Connected Agriculture Statistics 2024 - Everything You Need to Know

Are you looking to add Connected Agriculture to your arsenal of tools? Maybe for your business or personal use only, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to know more about the most important Connected Agriculture statistics of 2024.

My team and I scanned the entire web and collected all the most useful Connected Agriculture stats on this page. You don’t need to check any other resource on the web for any Connected Agriculture statistics. All are here only 🙂

How much of an impact will Connected Agriculture have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your business? Should you invest in Connected Agriculture? We will answer all your Connected Agriculture related questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any word. 🙂

On this page, you’ll learn about the following:

Best Connected Agriculture Statistics

Best Connected Agriculture Statistics

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 118 Connected Agriculture Statistics on this page 🙂

Connected Agriculture Market Statistics

A look at the distribution of precision farming worldwide shows North America as the major player with market value estimated at to 1.2 billion Euros in 2014. ^[0]
According to BLS, about half of all job openings between 2012 and 2024 are projected to be in occupations assigned to four clusters hospitality and tourism, business management and administration, marketing, and health science. ^[1]
Drones and autonomous machinery will deliver more impact to advanced markets, as technology will likely be more readily available there. ^[2]
Kenya, since 2016, nearly 1 million farmers –more than 60% women–are boosting their productivity and accessing markets. ^[3]

