Barcode Statistics 2024 – Everything You Need to Know

• *** 50% failure rate for buyonline and pickupin store shopping due to inventory inaccuracy. ^[3]

Barcode Adoption Statistics

• Moreover, according to the Snap Consumer AR Global Report 2021, the adoption rate of AR has increased rapidly. ^[0]

Barcode Latest Statistics

• Reduce medication errors by more than 50%* Reduce adverse drug reactions by 75%. ^[3]
• 80% of retailers are not confident of their product data. ^[3]
• *** 84% of shoppers use their devices to scan and help them shop. ^[3]
• *** 86% of shoppers are unlikely to buy products from a brand after an experience with inaccurate product data. ^[3]
• *** Inventory inaccuracy accounts for 8.7% of lost sales. ^[3]
• *** 71% of shoppers expect to view in. ^[3]
• The number of American warehouses has grown about 15% since 2010+ Implementation of barcodes in electronic medication administration records and medication administration significantly improved patient safety. ^[3]
• ** US retailers have about $1.43 in inventory for every $1 of sales++ Inaccurate transactional data can cost up to 25% more in labor alone. ^[3]
• *** there is a 15% to 30% increase in sales when buyonline and pickupin store fulfillment is available. ^[3]
• To have more than a 95% chance of assigning the sequence to the correct species, the divergence time must be larger than 2.7 when θ = 5.0 and 4.6 when θ = 1.0. ^[4]
• θ = 1), the probability of assigning the sequence to the wrong species is larger than 5% until T/N is larger than 3. ^[4]
• This procedure can be modified to evaluate Equation 4 by allowing the identity of an individual to be a random variable, with prior probability of belonging to each species of 50%. ^[4]
• In sharp contrast to the butterflies, our second example—four species of the Australian rainforest frogs of the genus Litoria—displayed intraspecific COI sequence often exceeding 10% pairwise difference. ^[4]
• Thanks to the increase in global smartphone penetration that went from 59.01% in 2017 to 78.05% in 2020. ^[0]
• And access to high speed mobile internet increased from 48.8% in 2014 to 62.5% in Feb 2024. ^[0]
• In addition to this, internet users have grown by 4% from Jan 2021 to Feb 2024. ^[0]
• Here, 92.1% of device ownership belongs to mobile phone users. ^[0]
• Of the total participants from Germany, a good 29% had used a QR Code. ^[0]
• This number was 28% for France, and 26% for the UK and the US. ^[0]
• Hence, we can safely say that in general, 25 30% of populations in developed nations use QR Codes. ^[0]
• They were as follows 8% in North America 13% in Latin America 15% in the Asia Pacific 10% in Europe and Middle East Asia. ^[0]
• According to a recent survey by Statista, in the US alone, an estimated 11 Million households were forecast to have scanned a QR Code in 2020. ^[0]
• This would have meant an increase from an estimated 9.76 Million scans in 2018. ^[0]
• As per a report by Gartner, 80% of the order, checkout, and payment services will become contactless by 2024. ^[0]
• A good 42.55 % felt most secure at a restaurant, bar, or café. ^[0]
• On the other hand, 19.4 % felt the same level of assurance at a gym, pool, or any other fitness center. ^[0]
• According to it, 64% supported the introduction of the system with passes, QR Codes, and other similar movements within the system. ^[0]
• Well, because it went from 12% in 2017 to 18% in 2018. ^[0]
• Among the respondents, over half of the respondents (54%). ^[0]
• The same study also shows that two thirds of respondents (67%). ^[0]
• Moreover, over half of the respondents (58%). ^[0]
• 96% growth in QR Code Reach 94% surge in the number of interactions 98% increase in the number of interactions per object. ^[0]
• According to Juniper Research, by 2024, 5.3 billion QR Code coupons will be redeemed via smartphones. ^[0]
• And in 2018, an estimated 3.27 Million households obtained a coupon via a QR Code. ^[0]
