Are you looking to add School Transportation to your arsenal of tools? Maybe for your business or personal use only, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to know more about the most important School Transportation statistics of 2024.
My team and I scanned the entire web and collected all the most useful School Transportation stats on this page. You don’t need to check any other resource on the web for any School Transportation statistics. All are here only 🙂
How much of an impact will School Transportation have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your business? Should you invest in School Transportation? We will answer all your School Transportation related questions here.
Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any word. 🙂
On this page, you’ll learn about the following:
Best School Transportation Statistics
☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 58 School Transportation Statistics on this page 🙂School Transportation Benefits Statistics
- National School Transportation Association www.yellowbuses.org of time to secure a CDL”, 38% the “availability of benefits” and 38% the “hours available to work”. [0]
School Transportation Latest Statistics
- 20 percent of low income families own no vehicles and the majority of children from these families take a school bus to school. [1]
- On the other hand, 99 percent of nonlow income families own at least one vehicle and the majority of children from these families take a private vehicle to school. [1]
- What about the 80 percent of low income families who do own at least one vehicle?. [1]
- School bus related crashes killed 54 people nationwide in 2020, down by over 50% compared to 2019 according to National Safety Council tabulations of data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. [2]
- It is likely that this sharp decline was a result of fewer school bus trips occurring during the COVID 19 pandemic in 2020. [2]
- From 2011 to 2020, about 70% of the deaths in school bus related crashes were occupants of vehicles other than the school bus, and 16% were pedestrians. [2]
- About 5% were school bus passengers, 5% were school bus drivers, and 3% were pedalcyclists. [2]
- Of the people injured in school bus related crashes from 2011 to 2020, about 33% were school bus passengers, 8% were school bus drivers, and 54% were occupants of other vehicles. [2]
- According to the Schoolbus Fleet, in the 2018 19 school year an estimated 479,867 yellow school buses provide transportation service daily in the United States. [2]
- Students are about 70 times more likely to get to school safely when taking a bus instead of traveling by car. [3]
- Under 49 U.S.C. 30101, et seq., a vehicle is regarded as being sold for use as a school bus if, at the time of sale, it is evident that the vehicle is likely to be significantly used to transport students to or from school or school. [3]
- Students transported at public expense Expenditures for transportation 1. [4]
- The number of students transported and the average expenditure per student transported were estimated based on data in January issues of School Bus Fleet for 1980–81 to 2000–01, and for 2007–08 and later years. [4]
- 20 percent of low income families own no vehicles and the majority of children from these families take a school bus to school. [5]
- On the other hand, 99 percent of nonlow income families own at least one vehicle and the majority of children from these families take a private vehicle to school. [5]
- What about the 80 percent of low income families who do own at least one vehicle?. [5]
- Almost half (46.6%). [6]
- Results were similar among those living ≤1mile (48.1%, PV to school; 41.3%, PV to home). [6]
- Among those living ≤1mile, 21.9% and 28.4% of children walked or bicycled to and from school, respectively. [6]
- According to the National School Transportation Association white paper, each day, 480,000 school buses circulate the country. [7]
- An average of 18% of students require special needs transportation, among which 6 percent use a wheelchair. [7]
- Only 9 percent of the fleet is equipped with an electronic ridership tracking system. [7]
- Only 20 percent of the US’s school bus fleet have seat belts available. [7]
- Despite the alarming reports of school bus accidents, in comparison to fatalities caused by other carriers, the American School Bus Council reports that the numbers are less than 1 percent for school buses. [7]
- Only 35% of children aged 5–17 years achieve recommended physical activity levels. [8]
- The low income cut off is a threshold below which a family will likely devote a larger share of its income than the average family on necessities. [8]
- Measurements using this observation protocol have been found to have high test retest reliability when observations were repeated at 10% of sampled schools, one week apart. [8]
- Housing stock metrics (% built prior to 1960). [8]
- Of the 30 variables on the survey, 90% had moderate to substantial agreement. [8]
- Results of the full models were presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). [8]
- Included schools ranged from 100% of eligible schools in Vancouver and Surrey to 23% of eligible schools in Montreal. [8]
- An average of 55% (SD 20%). [8]
- Table 2 shows the percentage of children using each travel mode across schools by city. [8]
- Across all schools, an average of 54.3% (SD 18.9%) of children used AST, ranging from 39.5% (SD 22.1%) in Laval to 69.7% (SD 18.1%). [8]
- Cycling was highest in Calgary at 7.7% (SD 6.6%), and lowest in Surrey at 1.4% (SD 1.6%). [8]
- The average proportion travelling to school by school bus was 16% (SD 23.1%). [8]
- Specifically, for every additional 100 children per km2, the odds of AST were 8% higher (OR 1.08 95% CI 1.05, 1.11). [8]
- Each additional 10% of the buffer allocated to residential land use was associated with a 4% lower odds of AST (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.94, 1.00). [8]
- OR (95% CI)City Vancouver . [8]
- AST was highly variable both across and within cities ranging from 39.5% in Laval to 69.7% in Montreal) and within cities (Montreal ranging from 0 to 95.6%). [8]
- Previous studies using the same observational methodology in Toronto and Vancouver found similar proportions to the current study (65% in Toronto, 62% in Vancouver). [8]
- , 2019).The differences in AST between cities most likely reflects the variability in density, diversity, and design of the built environment. [8]
- Although there was a relatively small proportion of children observed biking to school (maximum of 8% in Calgary). [8]
- The number of schools in each city ranged from 50 in Laval, to 125 in Calgary and the estimates from the city specific models should be interpreted in light of their precision (e.g., 95% CI). [8]
