API Security Tools Statistics 2024 – Everything You Need to Know

by

Are you looking to add API Security Tools to your arsenal of tools? Maybe for your business or personal use only, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to know more about the most important API Security Tools statistics of 2024.

My team and I scanned the entire web and collected all the most useful API Security Tools stats on this page. You don’t need to check any other resource on the web for any API Security Tools statistics. All are here only 🙂

How much of an impact will API Security Tools have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your business? Should you invest in API Security Tools? We will answer all your API Security Tools related questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any word. 🙂

Best API Security Tools Statistics

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 96 API Security Tools Statistics on this page 🙂

API Security Tools Software Statistics

  • In a 2019 Forrester Research survey, 42% of organizations that had experienced an external attack blamed the incident on a software security flaw, and 35% said it had resulted from a buggy web application. [0]
  • The State of Application Security 2020, Forrester Research 37% Percentage of security pros that plan to implement container security during development About 20% of security professionals plan to implement container security during software design. [0]
  • However, 39% of firms surveyed still plan on doing software composition analysis only during the testing phase, where remediation is much harder. [0]
  • In its 2020 State of the Software Supply Chain report, opensource governance company Sonatype noted a 430% yearoveryear growth in attacks targeting open. [1]
  • A Sonatype survey of 679 software development professionals revealed that only 17% of organizations learn about open source vulnerabilities within a day of public disclosure. [1]
  • In the Java ecosystem, developers downloaded 226 billion open source software components from the Maven Central Repository in 2019, which was a 55% increase compared to 2018. [1]
  • A further analysis of 1,700 enterprise applications revealed that on average they contained 135 third party software components, of which 90% were open source. [1]

