.1% 3.4% Yorkshire and the Humber £25,488,849 £25,323,804. [4]
  • 790,725 91.1% 95.3% 3.0% Totals £229,100,000 £225,314,096 6,293,279 92.2% 93.7% 3.7% Notes. [4]
  • As described above, authorities had an obligation to spend at least 80% of their awards on these two categories. [4]
  • Percentage spend on admin This is calculated for the period 1 December 2020. [4]
  • The annex below shows by authority, the authority grant allocation for the period 1 December 2020 to 16 April 2021, the authority’s reported spend for the same period and the percentage of the authority spend on administering the scheme. [4]
  • % Spend on administration Bath and North East Somerset UA £521,136 £521,136 7,408 98.5% 89.8% 6.2%. [4]
  • £622,912 22,354 84.4% 95.6% 1.0% Blackburn with Darwen UA £870,533 £859,000 43,169 89.8% 92.9% 9.8% Blackpool UA £949,701 £949,701 35,517 97.1% 97.1% 2.0%. [4]
  • Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole UA £1,439,729 £1,439,729 75,825 89.1% 89.7% 10.8% Bracknell Forest UA £298,119. [4]
  • £298,119 7,904 96.9% 99.9% 3.7% Brighton and Hove UA £1,166,276 £1,166,276 31,055 95.7% 98.7% 0.0%. [4]
  • Bristol UA £2,210,763 £2,204,015 30,641 91.1% 96.1% 5.1% Buckinghamshire UA £1,303,854 £1,303,476 43,375 85.9% 93.3% 5.8% Cambridgeshire £1,966,878 £1,966,877 60,637 97.1% 93.8% 13.9% Central Bedfordshire UA £791,142 £791,142 32,477 97.5% 99.6% 0.0%. [4]
  • 43,420 100.0% 97.5% 10.0% Cheshire West and Chester UA £1,247,176 £1,244,205 14,522 92.7% 89.7% 8.7% City of Nottingham UA £1,905,943 £1,845,071 36,923 84.5% 100.0% 3.1% Cornwall UA £2,468,306 £2,468,306 22,081 85.7% 78.9% 6.9% Cumbria. [4]
  • 4.3% Darlington UA £491,645 £491,645 10,618 94.5% 100.0% 0.1% Derby City UA £1,212,195 £1,212,195 44,070 85.3% 100.0% 2.0% Derbyshire. [4]
  • £2,939,251 £2,840,961 84,189 86.2% 96.6% 4.0% Devon £2,752,911 £2,388,133 59,404 97.1% 95.2% 7.1% Dorset UA. [4]
  • £1,242,738 £1,234,288 35,214 92.1% 93.6% 5.8% Durham UA £2,523,486 £2,523,486 79,533 98.0% 95.0% 2.3%. [4]
  • East Riding of Yorkshire UA £1,111,939 £1,091,143 11,410 98.6% 93.2% 3.8%. [4]
  • 3,638 100.0% 100.0% 3.1% Hertfordshire £3,360,399 £3,360,399 109,137 84.3% 95.8% 4.9% Isle of Wight UA £615,666 £615,666 24,902 93.7% 93.5% 3.5% Isles of Scilly. [4]
  • £5,590 £4,880 35 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% Kent £6,069,935 £6,069,935 178,239 86.2% 93.7% 4.6% Kingston upon Hull UA £1,656,416 £1,656,415. [4]
  • £5,283,867 £5,283,867 154,804 98.6% 98.8% 3.3%. [4]
  • Leicester City UA £1,889,044 £1,889,044 58,877 94.1% 86.8% 2.2%. [4]
  • Leicestershire £1,970,479 £1,970,478 48,726 91.5% 93.6% 12.0% Lincolnshire £2,996,426 £2,878,718 84,469 86.9% 97.5% 4.0%. [4]
  • Luton UA £987,438 £987,438 22,017 96.0% 98.3% 2.2%. [4]
  • 6,599 97.3% 96.5% 7.5% Milton Keynes UA £973,259 £812,791 6,925 88.9% 91.6% 6.1% Norfolk £3,693,351 £3,693,351 72,832 90.0% 95.6% 1.6% North East Lincolnshire UA £846,946. [4]
  • £846,463 8,950 93.7% 96.1% 0.0% North Lincolnshire UA £717,712 £717,712 22,529 95.0% 93.8% 2.7%. [4]
  • North Somerset UA £712,111 £704,291 17,784 90.0% 96.0% 5.0% North Yorkshire £1,934,414 £1,934,413 50,957 99.4% 98.8% 7.2% Northamptonshire £2,804,070 £2,754,367 24,665 93.0% 100.0% 2.1%. [4]
  • 34,052 92.0% 97.5% 5.8% Nottinghamshire £3,121,162 £3,046,260 100,389 89.5% 100.0% 4.4% Oxfordshire. [4]
  • £1,843,455 £1,843,455 57,423 91.0% 96.3% 2.1% Peterborough UA £1,002,193 £1,002,193 53,453 99.3% 99.9% 12.5% Plymouth UA £1,247,976 £1,247,976 33,613 87.3% 86.6% 5.3%. [4]
  • £1,031,806 19,504 93.2% 85.5% 5.5% Reading UA £625,979 £581,587 38,728 95.4% 88.4% 5.3% Redcar and Cleveland UA £704,521 £704,521 3,912 93.3% 80.2% 5.5% Rutland UA £84,931 £56,660 992 93.8% 99.9% 8.7%. [4]
