Blockchain Analysis Statistics 2024 - Everything You Need to Know

Are you looking to add Blockchain Analysis to your arsenal of tools? Maybe for your business or personal use only, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to know more about the most important Blockchain Analysis statistics of 2024.

My team and I scanned the entire web and collected all the most useful Blockchain Analysis stats on this page. You don’t need to check any other resource on the web for any Blockchain Analysis statistics. All are here only 🙂

How much of an impact will Blockchain Analysis have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your business? Should you invest in Blockchain Analysis? We will answer all your Blockchain Analysis related questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any word. 🙂

On this page, you’ll learn about the following:

Best Blockchain Analysis Statistics

Best Blockchain Analysis Statistics

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 209 Blockchain Analysis Statistics on this page 🙂

Blockchain Analysis Market Statistics

In particular, bitcoin is considered the most important cryptocurrency, being the first to be created and having nearly 40% of the total cryptocurrency market cap on May 15th, 2018. ^[0]
The blockchain market grew by 10.27% in 2020. ^[1]
In 2020, North America contributed 46% of the growth of the global blockchain technology market. ^[1]
In 2020, Bitcoin dominated the market with 66% market capitalization, followed by Ether (8%), and Ripple (4%). ^[1]
Meanwhile, Litecoin only had 1% market capitalization and Monero at 0.5%. ^[1]
In addition, other cryptocurrencies cumulatively had 7% market capitalization. ^[1]
The US has the most number of cryptocurrency ATMs at 14,112 ATMs or 83.2% of the global market share. ^[1]
The global crypto market cap is $1.81T, a 0.21% increase over the last day. ^[2]
In particular, bitcoin is considered the most important cryptocurrency, being the first to be created and having nearly 40% of the total cryptocurrency market cap on May 15th, 2018. ^[3]
The global blockchain in retail market size was valued at $83 million in 2018, and is projected to reach $11.18 billion by 2026, registering a CAGR of 84.6% from 2019 to 2026. ^[4]
The financial sector currently accounts for more than 60% of blockchain’s worldwide market value. ^[5]
The technology has spread to other sectors as well manufacturing (17.6% of the market share), distribution and services (14.6%), public sector (4.2%), and infrastructure (3.1%). ^[5]
If a strategy results in the number of profitable trades > 50% and/or total profits from trading are > 0, then we conclude that there is a market anomaly. ^[6]
Out of the entire dataset, 23% of projects can be classified as marketready, 67% can be said to be in development, and 10% identified as inactive. ^[7]
The greatest proportion of projects that can be classified as market ready are from 2014, 2015, and 2017 with 50%, 38% and 31% of projects respectively. ^[7]
2016 appears to be an anomaly with only 14% of projects from that year appearing to be market. ^[7]
The greatest proportion of projects that appear to be marketready occurred in 2017; 35% of all market ready projects were created in that year. ^[7]
Of interest is that greatest proportion of projects that appear market ready are Hyperledger based, with 33% of projects with this status. ^[7]
Other interesting points to note are that many projects that appear to be marketready have not revealed what blockchain technologies that they are working with, which is for example why 16% of projects with market ready status are in the TBC category. ^[7]
Of all the projects that utilize Hyperledger, 47% of them are indevelopment, 36% of them are market ready and only 2% appear inactive. ^[7]
Compared to all Ethereum projects, 50% appear to be indevelopment, 21% appear to be market ready, and 15% appear to be inactive. ^[7]
Finally of all Ethereum projects, 21% appear to be market ready compared with 23% from the entire dataset. ^[7]
Moreover, we find that of all Hyperledger projects, 36% appear to have a market. ^[7]
This percentage is higher than the projects that appear market ready in the entire dataset (23%). ^[7]
This is confirmed in Figure 3 where we see that projects created in 2014 and 2015 have a market ready status at 50% and 38%, respectively. ^[7]
With respect to project status and organizations, the greatest proportion (29%). ^[7]
Public companies are much more likely to exhibit this behavior, and indeed, we see this in the case of Hyperledger with 24% of all market ready projects coming from public companies and 31% of all public companies utilizing Hyperledger with this status. ^[7]
Indeed, we can observe that Ethereum has more market ready projects than Hyperledger in the Freight/Logistics sector (46% of those projects compared to 20%). ^[7]
Furthermore, looking at the dataset, out of all startups, only 29% of these projects are identifiable as market ready, vs the entire dataset average of 23%. ^[7]
Compared to public companies, for instance, here, 17% of projects are identifiable as market. ^[7]
Small businesses continue being the smallest investors in cybersecurity despite making up 13% of the cybercrime market. ^[8]