- Several cities had upwards of 60% of children using AST on average, but the high degree of variability between schools and between cities suggests opportunities to increase AST. [8]
- Each additional 10% of the buffer allocated to residential land use was associated with a 4% lower odds of AST (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.94, 1.00). [8]
- a Random effects beta regression full model (OR = Odds Ratios, 95% CI = Confidence Intervals). [8]
- a as 100% of schools in Surrey have parking lots for cars. [8]
- ParticipACTIONThe ParticipACTION Report Card on Physical Activity for Children and Youthhttps//participaction.cdn.prismic.io/participaction%2F38570bedb3254fc88855f15c9aebac12__participaction_report_card_. [8]
- 2.5% at 95% confidence Every region of the country is currently altering transportation service due to COVID. [0]
- Seventy nine percent (79%). [0]
- Ninety one percent (91%). [0]
- Fifty one percent (51%). [0]
- Roughly three quarters of all respondents (78%). [0]
- Roughly two thirds of all respondents (65%). [0]
- Only 1% of respondents indicated that bus driver shortage is not a problem for them. [0]
- In a question that allowed for multiple answers, 50% of respondents said the rate of pay is a major factor affecting their ability to recruit and retain drivers, 45% cited the “length National Association for Pupil Transportation www.napt.org. [0]
I know you want to use School Transportation Software, thus we made this list of best School Transportation Software. We also wrote about how to learn School Transportation Software and how to install School Transportation Software. Recently we wrote how to uninstall School Transportation Software for newbie users. Don’t forgot to check latest School Transportation statistics of 2024.
Reference
- napt – https://www.napt.org/blog_home.asp?Display=53.
- bts – https://www.bts.gov/topics/passenger-travel/back-school-2019.
- nsc – https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/motor-vehicle/road-users/school-bus/.
- nhtsa – https://www.nhtsa.gov/road-safety/school-bus-safety.
- ed – https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=67.
- dot – https://www.bts.dot.gov/newsroom/longer-route-school.
- nih – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28882273/.
- dmvlist – https://dmvlist.com/auto-blog/2020/03/03/school-buses-as-the-largest-transit-system-in-the-us-recent-stats/.
- sciencedirect – https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743521000542.
How Useful is School Transportation
Those in favor of school transportation emphasize the importance of providing a safe and reliable means of transportation for students to get to and from school. For many students, particularly those living in rural areas or in low-income communities, school buses are their only way of getting to school. Without school transportation, these students would have to rely on their parents or guardians to drive them to school, which may not always be possible due to work or other responsibilities. In such cases, students would likely miss out on valuable learning opportunities, ultimately affecting their academic performance and future prospects.
Furthermore, school transportation plays a crucial role in promoting equity in education. By providing transportation to students who live further away from school or who may not have the means to get themselves to school, educational institutions help level the playing field and ensure that all students have equal access to educational opportunities. This is especially important in a society where disparities in income and resources can create barriers to education for certain groups of students. School transportation serves as an important tool in breaking down these barriers and promoting educational equity for all students.
On the other hand, critics of school transportation argue that the costs associated with providing transportation services to students are significant and could be better spent on other educational resources. They point out that school transportation consumes a large portion of school budgets, money that could potentially be used to improve classroom instruction, hire more teachers, or invest in technology and equipment. In an era where schools are often facing budget constraints and competing demands for resources, some question the value of continuing to allocate funds to school transportation.
Critics also argue that advancements in technology and changes in society have made school transportation less necessary than it once was. With the rise of ridesharing services and the increasing availability of affordable and efficient public transportation options, some argue that students and families have more alternatives to traditional school buses than ever before. In this context, some wonder whether school transportation is a relic of a bygone era, one that may no longer be as essential or cost-effective as it once was.
In conclusion, school transportation remains a hotly debated issue in education policy. While providing transport for students ensures equal access to education and helps promote equity in our educational system, some question whether the costs associated with school transportation are justified in today’s context. As schools and policymakers grapple with these questions, it is important to consider the broader implications of school transportation for students and communities, and to carefully weigh the costs and benefits of continuing to provide transportation services for students.
In Conclusion
Be it School Transportation benefits statistics, School Transportation usage statistics, School Transportation productivity statistics, School Transportation adoption statistics, School Transportation roi statistics, School Transportation market statistics, statistics on use of School Transportation, School Transportation analytics statistics, statistics of companies that use School Transportation, statistics small businesses using School Transportation, top School Transportation systems usa statistics, School Transportation software market statistics, statistics dissatisfied with School Transportation, statistics of businesses using School Transportation, School Transportation key statistics, School Transportation systems statistics, nonprofit School Transportation statistics, School Transportation failure statistics, top School Transportation statistics, best School Transportation statistics, School Transportation statistics small business, School Transportation statistics 2024, School Transportation statistics 2021, School Transportation statistics 2024 you will find all from this page. 🙂
We tried our best to provide all the School Transportation statistics on this page. Please comment below and share your opinion if we missed any School Transportation statistics.