API Security Tools Latest Statistics

  • In a 2019 study, Gartner found that 40% of web enabled applications will have more surface area for attack in the form of exposed APIs rather than the user interface and predicted that the figure would rise to 90% by 2021. [2]
  • Salt Security’s “The State of API Security – Q1 2021” confirms many of those fears, finding that of the nearly 200 enterprise security officials surveyed, 91% experienced an API security incident last year. [2]
  • Within Salt’s own customer data, researchers found that 56% of customers faced between 10 and 55 attacks per month while 22% dealt with anywhere between 51 and 200 attacks each month. [2]
  • But with that increase in calls came a corresponding rise in malicious traffic targeted at APIs, with Salt Security measuring a 211% increase in malicious traffic in 2020. [2]
  • While small, the percentage of malicious traffic went from 0.45% of all customers’ API traffic to 1.40%. [2]
  • Alarmingly, the survey found that more than 25% of organizations running production APIs have no API security strategy at all. [2]
  • API security concerns have also been a reason why organizations have delayed the deployment of new applications, according to 66% of respondents. [2]
  • Over the last 12 months, 54% of respondents said they have found vulnerabilities in production APIs and another 48% said they had authentication problems. [2]
  • Almost 60% of respondents also said they use log files to identify attacks but a tenth of respondents said they had no way to identify any API attacks. [2]
  • Nearly 80% classified their current API attack identification systems as only “somewhat effective.”. [2]
  • The report said API documentation is often missing, incomplete, or inaccurate and found that 83% of respondents “lack confidence in their API inventory.”. [2]
  • Postman and Swagger were the most popular mechanisms used to inventory APIs, with 42% of respondents saying they used Postman while 41% used Swagger. [2]
  • Another 28% said they used the OpenAPI Generator. [2]
  • Almost 60% cited this as a risk related to API security that they were concerned about in addition to fears of account takeovers or misuse. [2]
  • More than 60% of respondents said one of the most valued tools they look for is the ability to identify which APIs expose personally identifiable information and the second most popular was the ability to stop attacks outright. [2]
  • Almost 85% of professionals who responded to the survey said they lacked confidence in knowing which APIs exposed personally identifiable information. [2]
  • Salt Security’s exploration of its customers found that 91% of APIs expose some kind of sensitive data, ranging from basic account information to personally identifiable information. [2]
  • In the survey, 22% said they had no idea which APIs exposed personally identifiable information and 57% said they rely on documentation that comes from developers. [2]
  • When asked who is responsible for monitoring the security of APIs, 25% said it was the job of developers at the enterprise whale. [2]
  • 21% said it was under the control of the DevSecOps team and 14% said they had an API team. [2]
  • Data from the Salt SaaS platform shows that overall API traffic increased 321% but malicious traffic grew 681%. [3]
  • API security concerns are inhibiting business innovation Nearly two thirds of respondents (62%). [3]
  • Another 13% are unsure if such concerns have caused this kind of disruption. [3]
  • 40% of Salt customers are suffering more than 100 attacks each month. [3]
  • The number of Salt customers experiencing 100 or more API attacks per month rose from 30% six months ago to 40% at the end of 2021. [3]
  • 95% of respondents suffered an API security incident in the last 12 months Survey respondents has endured a variety of API security incidents, but only 5% say they haven’t suffered any kind of incident. [3]
  • 34% of respondents lack any kind of API security strategy, despite running APIs in production. [3]
  • Only 11% have a strategy that includes dedicated API testing and protection. [3]
  • Nearly a quarter, 22%, cited worries over insufficient investment in pre production security, and another 18% noted their programs don’t adequately address runtime security. [3]
  • The vast majority of respondents have WAFs and API gateways in place, but 85% say their existing tools are not very effective in preventing API attacks. [3]
  • 83% of respondents are not very confident that their API inventory is complete Most organizations recognize that API documentation is nearly always incomplete and out of date. [3]
  • A healthy percentage (55%). [3]
  • With 40% of respondents noting their APIs are changing at least every week, hoping that developer documentation will remain accurate is a fallacy. [3]
  • Stopping API attacks remains the most valued attribute of an API security platform 40% of respondents cite outdated or “zombie” APIs as their top concern, nearly triple the number of the next biggest area of concern, account takeover. [3]
  • If you know your baseline for uptime is 98.5%, and you’re currently running at 98.6%, you can have real peace of mind. [4]
  • Besides, having access to real, hard baselines saves you from over engineering and expensive migrations that some consultants might recommend to push for “six nines” (99.9999% uptime). [4]
  • The results show that 91% of organizations in the survey suffered an API related problem last year. [5]
  • More than half (54%). [5]
  • Eighty three percent admitted to being unsure about their API inventory, and 82% lacked confidence in their knowledge about APIs that exposed PII, cardholder data, and other sensitive information. [5]
  • The number, which covers apps from 249 vendors, represents a 22.3% decrease from 2018 and a 33.3% decrease from the 19,954 vulnerabilities detected in 2017. [0]
  • According to the report, “Analysis suggests that the count of vulnerabilities disclosed in Q1 2020 may rise to 6,126 as further information comes to light, but will still represent a decline.”. [0]
  • The number of remotely exploitable flaws as a percentage of all flaws increased by 5.3% between 2018 and 2019. [0]
  • At the same time, flaws that could only be exploited on the local network decreased to 30.6% in 2019 from 33% in 2018. [0]
  • Other common vulnerabilities include cross site scripting errors (19%), PHP vulnerabilities (16%), remote code execution (7%), and sensitive file disclosure flaws (5%). [0]
  • The number represented a 12% increase over the 49% of tested applications with similar vulnerabilities in 2018. [0]
  • Nearly all of the attacks (99%). [0]
  • Some 63% of the websites had vulnerabilities that were classified as being of medium severity. [0]