Blockchain Analysis Adoption Statistics

On the one hand, the majority of senior executives think blockchain is set for broad scale adoption yet only around 40% say that they have adopted it within their organization. ^[1]
Overall Adoption of Blockchain Technology 88% of senior executives think that blockchain technology will eventually achieve mainstream adoption. ^[1]
According to projections of blockchain trends, the early adoption phase will end in 2024. ^[5]
findings according to which knowledge sharing and trading partner pressure lead to successful outcomes for the adoption of blockchain in supply chains. ^[7]

Blockchain Analysis Latest Statistics

Moving to the commodity definition, according to the Cornell Law School, under the US Code, General Provisions, Chapter 1, § 1ª –Definition states that commodities are material goods as well as services, rights, and interests. ^[0]
[32] expose a fall of nearly 60% from the peak value of the cryptocurrency as an initial indication of the existence of this phenomenon. ^[0]
By analyzing the p values of the test, the null hypothesis is rejected, so the alternative, in which the sample does not come from the Gaussian distribution, is not rejected under a 99% confidence level. ^[0]
However, as stated in the literature [44], the CVaR is a better approximation for studying risk exposure because the expected losses surpass the VaR level. ^[0]
According to [7], the wild fluctuations in Bitcoin price cannot be explained by economic and financial theory. ^[9]
Supporting this analysis, there is an indication that “popular exchanges are more likely to suffer security breaches” [8], something which one might expect. ^[9]
Using raw annualised data over a four year period from 2010 to 2014 and adjusted data, taking account of volume of transactions, they find that Bitcoin shows the highest annualised volatility of percentage change in daily exchange rates. ^[9]
Hence, by the inversion theorem of [65], the cdf ofTcan be expressed asYis thereforeis thereforenVarious high and low percentiles of Y for nn= 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000 are given inTable 9. ^[9]
In particular, the log returns will be greater than 2.282 × 10−1 with 1 percent chance and will be less than −2.043 × 10−1 with 1 percent chance. ^[9]
Also, the log returns will be greater than 4.539 × 10−1 with 0.1 percent chance and will be less than −4.108 × 10−1 with 0.01 percent chance. ^[9]
In particular, the exchange rate in about six years from the 13th of September 2011 could exceed 10172920 with 1 percent chance and could be less than 13.36 with 1 percent chance. ^[9]
Also, the exchange rate in about nine years from the 13th of September 2011 could exceed 4637660718 with 1 percent chance and could be less than 146.519 with 1 percent chance. ^[9]
Worldwide spend on blockchain solutions is forecast to reach $17.9 billion by 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate of 46.4%. ^[1]
Experts predict that blockchain will boost global GDP by $1.76 trillion by 2030, which is equivalent to 1.4% of global GDP. ^[1]
In 2020, the industry with the largest blockchain spend was banking at 29.7%. ^[1]
Other big spenders on blockchain technology are process manufacturing (11.4%), discrete manufacturing (10.9%), professional services (6.6%), and retail (6%). ^[1]
The professional services industry is expected to have the fastest growth in blockchain spending, at a CAGR of 54%. ^[1]
This is followed by healthcare (43.9%) and state and local government (48.2%). ^[1]
In contrast, 50% of IT leaders said that they were not interested in adopting blockchain solutions. ^[1]
In a survey, 39% of senior executives from around the world said that they have adopted blockchain technologies in their organizations. ^[1]
41% of these companies had a revenue of more than $100 million. ^[1]
Meanwhile, 46% had a revenue of more than $1 billion. ^[1]
Adoption of blockchain as a top strategic priority is strongest in China, where 70% agreed that blockchain is in their top five list of priorities. ^[1]
On the other hand, only 42% of organizations in Germany see it as a priority. ^[1]
The top use cases for blockchain for organizations worldwide are digital currency (33%), data access and sharing (32%), and data reconciliation (31%). ^[1]
Other popular use cases include identity protection (31%), payments (30%), and tracking and tracing (27%). ^[1]
Meanwhile, another study revealed that 36% of IT leaders are actively searching for blockchain security solutions. ^[1]