• According to a 2015 study by Scanlife, here is the distribution of global QR Code scanning audience by age. ^[0]
• The age group with the highest percentage of people scanning QR Codes was 34. ^[0]
• This shows that this age distribution in 2018 is likely to shift towards the younger generation. ^[0]
• According to CNN Tech, USD 1.65 Trillion in transactions was done via QR Codes in China in 2016. ^[0]
• Also, according to a 2015 survey by TNS Infratest and Google, the Chinese also lead in the percentage of people who have scanned a QR Code while shopping. ^[0]
• According to a study from 2018, 70% of China’s population regularly uses QR Codes for payments. ^[0]
• As per Tencent’s 2020 Pandemic report, for the first quarter itself, the economy from WeChat QR Codes shot up by 25.86% regardless of the tough macroenvironment. ^[0]
• According to a study, 40% of India’s population regularly used QR Codes for payments in 2018. ^[0]
• Globally, 4% of all consumer transactions are via QR Codes. ^[0]
• Moreover, it is estimated that by 2025, 29% percent of global mobile users will be using QR Code payments. ^[0]
• According to McKinsey & Company, there is an 80/20 rise in digital payments. ^[0]
• That means the digital user base has seen a 20% increase, where 80% has been registered during the peak of Covid. ^[0]
• It reported that 86.66% of smartphone users had scanned a QR Code at least once in their lifetime. ^[0]
• And 36.40 % scan at least one QR Code a week. ^[0]
• In addition to this, 46.81% of respondents agreed that QR codes make life easier in a touchless world. ^[0]
• A good 38.99% of respondents want to see QR Codes used more broadly in the future. ^[0]
• In fact, according to the latest Restaurant Readiness Index report, 33% of the restaurant owners have accepted that QR Codes have enhanced their business. ^[0]
• 57% of users had scanned a food QR Code to get specific information about the product. ^[0]
• And 43% had scanned a food QR Code to visit the brand’s website. ^[0]
• Moreover, 34% of the Canadian consumers scanned a food QR Code to get information about the product or company and to enter a contest. ^[0]
• And it is estimated that by 2025, 75% of the total global population will become frequent users of AR. ^[0]
• The report also highlights that there has been a 94% increase in customer conversion rates thanks to the AR on products. ^[0]
• In a study conducted in 2019 by Global Web Index , the QR code Global percentage of QR code users was 8% in North America, 13% in 15% in Pacific Asia, and 10% in Europe and Middle East Asia. ^[1]
• A study shows that only 6.2% of smartphone users in the US have scanned a QR code back in 2011. ^[1]
• In 2012, the INC magazine also stated that 97% of the consumers did not know what a QR code is. ^[1]
• From the year 2018, the QR code interaction grew by 94% in 2020. ^[1]
• Which led to the increase of QR code reach by 96% in the same period. ^[1]
• In another September 2020 survey by Statista , it found that 18.8 percent of consumers in the United States strongly agreed that they had noticed an increase in QR code use since the beginning of COVID19 related shelterin place orders in March 2020. ^[1]
• According to PYMNTS , 11 million households in the US are predicted to use QR codes this year to make payments. ^[1]
• QR code is also widely used in food labels and packaging Statista report says that 57% scanned a food QR code to get specific information about the product. ^[1]
• This is followed by 43 percent of the Canadian consumers that said they have scanned a food QR code to visit the brand’s website Statista. ^[1]
• Furthermore, 34% of the consumers scanned a QR code on food labels to get information about the product or company and to enter a contest. ^[1]
• While 25% scanned the code to get a recipe and only 9% scanned it to play a game. ^[1]
• Statista’s survey shows that during the survey period, 16 percent of male respondents used their smartphones to scan QR codes to obtain information. ^[1]