  • Though the number of sites with cross site request forgery flaws in them remains high, this year’s number is 51% smaller than 2019’s. [0]
  • Other vulnerabilities present in a high percentage of websites include cross site scripting errors (25%) and vulnerable JavaScript libraries (24%). [0]
  • For example, though applications overall had an average of 12 SQL injection errors in them, the vulnerabilities existed only in 9% of tested applications. [0]
  • Percentage of application security vulnerabilities stemming from embeddable opensource and third party components Between 2018 and 2019 alone, there was a 50% increase in unpatched library vulnerabilities. [0]
  • Out of 1,253 commercial codebases analyzed, a full 100% contained open source code in nine of the 17 industries looked at. [0]
  • 2020 Open Source Security and Risk Analysis Report, Synopsys Nearly half (49%). [0]
  • Furthermore, 82% had open source components in them that were more than four years out of date, and 88% of the components had no development activity in at least two years. [0]
  • This number represents a 49% increase from the 298 open source components per codebase in 2018. [0]
  • While the percentage of codebases containing open source is nearing 100%, there has also been a dramatic, ongoing increase over the same period of the percentage of codebases comprising open source.”. [0]
  • 2020 Open Source Security and Risk Analysis Report, Synopsys 50%. [0]
  • For organizations that have implemented a mature DevSecOps approach, the average number of apps that are always vulnerable to attack is 22%. [0]
  • more, 77% of the respondents to this 2019 survey of 1,310 IT decision makers said similar communication was necessary between developers, operations, and security; 34% said the siloed nature of these functions makes it harder to create a DevOps culture. [0]
  • In the same survey of IT decision makers, 61% said it is important to foster greater integration between the different teams, and 50% said it is important to share learning experience across the different teams. [0]
  • Over the next two years, 68% of organizations plan to use DevSecOps practices to secure a majority of their cloud applications. [0]
  • Security for DevOps Enterprise Survey Report, Enterprise Strategy Group 37% Percentage of respondents who said API security is their top priority for cloud. [0]
  • About half of these organizations said they planned to merge these responsibilities with other teams in future; 32% plan on retaining a separate team for cloud application security. [0]
  • Security for DevOps Enterprise Survey Report, Enterprise Strategy Group 83%. [0]
  • The two other most common flaws uncovered during an initial scan were cryptographic vulnerabilities (62%) and CRLF injection (61%). [0]
  • Report author Edgescan also said, “On average 67.8% of assets had at least one CVE with a CVSS score of 4.0 or more. [0]
  • From a PCI DSS standpoint, this would result in an average of 67.8% of assets failing PCI compliance.”. [0]
  • Percentage of security pros who hadn’t patched their web application frameworks at all over the past 12 months Nearly six in 10 (59%). [0]
  • But 38% said they didn’t use a WAF because they don’t process sensitive information via their web apps. [0]
  • 32% Percentage of security decision makers that implemented IAST in their dev environment in 2019. [0]
  • Some 35% implement dynamic application security testing during the development phase. [0]
  • Over the next 12 months, more decision makers (39%) plan to implement interactive application security testing in development compared to DAST (34%). [0]
  • The State of Application Security 2020, Forrester Research 37% Percentage of organizations that plan to do SCA during development to reduce risk from vulnerable open. [0]
  • With the highest percentage of 5 star ratings, this is the third consecutive year Contrast has received this powerful endorsement from customers. [6]
  • The 40G can simulate up to 15 separate links from 100bps to 40Gbps in 1bps increments and emulate latency, packet loss, congestion, and other WAN impairments according to user specification. [7]
  • The most often cited reasons were meeting a critical deadline, the vulnerabilities being low risk or the issues being discovered too late in the release cycle (45%). [1]
  • In 28% of organizations the decision is taken by the development manager together with a security analyst, in 24% by the development manager alone and in 21% by a security analyst. [1]
  • Sixty percent of respondents admitted that their production applications were exploited through vulnerabilities listed in the OWASP Top 10 over the past 12 months. [1]
  • that assist with security issue identification and resolution (29%), scanning tools for images used in containers, repositories and microservices (29%), fuzzing tools (16%) and container runtime configuration security tools (15%). [1]
  • This is why in only 19% of organizations the application security testing task is formally owned by individual developers and in 26% by development managers. [1]
  • A third of organizations still have this task assigned to dedicated security analysts and in another 29% it’s jointly owned by the development and security teams. [1]
  • In a third of organizations less than half of developers are required to take formal security training and in only 15% of organizations is such training required for all developers. [1]
  • Less than half of organizations require developers to engage in formal security training more than once a year, with 16% expecting developers to self educate and 20% only offering training when a developer joins the team. [1]
  • Only 40% of organizations track security issue introduction and continuous improvement metrics for development teams or individual developers. [1]
  • Almost half of respondents in ESG’s survey said that opensource components make up over 50% of their code base and 8% said two thirds of their code is comprised of open. [1]
  • Despite that, only 48% of organizations have invested in controls to deal with open. [1]
  • According to the company, between February 2015 and June 2019, 216 such “next generation” supply chain attacks were reported, but from July 2019 to May 2020 an additional 929 attacks were documented, so this has become a very popular attack vector. [1]
  • It’s concerning that the University of Darmstadt research published last year revealed that nearly 40% of all npm packages contain or depend code with known vulnerabilities and that 66% vulnerabilities in npm packages remain unpatched. [1]
  • Eleven percent of those open source components had at least one vulnerability, but applications had on average 38 known vulnerabilities inherited from such components. [1]