However, 50% of IT leaders were not interested in adopting blockchain security solutions. ^[1]
40% of organizations said that they planned to invest $5 million or more in blockchain in the coming year. ^[1]
China is estimated to reap $440.4 billion or a boost of 1.7% on their GDP in 2030. ^[1]
In addition, experts predict that within a decade, 10% to 15% of the worldwide infrastructure will use blockchain technology. ^[1]
Meanwhile, the second spot goes to Europe with 1,258 ATMs (7.4%) and the third goes to Canada with 1,246 ATMs (7.3%). ^[1]
Private blockchain is the most popular model deployed in organizations worldwide, amounting to 50% of all implementations. ^[1]
This is followed by permissioned blockchain and private blockchain, which both garnered a 45% share of all global implementations. ^[1]
55% of senior executives said that blockchain technology is a critical priority for their organizations. ^[1]
This figure is up by 2% compared to 2019. ^[1]
27% of experts in the logistics business from the UK said that blockchain technology has “medium relevance” to their business, while 23% said it had “little relevance” to their business. ^[1]
This use case will bring an estimated $962 billion boost to global GDP by 2030. ^[1]
More than 80% think that blockchain will enable them to integrate touchless business processes, enhance business functionality, and comply with financial reporting requirements. ^[1]
In a survey, 87% of senior executives from around the world said that blockchain will allow them to enhance further integration towards touchless business processes. ^[1]
On the other hand, 86% think that blockchain will unlock new business functionality and revenue streams in their industry. ^[1]
Meanwhile, 83% of organizations said that they are “very or somewhat confident” in meeting financial reporting requirements related to blockchain. ^[1]
The world’s largest investment banks reported a 70% potential cost savings on central finance reporting due to blockchain technologies. ^[1]
Additionally, they reported a 30% to 50% potential cost savings on compliance, 50% potential cost savings on centralized operations, and 50% potential cost savings on business operations. ^[1]
Lastly, by using blockchain technologies, the world’s largest investment banks can save $12 billion or 38% in annual cost savings. ^[1]
According to senior executives worldwide, barriers to blockchain are implementation (30%), regulatory issues (30%), and potential security threats (29%). ^[1]
Other reasons cited were lack of in house capabilities (28%), uncertain ROI (28%), and concerns over sensitivity of competitive information (25%). ^[1]
58% of organizations say that cybersecurity is only one among many issues that they considering blockchain technologies of their digital asset strategy. ^[1]
Blockchain miners are using up 0.2% of the world’s total electricity, which makes energy consumption challenging for those who want to adopt blockchain technologies. ^[1]
China accounted for 46% of global blockchain patent applications, based on a survey of 100 global companies which filed patent applications. ^[1]
Other leading countries were the US (24%), Japan (8%), and South Korea (7%). ^[1]
In December of 2020, its trading price grew by a whopping 420% after Elon Musk tweeted “One word Doge” with a digital magazine cover featuring a Shiba Inu dog. ^[1]
$1,806,806,058,20324h Vol $91,903,431,610Dominance BTC 41.3% ETH. ^[2]
% 7d % Market Cap Volume. ^[2]
Moving to the commodity definition, according to the Cornell Law School, under the US Code, General Provisions, Chapter 1, § 1ª –Definition states that commodities are material goods as well as services, rights, and interests. ^[3]
[32] expose a fall of nearly 60% from the peak value of the cryptocurrency as an initial indication of the existence of this phenomenon. ^[3]
The dates were chosen according to the results of Zheng Zheng with the daily periodicity found in Investing. ^[3]
By analyzing the p values of the test, the null hypothesis is rejected, so the alternative, in which the sample does not come from the Gaussian distribution, is not rejected under a 99% confidence level. ^[3]
However, as stated in the literature [44], the CVaR is a better approximation for studying risk exposure because the expected losses surpass the VaR level. ^[3]
0.08913 VaR levels according to theoretical distribution in absolute values, elaborated by the authors CVaR 95%. ^[3]
CVaR levels according to theoretical distribution in absolute values, elaborated by the authors A graphical representation of these levels for the seven currencies is presented in Figs Figs11–7. ^[3]