  • Shropshire UA £1,134,226 £1,040,620 8,307 81.4% 80.0% 4.7% Slough UA £640,301 £640,301 18,086 89.8% 82.6% 2.4% Somerset £2,082,367 £2,082,300 59,200 98.3% 100.0% 0.0% South Gloucestershire UA £767,028 £766,867 17,406 82.0% 89.0% 0.1%. [4]
  • Southampton UA £1,214,050 £1,093,920 44,477 94.4% 96.6% 10.7%. [4]
  • Southendon Sea UA £773,132 £773,130 16,357 88.4% 100.0% 7.0% Staffordshire £2,993,694 £2,993,694 81,632 95.6% 99.2% 6.1%. [4]
  • Stocktonon Tees UA £915,715 £915,714 16,346 100.0% 99.8% 3.2%. [4]
  • 53,126 90.6% 90.4% 3.2% Suffolk £2,800,313 £2,800,313. [4]
  • 95,092 82.8% 82.8% 1.5% Surrey £2,865,625. [4]
  • £2,835,665 77,302 88.7% 92.2% 0.5% Swindon UA £828,716 £678,679 36,660 85.9% 100.0% 3.4% Telford and the Wrekin UA £821,201 £821,201 28,307 100.0% 97.6% 0.0%. [4]
  • 19,973 93.0% 85.6% 6.4% Thurrock UA £704,825. [4]
  • £657,430 20,994 96.4% 91.8% 1.7% Torbay UA £674,449 £668,195 12,748 96.9% 100.0% 0.0% Warrington UA £783,849 £781,552 14,176 99.0% 80.0% 0.0% Warwickshire £1,892,919 £1,892,919 51,327 96.7% 95.0% 0.9%. [4]
  • West Berkshire UA £375,843 £375,843 11,494 82.3% 80.9% 0.4% West Sussex £2,681,268 £2,681,012 59,033 84.3% 93.0% 7.1% Wiltshire UA £1,493,103 £1,493,103 27,562 90.7% 96.9% 5.5% Windsor and Maidenhead UA £318,524 £318,481. [4]
  • Wokingham UA £281,258 £281,258 4,269 87.6% 97.7% 1.0% Worcestershire £2,166,020 £2,166,020 47,017 92.8% 90.8% 6.2%. [4]
  • £560,247 1,996 89.3% 98.5% 5.4% Bolton £1,497,077. [4]
  • Bury £834,758 £834,758 20,550 85.8% 94.9% 3.1%. [4]
  • Manchester £3,478,840 £3,478,840 118,192 98.8% 94.8% 1.4% Oldham. [4]
  • £1,313,537 £1,313,537 32,338 98.8% 96.4% 1.7% Rochdale £1,262,632 £1,262,632 23,746 87.7% 98.2% 3.5% Salford £1,468,064 £1,277,462 41,414 98.5% 93.9% 4.1% Stockport £1,169,432. [4]
  • £1,169,432 29,146 96.3% 97.6% 5.3% Tameside £1,205,625 £1,205,570 31,151 95.3% 100.0% 0.0% Trafford £792,746 £792,746 22,624 93.2% 96.0% 5.1% Wigan £1,515,480 £1,503,559 21,695 92.1% 92.0% 5.9% Knowsley £998,245 £998,245. [4]
  • 34,621 88.3% 86.2% 5.2% Liverpool £3,286,613 £3,159,394 85,192 86.4% 91.3% 0.9% St Helens £965,350 £965,350 24,338 100.0% 99.1% 0.6% Sefton. [4]
  • £1,431,097 £1,431,097 47,061 91.6% 86.4% 2.8% Bradford £3,073,137 £3,073,137 62,675 84.5% 96.5% 1.0% Calderdale £989,188 £846,782 16,927 97.3% 97.4% 1.8% Kirklees £2,004,990 £2,004,990 66,609 87.3% 93.5% 4.0% Leeds £3,824,025 £3,824,025. [4]
  • 177,973 86.8% 99.4% 4.5% Wakefield £1,696,917 £1,696,917 39,688 98.1% 83.8% 2.9% City of London £27,177 £18,159 107 90.9% 100.0% 0.0% Camden. [4]
  • £1,055,536 £1,055,536 29,197 96.9% 97.9% 4.8% Greenwich £. [4]
  • 23,884 92.3% 95.3% 1.8% Hackney £1,552,493 £1,552,492 21,716 99.5% 99.1% 4.5% Hammersmith and Fulham £788,543 £788,543. [4]
  • 59,412 100.0% 100.0% 4.7% Tower Hamlets. [4]
  • £1,621,260 £1,621,260 14,319 89.4% 94.2% 5.0% Wandsworth £1,126,912 £1,126,912 12,397 87.2% 79.6% 2.9% Westminster £1,032,813 £1,032,813 12,301 94.4% 100.0% 0.8% Barking and Dagenham £1,172,556 £1,172,556. [4]
  • £1,329,224 £1,329,224 38,998 86.9% 94.5% 4.9% Harrow £793,705 £793,704 30,904 100.0% 100.0% 2.1% Havering £895,803 £895,803. [4]
  • 12,182 84.2% 88.6% 10.9% Hillingdon £1,120,320 £1,120,320. [4]
  • £1,274,264 £1,261,524 15,967 91.0% 81.4% 0.0% England £229,100,000 £225,314,096 6,293,279 92.2% 93.7% 3.66% Notes. [4]
  • Percentage spend on admin This is calculated for the period 1 December 2020 to 16 April 2021 as reported admin costs / total reported spend on the COVID Winter Grant for the authority. [4]