• While only 10 percent of female respondents stated they used their smartphones to scan barcodes or QR codes to obtain more information. ^[1]
• According to a 2019 Statista report , 46 percent of the Ecuadorian population owned a smartphone, up from 6.2 percent in 2012. ^[1]
• In a study conducted by Statista, it was recorded that only 5% of European consumers scanned a QR code while shopping. ^[1]
• While only 9% of the German population had scanned a QR code. ^[1]
• In a study conducted by MobileIron poll , over half of the respondents, or 54% noticed the increase in QR codes. ^[1]
• The same study also shows that 72% have scanned a QR code the month before the study was conducted. ^[1]
• 67% of the respondents agreed that these codes make life easier while 58% favor its great use. ^[1]
• Data shows that over 30% are providing QR codes while 40% are interested in providing one in the future. ^[1]
• There 40% of the Indian population uses QR codes, 27% of the Vietnamese, and 23% of Thai consumers. ^[1]
• That value has significantly increased in succeeding years, especially since according to a 2019 survey, 50% of QR code scanners manage to regularly scan QR codes several times a week. ^[1]
• In 2018, although 74% were aware of QR code based payment in Thailand, only 23% used these QR codes regularly in their payment transactions. ^[1]
• This number increased after the pandemic and was recorded to reach 63% in May 2021. ^[1]
• Which is above the global average of 56%. ^[1]
• Also, 15% of the population in the Philippines, South Korea, and Singapore are using QR codes as a payment method. ^[1]
• As the mobile penetration rate in Algeria stands at over 111% and with most students are having the access to these gadgets, schools in Algeria are also using QR codes for a blended and interactive learning approach. ^[1]
• From 2018 to 2019, a total of 26% increase in interactions was observed. ^[1]
• Repeat engagement on the other hand showed an increase of 35%, suggesting that people are scanning a QR code not just once. ^[1]
• In terms of overall population reach, QR code statistics saw a growth of 28% in the same 2018 to 2019 time frame. ^[1]
• According to a recent study by Juniper Research, 90% of the world’s population will have access to high. ^[1]
• South Africa is just one of the regions in the world that are economically challenged but is set to have 80% of its population own a smartphone in 2021. ^[1]
• Topping the list of smartphone penetration in the United Kingdom with almost 83% of its population already owning one. ^[1]
• According to Apple, 92% of its devices are QR code. ^[1]
• Researchers recently estimated there are about 8.7 million eukaryotic species, of which about 2 million are named. ^[5]
• Does an analogous approach of sequencing the whole eukaryotic biome of 8.7 million predicted species make sense?. ^[5]
• DNA barcoding aims to assign individuals to given species according to their sequence at a small locus, generally part of the CO1 mitochondrial gene. ^[6]
• Table 2 Success rate (%). ^[6]
• mtDNA sequences were simulated for a reference sample size Table 5 Success rate (%). ^[6]
• For this model, the performance of the various assignment methods ranged from an 86.30% to 87.25% success rate for θ = 3 and from a 93.50% to 96.20% success rate for θ = 30. ^[6]
• For a speciation time of Nf/10 , all methods performed very poorly with a success rate under 66% for a small mutation rate. ^[6]
• Note however that all methods already reached a success rate of about 75% for this low speciation time when polymorphism was increased. ^[6]
• Contrastingly, almost all methods showed a 100% success rate for very long separation times. ^[6]
• For instance, for the 1 NN method with θ = 3, the success rate was only 78.35% for n = 3 but was 91.05% for n = 25. ^[6]
• For the Astraptes data set , all methods performed well with a success rate around 99%. ^[6]
• All other methods had a success rate above 90%, except PhyML and the kernel method for cowries at the subspecies level. ^[6]