The estimated number of terahashes per second the bitcoin network is performing in the last 24 hours. ^[10]
Services would exhibit the highest CAGR of 89.3% during 2019. ^[4]
Loyalty and Rewards Management would exhibit the highest CAGR of 97.0% during 2019. ^[4]
Small and medium enterprises would exhibit the highest CAGR of 87.4% during 2019. ^[4]
Blockchain in Retail Market AsiaPacific would exhibit the highest CAGR 92.0% during 2019. ^[4]
The LTC surged from $48.61 to $378.66 at a certain point, which is an increase of 678.98%. ^[11]
In other words, the IQR is the first quartile (25%) subtracted from the third quartile (75%). ^[11]
We calculate the return percentage, where t represents a certain period and price0 is the initial closing price. ^[11]
About 90% of U.S. and European banks had started exploring blockchain’s potential by 2018. ^[5]
74% of tech savvy executive teams say they believe there’s a huge business potential in blockchain technology. ^[5]
24% of companies expect to invest between $5 million and $10 million in blockchain during 2021. ^[5]
According to a survey of eight banks by Accenture Consulting, the potential savings on a cost base of $30 billion are more than $8 billion. ^[5]
That’s a compound annual growth rate of 37.4%. ^[5]
An even higher number (88%). ^[5]
Another 24% of the 1,000 surveyed companies reported that they plan to invest from $500,000 to less than $1 million, while 12% plan to spend $10 million or more. ^[5]
Life sciences industries take second place, with 23% of companies already using blockchain. ^[5]
More than 80% of cryptocurrency investors are novices; only 7.38% say they had previous experience in investing. ^[5]
According to one report, blockchain and crypto startups raised $3.9 billion through venture capital investments before the beginning of Q4 2018. ^[5]
Blockchain spending in the United States increased by 110% during 2018. ^[5]
The attack occurred in 2014 when Mt. Gox was handling about 70% of the world’s Bitcoin exchanges. ^[5]
Bitcoin miners generate annual emissions of carbon dioxide of between 22 and 22.9 megatons, according to a Technical University of Munich study published in the journal Joule. ^[5]
According to Bitcoin.com blockchain predictions, the last BTC will be mined in the year 2140. ^[5]
The Asia Pacific region has the largest percentage of Litecoin mining pools (52%). ^[5]
7% of BTC mining pools are located in the United States. ^[5]
When it comes to mining statistics for other cryptocurrencies, 21% of Ethereum, 37% of ZCash, 34% of Monero, and 28% of LTC mining pools are located in North America. ^[5]
Most Ethereum mining pools are located in Europe (49%). ^[5]
The country’s business environment is extremely favorable for crypto companies, featuring taxfree undistributed profits and 100% online cross. ^[5]
91.5% of all investments in cryptocurrencies are made by men. ^[5]
61% don’t consider themselves to be religious. ^[5]
Almost 30% have a yearly household income between $50,000 and $100,000 per year, 56% are either married or in a relationship, 43% have fulltime employment, and 37% consider themselves libertarian or anarchy. ^[5]
The computed values of the t test are compared with the critical one at the 5% significance level. ^[6]
2016 2017 Profit trades (% of total). ^[6]
it generates net profit with probability 60% and these results significantly differ from the random ones. ^[6]
Absolute drawdown 849.6 Maximal drawdown 6322.60 (22.68%). ^[6]
Total trades 245 Short positions (won %). ^[6]
Long positions (won %) 245 (60.00%). ^[6]
Profit trades (% of total) 147 (60.00%). ^[6]
Loss trades (% of total) 98 (40.00%). ^[6]
Mean,% 0.91% 0.47%. ^[6]
−0.13% 0.37% 0.05% 0.26% 0.21% Standard deviation,% 4.82% 4.05% 4.58% 5.05% 4.20% 3.60% 3.27% Number of observations 228 228 228 228 228 228 228 T. ^[6]
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Population 1 Mean,% 0.62% 0.75% 0.39% 0.56% −0.16% −0.16% 0.43% Standard deviation,% 9.79% 7.56% 9.24% 8.25% 6.87% 4.82% 4.63% Number of observations 188 188. ^[6]
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Population 1 Mean,% 0.26% 0.83% 0.41% 1.04% 0.86%. ^[6]
−0.19% −0.30% Standard deviation,% 7.80% 8.61% 6.35% 9.21% 7.04% 7.83% 5.19% Number of observations. ^[6]
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Population 1 Mean,% 1.00% 0.39% 1.12% 1.69% 1.40% 0.40% 0.66% Standard deviation,% 20.11% 11.01% 8.26% 8.70% 8.04% 9.10% 6.91% Number of observations 188. ^[6]