I know you want to use API Security Tools, thus we made this list of best API Security Tools. We also wrote about how to learn API Security Tools and how to install API Security Tools. Recently we wrote how to uninstall API Security Tools for newbie users. Don’t forgot to check latest API Security Toolsstatistics of 2024.

Reference

  1. techbeacon – https://techbeacon.com/security/30-app-sec-stats-matter.
  2. csoonline – https://www.csoonline.com/article/3571268/the-state-of-application-security-what-the-statistics-tell-us.html.
  3. techrepublic – https://www.techrepublic.com/article/91-of-enterprise-pros-experienced-an-api-security-incident-in-2020/.
  4. salt – https://salt.security/api-security-trends.
  5. geekflare – https://geekflare.com/api-monitoring-tools/.
  6. darkreading – https://www.darkreading.com/application-security/concerns-over-api-security-grow-as-attacks-increase.
  7. contrastsecurity – https://www.contrastsecurity.com/.
  8. stanford – https://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/nmtf/nmtf-tools.html.

How Useful is Api Security Tools

API security tools play a vital role in securing APIs, which act as the gateway for communication between different software applications and services. These tools help identify vulnerabilities, enforce authentication and authorization measures, detect and prevent cyber threats, and monitor API traffic for any suspicious activity. By implementing API security tools, organizations can ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of their data and prevent unauthorized access and malicious attacks.

One of the key benefits of API security tools is their ability to provide real-time protection for APIs. With features such as threat intelligence, anomaly detection, and security analytics, these tools can quickly identify and respond to any potential security threats or breaches. This proactive approach to security significantly reduces the risk of data breaches, financial loss, and damage to a company’s reputation.

Additionally, API security tools offer organizations greater visibility and control over their APIs. By monitoring and securing API traffic, organizations can better understand who is accessing their APIs, what data is being transmitted, and how that data is being used. This visibility allows organizations to enforce strict security policies, track API usage, and detect and investigate any suspicious behavior.

API security tools also play a crucial role in compliance with data protection regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), and the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS). By implementing strong API security measures, organizations can ensure that sensitive data is protected and that they remain compliant with regulatory requirements.

However, it’s essential to recognize that API security tools are not a one-size-fits-all solution. While these tools provide organizations with a strong foundation for securing their APIs, they should be used in conjunction with other security measures such as data encryption, secure coding practices, and regular security audits. Organizations should also consider factors such as the complexity of their APIs, the sensitivity of the data being transmitted, and the potential risks associated with their APIs when selecting API security tools.

In conclusion, API security tools are undeniably valuable in helping organizations protect their APIs and safeguard sensitive data from cyber threats. By providing real-time protection, visibility, and compliance with regulatory requirements, these tools play a vital role in ensuring the security and integrity of API communications. However, it’s essential for organizations to implement a comprehensive security strategy that includes API security tools as part of a multi-layered approach to cybersecurity.

In Conclusion

Be it API Security Tools benefits statistics, API Security Tools usage statistics, API Security Tools productivity statistics, API Security Tools adoption statistics, API Security Tools roi statistics, API Security Tools market statistics, statistics on use of API Security Tools, API Security Tools analytics statistics, statistics of companies that use API Security Tools, statistics small businesses using API Security Tools, top API Security Tools systems usa statistics, API Security Tools software market statistics, statistics dissatisfied with API Security Tools, statistics of businesses using API Security Tools, API Security Tools key statistics, API Security Tools systems statistics, nonprofit API Security Tools statistics, API Security Tools failure statistics, top API Security Tools statistics, best API Security Tools statistics, API Security Tools statistics small business, API Security Tools statistics 2024, API Security Tools statistics 2021, API Security Tools statistics 2024 you will find all from this page. 🙂

We tried our best to provide all the API Security Tools statistics on this page. Please comment below and share your opinion if we missed any API Security Tools statistics.

Leave a Comment