• Similarly, almost all methods had similar success rates of above 90% for the three Amazonian butterfly data sets. ^[6]
• Table 6 Success rate (%). ^[6]
• By focusing on the closest neighbour, 1 NN is less likely to be misled by individuals of a wrong species that would share many mutations with the query sequence. ^[6]
• Estimating the θ value of the different species, for instance with [37] estimate, may provide some indication on the method that is likely to be the best for the data set in question. ^[6]
• Increasing the reference sample size had a strong positive effect on the success of methods it increased from as much as 78% to 91% in certain cases. ^[6]
• Compared to perfect matching, imperfect matching mapped an additional 3.64%, 3.55% and 2.59% reads in NE, ERG and MRG samples. ^[7]
• Overall, the additional read counts were 56,015 (0.25%), 45,321 (0.27%) and 40,450 (0.18%) from 21, 17 and 13 erroneous barcodes, and 762,929 (3.39%), 558,448 (3.28%) and 543,790 (2.41%). ^[7]
• When we mapped a total of 288,215,818 reads to 87,437 sgRNAs from the yusa library, we identified 72 erroneous barcodes (0.08%). ^[7]
• Here, the additional read counts were 81,355 (0.03%) from 72 erroneous reads and 15,406,665 (5.34%) from sequencing or PCR errors . ^[7]
• As a result, Barcas generated 8% more reads than the edgeR package and bowtie. ^[7]
• 62% of small business leaders surveyed feel that there is nothing else their accountant could do to reduce taxes. ^[8]
• 70% of small businesses outsource tax preparation. ^[8]
• 88% of small businesses say they are either very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with their accounting services. ^[8]
• Only 42% of small businesses have a CFO or controller. ^[8]
• Only 17% of companies have an asset management system in place to track physical assets. ^[8]
• 47% of small business owners don’t understand how ghost assets impact their books. ^[8]
• A preCOVID 19 study found that 75% of people stay away from bars and restaurants with negative reviews about cleanliness. ^[9]
• According to Professor Cihan Cobanoglu, director of the M3 Center for Hospitality & Innovation at the University of South Florida, “contactless menus will be a key point for restaurants to adopt.”. ^[9]
• The use of arbitrary and fixed distance cutoffs to separate out all taxa, such as the well known 2% heuristic . ^[10]
• Using the Barcode Gap Analysis tool available through the BOLD Workbench, results revealed a total of 29 species (19.1%). ^[10]
• One species, Paraliparis pectoralis, had a maximum withinspecies distance of 2.27% . ^[10]
• Another species, the Deepwater bristlemouth , displayed a maximum intraspecific distance of 9.22% (nearest neighbor distance 22.78%; nearest species Stout blacksmelt (Pseudobathylagus milleri). ^[10]
• All other maximum within species distances were below 2%. ^[10]
• , it is still impossible to directly discern how reliable reported genetic distance measures are, and therefore the trustworthiness of estimated DNA barcode gaps.4. ^[10]
• The term “divergence” is used in the phylogenetics literature to express differences in either number of mutations or amount of time separating taxa (e.g., species differing by 2% per million years). ^[10]
• Most species assessed here [146 of 152 species (96.1%). ^[10]
• A horizontal line is then drawn at the 1% mark , allowing for good separation of intra specific distances from nearest neighbor distances. ^[10]
• Most sampled species are resolved at the 1% log level of genetic distance. ^[10]
• Points fall into one of four categories in positive Cartesian space, depending on a predefined species distance cutoff (2% typically). ^[10]
• Here, a 2% distance threshold is assumed to separate most taxa. ^[10]
• The blue dot at the approximate point within Quadrant II represents Cyclothone atraria, a likely cryptic species complex. ^[10]
• In addition, the default 95% detection limit employed within TCS is largely arbitrary; users can set this value to range anywhere from 90–99%. ^[10]