Parameter Monday All days except Monday and Sunday Mean,% 0.91% 0.20% Standard deviation,% 4.82% 4.32% Number of observations 228 1140 tcriterion 2.04 t critical 1.96 Null hypothesis. ^[6]
The cost of processing all the paperwork associated with a shipment can easily be around 15% of the shipment costs. ^[7]
Sectors were classified if at least 1% of the data was present; otherwise, these projects were placed in the category Other. ^[7]
The major blockchains classified include those that were identifiable in at least 1% of the data; otherwise, they were classified as Other. ^[7]
The peak of projects being created is in 2018, with 57% of all projects founded in 2017 and 2018 alone. ^[7]
4 Figure 2 shows the percentage of projects that use different blockchains based on their founding years. ^[7]
The major blockchains adopted are Ethereum, utilized by 23% of all projects and Hyperledger, utilized by 21% of all projects. ^[7]
13% of projects are blockchain agnostic. ^[7]
23% of projects do not disclose the blockchain that they use and are in the 5 6 7. ^[7]
On the other hand, the greatest proportion of Hyperledger projects was in 2018 with 38% of all projects utilizing Hyperledger. ^[7]
Projects in the Agnostic group accounted for the largest percentage of projects founded in 2014, but fluctuate under 20% over other years. ^[7]
Finally, projects in the TBC group are approximately 25–30% of all projects in each of 2016, 2017 and 2018. ^[7]
2017 and 2018 feature the greatest proportion of inactive projects, with 35% and 46% of all inactive projects (81%). ^[7]
Startups account for 64% of the entire dataset, followed by public companies at 17%, consortia at 15% and finally, government initiatives at 4%. ^[7]
Startups account for all projects in 2014 and 2015 and then decline over time, accounting for only 26% of all projects created in 2019. ^[7]
Of all startup projects, 35% of them were created in 2017 alone. ^[7]
Also of interest is that of those projects identified as being inactive, 35% of these are utilizing the Ethereum platform. ^[7]
The majority of projects are involved in the classification of product tracing/tracking, with nearly 66% of projects focused here. ^[7]
Second is the logistics classification, with 44% of projects using automation, IoT, and sensors in the supply chain to track products’ movements and status. ^[7]
Financial transactions are also significant, with 24% of projects identified with this use case. ^[7]
Finally, the two smallest application areas are circular economy with 8% and retail operations, with 7% of all projects. ^[7]
Ethereum dominates the startup category, with 32% of all startup projects utilizing this platform. ^[7]
For consortia and public companies, Hyperledger is the most popular used 35% and 34% respectively. ^[7]
For government initiatives, 50% of projects did not identify the blockchains they utilized. ^[7]
Out of all Ethereum projects, 90% were utilized by startups. ^[7]
Of all Hyperledger projects, consortia, public companies and startups utilized this blockchain at 24%, 28% and 45%. ^[7]
Overall, startups utilizing Ethereum accounted for 21% of the dataset as the largest single group. ^[7]
Within the dataset, the largest sectors that projects were applied to were the Agriculture/Grocery, Freight/Logistics, Multiple and Finance sectors with 40%, 17%, 13% and 9% of all projects respectively. ^[7]
Agriculture/Grocery projects account for the greatest share in each of the different organization types with 25%, 60%, 32% and 44% of consortia, government initiatives, public companies, and startups. ^[7]
Freight/Logistics is the second largest sector that projects operate in with 23%, 20%, 4% and 19% of projects in each of the consortia, government initiative, public company and startup categories. ^[7]
We look at these subsets as these two sectors, and blockchains account for 57% and 44% of all projects respectively. ^[7]
Here we see that the vast majority of Ethereum projects are led by startups (90%) compared with all of the projects in our entire dataset (64%). ^[7]
Concerning the status of a project, the proportion of inactive Ethereum projects (15%) is greater than the entire dataset (10%). ^[7]
Of all the Hyperledger projects, 83% are based on Hyperledger Fabric. ^[7]
9% utilized Hyperledger Sawtooth, and 2% utilized Hyperledger Besu and Grid each. ^[7]
It was not possible to determine which variant of Hyperledger 5% of projects utilized. ^[7]
Differently from Ethereum projects, we see that fewer Hyperledger projects are led by startups (45%). ^[7]