I know you want to use Grant Management Software, thus we made this list of best Grant Management Software. We also wrote about how to learn Grant Management Software and how to install Grant Management Software. Recently we wrote how to uninstall Grant Management Software for newbie users. Don’t forgot to check latest Grant Management statistics of 2024.

Reference

  1. submittable – https://blog.submittable.com/grant-statistics/.
  2. instrumentl – https://www.instrumentl.com/blog/grant-statistics-and-trends.
  3. nih – https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/rfa-ca-12-011.html.
  4. nih – https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/rfa-ai-19-002.html.
  5. www – https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/covid-winter-grant-management-information-1-december-2020-to-16-april-2021/covid-winter-grant-management-information-1-december-2020-to-16-april-2021.

How Useful is Grant Management

One of the key benefits of effective grant management is accountability. By carefully tracking how grant funds are being used, organizations can demonstrate to grantors and stakeholders that the funds are being utilized for their intended purposes. This transparency not only helps build trust with funders but also ensures that the organization is fulfilling its obligations as a grant recipient.

Additionally, grant management allows organizations to maximize the impact of the funds they receive. By creating a clear plan for how funds will be used, organizations can ensure that resources are allocated strategically to achieve the desired outcomes. This level of planning and oversight can help organizations avoid wasteful spending and ensure that funds are directed towards activities that will generate the greatest impact.

Proper grant management also plays a crucial role in compliance with grant requirements. Grantors often have specific guidelines and reporting requirements that must be followed in order to receive and maintain funding. Through diligent grant management, organizations can ensure that they are meeting these obligations and avoiding any potential pitfalls that could jeopardize future funding opportunities.

Moreover, grant management can contribute to the overall efficiency of an organization’s operations. By establishing clear processes for managing grant funds, organizations can streamline their financial management practices and reduce the risk of errors or oversights. This can help organizations operate more smoothly and effectively, allowing them to focus on achieving their mission and goals.

In today’s increasingly competitive funding landscape, effective grant management is more important than ever. Organizations that can demonstrate strong grant management practices are more likely to attract funding and support from donors, grantors, and other stakeholders. By investing time and resources into developing and implementing sound grant management processes, organizations can position themselves for long-term success and sustainability.

Overall, grant management is a critical component of the grant funding process. Not only does it ensure accountability, compliance, and efficiency, but it also helps organizations make the most of the funds they receive. By prioritizing grant management and adopting best practices in this area, organizations can maximize their impact and effectively steward the resources entrusted to them.

In Conclusion

Be it Grant Management benefits statistics, Grant Management usage statistics, Grant Management productivity statistics, Grant Management adoption statistics, Grant Management roi statistics, Grant Management market statistics, statistics on use of Grant Management, Grant Management analytics statistics, statistics of companies that use Grant Management, statistics small businesses using Grant Management, top Grant Management systems usa statistics, Grant Management software market statistics, statistics dissatisfied with Grant Management, statistics of businesses using Grant Management, Grant Management key statistics, Grant Management systems statistics, nonprofit Grant Management statistics, Grant Management failure statistics, top Grant Management statistics, best Grant Management statistics, Grant Management statistics small business, Grant Management statistics 2024, Grant Management statistics 2021, Grant Management statistics 2024 you will find all from this page. 🙂

We tried our best to provide all the Grant Management statistics on this page. Please comment below and share your opinion if we missed any Grant Management statistics.




Leave a Comment