• Mathematically,where d0 is a predefined cutoff for species separation (say, d0 = 2%). ^[10]
• Because a test statistic need not be known in advance, bootstrap results can be immediately used to form appropriate level (e.g., 95%). ^[10]
• Several barcoding campaigns dedicated to monitoring fisheries bycatch over the years have resulted in a hypothetical library that is 98% complete. ^[10]
• A nearest neighbor assignment with an arbitrary 1–2% threshold will correctly identify most queries to the species level, except in the case of barcode haplotype sharing. ^[10]
• Barcoding efforts have resulted in a library that is only 60% complete, where most species are represented by less than three sequences. ^[10]
• , it is still impossible to directly discern how reliable reported genetic distance measures are, and therefore the trustworthiness of estimated DNA barcode gaps. ^[10]
• Mathematically, where d0 is a predefined cutoff for species separation (say, d0 = 2%). ^[10]
• Here, we show that ~1321% of cell barcodes from the 10x Chromium scATAC seq assay may have been derived from a droplet with more than one oligonucleotide sequence, which we call “barcode multiplets”. ^[11]
• First, we confirm that approximately 4% of droplets from the 10x platform may contain multiple beads. ^[11]
• Additionally, we find that approximately 5% of beads may contain detectable levels of multiple oligonucleotide barcodes. ^[11]
• gPercent difference of the mean log2 fragments between pairs of barcodes within a multiplet. ^[11]
• An estimated 11 million households will scan a QR Code in 2020 in the USA alone. ^[2]
• The Middle East and Africa were gradually increasing QR Codes’ use from a low 12% in Q1 2017 to 18% in 2018. ^[2]
• In China, 50% of users scan QR Codes several times a week. ^[2]
• The Deloitte Mobile Consumer Survey 2019 found that approximately 90% of Australians use smartphones and a Roy Morgan report shows that about one in ten smartphone owners (10.8%). ^[2]
• UnionPay Internation QR Code payment is available at 450,000 acceptance points outside of Mainland China, which is up 50% when compared to the first half of 2019. ^[2]
• The highest penetration of QR Code based on use cases is for product information (51.5%) followed closely by event information (19.8%), to avail offers (12.5%), and app downloads (8.2%). ^[2]
• The top source of brand discovery for people who use QR Codes are search engines (45%), TV advertisements (43%). ^[2]
• In 2014, global mobile penetration was just about 48.8%, has increased nearly by 13% today. ^[2]
• Nearly 90% of the world’s population will have access to high speed internet, attributing to the rise of QR Codes by 2020. ^[2]
• The purpose and the mass reach of social media QR Codes are estimated to grow in folds by 2020. ^[2]
• 52% of them have already switched to QR code menus and the others are catching up. ^[2]
• The company witnessed more than 90% engagement with the help of QR Codes. ^[2]
• In China, 65% of consumers think scanning QR Codes on product packaging instills a blanket of trust. ^[2]
• In Brazil, 75% of shoppers are ready to scan QR Codes on a regular basis to access shopping assistance. ^[2]
• In the Asia Pacific region, China, Korea, and Japan have witnessed an 83% increase in the use of QR Codes on product packages between 2014 and 2018. ^[2]
• 91% of active iOS users have access to QR Code scanners due to the installation of iOS 12 and above. ^[2]
• In Vietnam, the most popular QR Code app used is Zalo (83%). ^[2]
• Chickfil A boosted its app downloads by 14% after using QR Codes in its digital signage. ^[2]
• Thus, it is fair to say that about 60 65% of people use QR Codes on a daily basis for the abovementioned uses. ^[2]
• Characteristic Percentage of users Strongly agree 18.8% Agree 27.95%. ^[12]
• Strongly disagree 4.64% Register for free Log in. ^[12]
• Most recent QR code scan according to U.S. and UK consumers 2020. ^[12]