We also observe that Hyperledger projects are led by consortia and public companies 24% and 28%, respectively. ^[7]
This is higher than the dataset average, where we find that consortia and public companies lead 15% and 17% of all projects respectively. ^[7]
Hyperledger projects’ inactivity rate is also very low (1%) compared with the entire dataset (10%). ^[7]
Table 4 shows the percentage of projects using either Hyperledger or Ethereum in a particular year and within a particular sector compared to the averages for all sectors. ^[7]
With regards to startups and private companies, as shown in Figure 4, we see the percentage of private company projects changing from 100% in 2014 to 26% in 2019 and 33% for the first half of 2020. ^[7]
Public companies account for the majority at 40% of all projects in 2019. ^[7]
Of identifiable blockchains, Ethereum represents 23% of projects in the sample, and Hyperledger represents 21% of projects. ^[7]
We see that Ethereum projects account for 44%, 21% and 35% of projects created in 2015, 2016, 2017, and then Hyperledger dominating in 2018, 2019 and 2020 with 27%, 28% and 20% respectively as seen in Figure 2. ^[7]
As public companies become dominant in 2018 and 2019, we see that 34% of all public company projects utilize Hyperledger , whilst 32% of all startup projects utilize Ethereum. ^[7]
As shown in Figure 2, overall, 23% of all the projects are in the TBC category. ^[7]
73% of the projects in the TBC category have an in development status, more than for Ethereum or Hyperledger (65% and 62% of those projects). ^[7]
TBC projects account for the largest percentage of all projects with an in development status with 34%, which represents the largest grouping and suggests that these projects are still experimenting. ^[7]
Concerning inactivity, 2018 has the highest proportion of projects that are inactive, with 15% of all projects created in that year being inactive. ^[7]
67% of all projects are classified as in development, with 28% of all projects with this status created in the years between 2014 and 2017. ^[7]
For projects led by public companies, consortia, and government initiatives, a greater percentage than the dataset average (67%). ^[7]
Government projects have the most inactive projects, which stands at 20% of all government projects. ^[7]
With respect to sectors, Agriculture/Grocery dominates throughout all years and accounts for 40% of the dataset. ^[7]
Freight/Logistics is the second largest sector accounting for 17% of all projects. ^[7]
Agriculture is also the dominant sector amongst organization types leading projects and is largest for government led projects, with 60% of these projects taking place in the agriculture sector (above the 40% for all projects). ^[7]
Out of all consortia led projects, 23% are in the Freight/Logistics sector, greater than the dataset average (15%). ^[7]
We observe that 39% of all projects operate with more than one application area. ^[7]
The results show that Ethereum has a much greater proportion of startups (90% of all projects). ^[7]
This is very different from Hyperledger, which has a lower proportion of startups (45% of all projects). ^[7]
However, within our sample, funding data was only available for 28% of projects and therefore deemed not large enough to draw meaningful conclusions. ^[7]
China has accounted for nearly 60% of the total number of blockchain applications submitted by the USA, China, Japan, South Korea and Germany altogether through 2018, with its application total being nearly three times larger than the USA. ^[7]
Given this, the fact that only 8% of projects in our dataset were operating in China would indicate Chinese projects were most likely underrepresented. ^[7]
According to Juniper Research, the damages caused by cyber attacks in 2019 amounted to $2 trillion. ^[8]
It is estimated that by 2030, the global cybersecurity spending will be $2 billion in a bid to mitigate these malicious attacks. ^[8]
According to a study by the University of Sydney in Australia, bitcoin facilitated $76 billion of illegal business transactions around the world. ^[8]
Every 14 Seconds It is estimated that after every 14 seconds, an individual or company falls prey to a ransomware attack. ^[8]
This is according to the 2019 Official Annual Cybercrime Report that also indicated that most of these attacks go unreported. ^[8]
According to Gartner, by 2021, there will be an increase in the number of things connected to the internet, from 14 billion to 25 billion. ^[8]