I know you want to use Barcode Software, thus we made this list of best Barcode Software. We also wrote about how to learn Barcode Software and how to install Barcode Software. Recently we wrote how to uninstall Barcode Software for newbie users. Don’t forgot to check latest Barcode statistics of 2024.

Reference

1. scanova – https://scanova.io/blog/qr-code-statistics/.
2. qrcode-tiger – https://www.qrcode-tiger.com/qr-code-statistics.
3. beaconstac – https://blog.beaconstac.com/2019/12/qr-code-statistics/.
4. barcode-test – https://barcode-test.com/barcode-quality-training/barcode-statistics/.
5. oup – https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/article/55/1/162/2842926.
6. rockefeller – https://phe.rockefeller.edu/barcode/blog/2012/11/14/barcode-stats-reveal-progress-challenges-opportunities/.
7. biomedcentral – https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2105-10-S14-S10.
8. biomedcentral – https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-016-1326-9.
9. waspbarcode – https://www.waspbarcode.com/buzz/small-businesses-accounting-stats.
10. sproutqr – https://www.sproutqr.com/blog/qr-codes-dead.
11. frontiersin – https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2024.859099/full.
12. nih – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32054859/.
13. statista – https://www.statista.com/statistics/199328/qr-code-scanners-by-age/.

How Useful is Barcode

The beauty of barcodes lies in their simplicity. A series of black and white lines of varying thickness and spacing, these codes contain valuable information about a product that can be scanned quickly and accurately. This information can include the item’s price, description, and even expiration date, making the checkout process at stores more efficient and reducing the chance of human error.

Furthermore, barcodes have revolutionized inventory management for businesses of all sizes. Gone are the days of painstakingly counting and tracking items manually. With the use of barcode scanners and inventory software, businesses can now accurately track their stock levels in real-time, leading to fewer out-of-stock situations and improved overall efficiency in operations.

In addition, barcodes have also proved invaluable in the healthcare industry. Patients receive barcode wristbands upon admission, which are scanned by healthcare professionals to ensure accurate administration of medication and medical procedures. This not only reduces the risk of medical errors but also enhances patient safety and care.

Beyond the retail and healthcare sectors, barcodes have found their way into a myriad of other applications as well. They are used in logistics and shipping to track packages and ensure accurate delivery. They are used in event tickets and boarding passes, making check-in processes smoother and faster. They are even used in advertising, with QR codes linking directly to websites or promotions.

But despite all their advantages, barcodes are not without limitations. Not all barcodes are created equal, and not all can be scanned easily or accurately. Some barcodes are easily damaged or obscured, rendering them unreadable. While advancements such as 2D barcodes have improved data capacity and readability, there is still room for improvement in terms of standardization and interoperability.

Furthermore, as technology continues to advance, some argue that barcodes may soon become obsolete. With the rise of technologies such as RFID (radio-frequency identification) and Near Field Communication (NFC), which allow for contactless scanning and data transmission, some question the long-term viability of barcodes.

Despite these challenges, barcodes remain a ubiquitous and indispensable tool in our modern world. Their simplicity, versatility, and cost-effectiveness make them a preferred choice for businesses and consumers alike. And while newer technologies may offer different advantages, barcodes continue to prove their worth in a wide range of applications.

In conclusion, the usefulness of barcodes cannot be denied. From simplifying the checkout process at stores to improving inventory management and patient safety, barcodes have revolutionized the way we do business and interact with products. While they may face challenges from newer technologies in the future, their proven track record and widespread adoption ensure that they will remain an essential tool for years to come.

In Conclusion

Be it Barcode benefits statistics, Barcode usage statistics, Barcode productivity statistics, Barcode adoption statistics, Barcode roi statistics, Barcode market statistics, statistics on use of Barcode, Barcode analytics statistics, statistics of companies that use Barcode, statistics small businesses using Barcode, top Barcode systems usa statistics, Barcode software market statistics, statistics dissatisfied with Barcode, statistics of businesses using Barcode, Barcode key statistics, Barcode systems statistics, nonprofit Barcode statistics, Barcode failure statistics, top Barcode statistics, best Barcode statistics, Barcode statistics small business, Barcode statistics 2024, Barcode statistics 2021, Barcode statistics 2024 you will find all from this page. 🙂

We tried our best to provide all the Barcode statistics on this page. Please comment below and share your opinion if we missed any Barcode statistics.