I know you want to use Blockchain Analysis Software, thus we made this list of best Blockchain Analysis Software. We also wrote about how to learn Blockchain Analysis Software and how to install Blockchain Analysis Software. Recently we wrote how to uninstall Blockchain Analysis Software for newbie users. Don’t forgot to check latest Blockchain Analysis statistics of 2024.

Reference

plos – https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213919.
financesonline – https://financesonline.com/blockchain-statistics/.
coinmarketcap – https://coinmarketcap.com/.
nih – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6430404/.
alliedmarketresearch – https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/blockchain-in-retail-market.
fortunly – https://fortunly.com/statistics/blockchain-statistics/.
sciencedirect – https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612318304240.
frontiersin – https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbloc.2021.610476/full.
cm-alliance – https://www.cm-alliance.com/cybersecurity-blog/the-future-use-cases-of-blockchain-for-cybersecurity.
plos – https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0133678.
blockchain – https://www.blockchain.com/charts.
towardsdatascience – https://towardsdatascience.com/cryptocurrency-analysis-with-python-buy-and-hold-c3b0bc164ffa.

How Useful is Blockchain Analysis

One of the key advantages of blockchain analysis is its ability to track and trace transactions with an unparalleled level of accuracy and transparency. By analyzing the decentralized ledger, analysts can verify the authenticity of transactions, identify suspicious activities, and ensure that all parties involved adhere to the agreed-upon terms. This not only helps combat fraud and illicit activities but also promotes accountability and trust among users.

Furthermore, blockchain analysis can enhance security measures by detecting vulnerabilities and weaknesses in the system. By closely examining the individual blocks that comprise the blockchain and monitoring the network for any irregularities or inconsistencies, analysts can identify potential threats and take preventive measures to safeguard the integrity of the ledger. This proactive approach is essential in today’s digital landscape, where cyber threats are constantly evolving and posing significant risks to businesses and individuals alike.

Moreover, blockchain analysis can facilitate compliance with regulatory requirements and industry standards. As governments and regulatory bodies around the world continue to grapple with the challenges posed by digital currencies and blockchain technology, the ability to analyze and interpret blockchain data becomes increasingly important. By providing insights into the flow of funds, the identity of transacting parties, and the nature of transactions, blockchain analysis can assist in ensuring compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and know your customer (KYC) regulations, among others.

Additionally, blockchain analysis can empower businesses and organizations to make informed decisions based on accurate and reliable information. By leveraging the insights derived from blockchain data, companies can enhance operational efficiency, streamline processes, and optimize resource allocation. Whether it is tracking supply chain transactions, managing inventory, or improving customer relationships, the value of blockchain analysis extends far beyond just financial transactions.

In conclusion, blockchain analysis is a powerful tool with vast potential to revolutionize the way we conduct business, govern society, and interact online. By providing transparency, security, and trust in a decentralized environment, blockchain analysis can help combat fraud, enhance compliance, improve operational efficiency, and drive innovation across industries. As we continue to explore the possibilities of blockchain technology, it is crucial to recognize the critical role that blockchain analysis plays in unlocking its full potential. So let us embrace this transformative technology and harness its capabilities to usher in a new era of transparency, security, and trust in the digital age.

In Conclusion

Be it Blockchain Analysis benefits statistics, Blockchain Analysis usage statistics, Blockchain Analysis productivity statistics, Blockchain Analysis adoption statistics, Blockchain Analysis roi statistics, Blockchain Analysis market statistics, statistics on use of Blockchain Analysis, Blockchain Analysis analytics statistics, statistics of companies that use Blockchain Analysis, statistics small businesses using Blockchain Analysis, top Blockchain Analysis systems usa statistics, Blockchain Analysis software market statistics, statistics dissatisfied with Blockchain Analysis, statistics of businesses using Blockchain Analysis, Blockchain Analysis key statistics, Blockchain Analysis systems statistics, nonprofit Blockchain Analysis statistics, Blockchain Analysis failure statistics, top Blockchain Analysis statistics, best Blockchain Analysis statistics, Blockchain Analysis statistics small business, Blockchain Analysis statistics 2024, Blockchain Analysis statistics 2021, Blockchain Analysis statistics 2024 you will find all from this page. 🙂

We tried our best to provide all the Blockchain Analysis statistics on this page. Please comment below and share your opinion if we missed any Blockchain Analysis statistics.

Blockchain Analysis Statistics 2024 – Everything You Need to Know