Connected Agriculture Latest Statistics

Americans’ expenditures on food amount to 12 percent of household budgets on average. ^[4]
Agriculture, food, and related industries contributed $1.055 trillion to the U.S. gross domestic product in 2020, a 5.0. ^[4]
The output of America’s farms contributed $134.7 billion of this sum—about 0.6 percent of GDP. ^[4]
The overall contribution of agriculture to GDP is larger than 0.6 percent because sectors related to agriculture rely on agricultural inputs in order to contribute added value to the economy. ^[4]
In 2020, 19.7 million fulland part time jobs were related to the agricultural and food sectors—10.3 percent of total U.S. employment. ^[4]
Direct on farm employment accounted for about 2.6 million of these jobs, or 1.4 percent of U.S. employment. ^[4]
With an 11.9 percent share, food ranked third—behind housing and transportation —among. ^[4]
In 2019, the U.S. food and beverage manufacturing sector employed 1.7 million people, or just over 1.1 percent of all U.S. nonfarm employment. ^[4]
Food and nutrition assistance accounted for more than 73 percent of USDA outlays in fiscal 2015. ^[4]
The share of agricultural retailers in the United States that offer yield monitor data analysis is expected to grow from 51 percent in 2015 to 58 percent in 2018. ^[0]
United States hog inventory down 2% NEWS RELEASE USDA NASS to livestream agricultural data briefings, enhances public access to valuable information Find Data and Reports by Find a Regional or State Field Office. ^[5]
There were about 1.8 million jobs in the SOC occupations that are assigned to the arts, audio/video technology, and communications cluster, according to BLS. ^[1]
If connectivity is implemented successfully in agriculture, the industry could tack on $500 billion in additional value to the global gross domestic product by 2030, according to our research. ^[2]
This would amount to a 7 to 9 percent improvement from its expected total and would alleviate much of the present pressure on farmers. ^[2]
By 2030, the water supply will fall 40 percent short of meeting global water needs, 3. ^[2]
By 2030, we expect advanced connectivity infrastructure of some type to cover roughly 80 percent of the world’s rural areas; the notable exception is Africa, where only a quarter of its area will be covered. ^[2]
By the end of the decade, enhanced connectivity in agriculture could add more than $500 billion to global gross domestic product, a critical productivity improvement of 7 to 9 percent for the industry. ^[2]
It’s also interesting to note that Asia should garner about 60 percent of the total value simply because it produces the biggest volume of crops. ^[2]
The extent to which this value will be captured, however, relies largely on advanced connectivity coverage, which is expected to be fairly low, around 25 percent, in Africa and poorer parts of Asia and Latin America. ^[2]
Thegrayandblackareasdenotethe68%and95%confidenceintervalsoftheexponentialmodelfitdeterminedfrombootstrapping. ^[6]
From these deviations, we estimate that ∼50% of the time the population of Wyoming and Colorado deviates from mean exponential growth by a factor of 1.25 or less and ∼90% of the time it deviates by a factor of 1.5 or less. ^[6]
that are substantially greater than the long term annual growth rate of 0.04%. ^[6]
They report continental growth rates of 0.03–0.05% for 2,000–12,000 cal BP . ^[6]
Based on the average survivorship of modern hunter gatherers , 4.11 births per woman are required to maintain an annual growth rate of 0.04%. ^[6]
We calculate that a change of 0.04 in the number of births per woman (a 1% increase, i.e., going from 4.11 to 4.15), doubles the annual growth rate from 0.04% to 0.08% (a 100% increase). ^[6]
A 1% increase in the probability that a woman lives to mean age of reproduction nearly doubles the annual rate of population growth. ^[6]
2), a 0.04% rate of growth retrodicts a global human population of a few individuals around 50,000 y ago. ^[6]
the exponential model we derive from the data along with 68% and 95% confidence intervals, which are shown in gray and black, respectively. ^[6]
The gray and black curves correspond to the 68% and 95% distribution of the simulated SPDs, respectively. ^[6]
The 68% and 95% confidence intervals indicate that large short term spikes in the SPD coincide with regions where there is high variance in the simulated SPDs. ^[6]
The authors quote an error of 100% for their population estimates for 2,000–12,000 cal BP. ^[6]
CSA’s accounted for $226 million of the $3 billion in directto consumer sales by farms. ^[7]
Irrigated agriculture represents 20 percent of the total cultivated land and contributes 40 percent of the total food produced worldwide. ^[8]
Combined with the increased consumption of calories and more complex foods, which accompanies income growth in the developing world, it is estimated that agricultural production will need to expand by approximately 70% by 2050. ^[8]
However, future demand on water by all sectors will require as much as 25 to 40% of water to be re allocated from lower to higher productivity and employment activities, particularly in water stressed regions. ^[8]
Currently, agriculture accounts for 70 percent of all freshwater withdrawals globally. ^[8]
As a result of the project, water conveyance efficiency increased by up to 68% in improved irrigation systems, and the program formalized about 190,000 new water rights. ^[8]
Yields per hectare were raised by up to 50% in on. ^[8]
Unfortunately, 22.3 percent of Americans in rural areas and 27.7 percent of Americans in Tribal lands lack coverage from fixed terrestrial 25/3. ^[9]
Mbps broadband, as compared to only 1.5 percent of Americans in urban areas, according to a recent report by the Federal Communications Commission. ^[9]
Agriculture and Food Agriculture can help reduce poverty, raise incomes and improve food security for 80% of the world’s poor, who live in rural areas and work mainly in farming. ^[3]
Analyses in 2016 found that 65% of poor working adults made a living through agriculture. ^[3]
Agriculture, forestry, and land use change are responsible for about 25% of greenhouse gas emissions. ^[3]
A 2021 report found that between 720 and 811 million people went hungry in 2020 , more than 10% of the world’s population. ^[3]
An estimated 3 billion people in the world cannot afford a healthy diet. ^[3]
Under the project, more than 110,000 heads of livestock–or about 17% of Armenia’s total livestock–received improved animal health services. ^[3]
Better water use efficiency on 44,000 hectares of farmland and new technologies have improved soil conditions and boosted production of rice by 12% and maize by 9%. ^[3]
Land productivity increased by 24% and gross sales of producer organizations rose by 23%. ^[3]
65% of surveyed households reported higher incomes. ^[3]
This allowed 4,000 cocoa producers to increase their incomes and increase production and export volumes by 50%. ^[3]
Nearly 11,000 families adopted improved agricultural technology and productivity increased by 78%. ^[3]
In Paraguay, since 2008, 20,863 farmers increased their agricultural income by at least 30% and 18,951 adopted improved agricultural practices, boosting the productivity of their land. ^[3]
The project has benefitted a total of 323,501 people–46% of them women–with farm roads, irrigation, and agricultural enterprise projects, boosting incomes by up to 36%. ^[3]
The Bank also provided planting materials to boost production for 33,817 farmers–10% of them female–working on 21,209 hectares of cocoa, and 35,505 hectares of coffee plantations. ^[3]
Horticulture productivity increased by 24%, while sales of horticulture products rose by 370% on average. ^[3]
The project reached more than 2.7 million beneficiaries, 41% of whom were women. ^[3]
There were 10.5 million farms in the EU in 2016, with the vast majority of them (95.2 %). ^[10]
Based on the FAO definition, the term ‘family farm’ is hereafter used to refer to any farm under family management where 50 % or more of the regular agricultural labour force was provided by family workers. ^[10]
A more detailed division can be made between those farms where labour was provided exclusively by the family and those where 50 % or more (but not 100 %). ^[10]
Most farms (93 %). ^[10]
Across all the farms in the EU 28, family farms used 81.4 % of the regular agricultural labour force. ^[10]
Family farms cultivated 108.0 million hectares of land in 2016, which represented a little less than two thirds (62.3 %). ^[10]
Family farms reared 62.5 % of all livestock and produced 59.5 % of the agricultural output in 2016. ^[10]
Non family farms represented less than 5% of the EU total number of farms in 2016 but cultivated just over one third of the total utilised agricultural area. ^[10]
Within this total, 176 000 were farms where family workers made up less than 50 % (but not 0 %). ^[10]
Together, these ‘non family farms’ accounted for 4.9 % of the total number of farms in. ^[10]
the EU 28 but cultivated 37.7 % of the utilised agricultural area. ^[10]
However, in these cases, the class with the largest size was always the one where family workers made up less than 50 % (but not 0 %). ^[10]
Family farms in Spain used 14.1 million hectares (13.1% of the EU total), the most in any Member State, those in France 12.4 million hectares (11.5 % of the EU total) and family farms in Poland 12.3 million hectares (also 11.5%). ^[10]
Family farms accounted for more than 90% of the total number of farms in 18 EU countries Figures 3 to 7 show the relative importance of family and non family farms in Member States. ^[10]
Family farms accounted for at least 90 % of all farms in 18 of the Member States , with shares higher than 80 % in all the remaining countries with the exceptions of Estonia (78.6 %) and France (68.3 %). ^[10]
The lowest shares were in Slovakia (16.3 %), Czechia (21.9 %) and Bulgaria (22.2 %), much less than the EU 28 average (62.3 %). ^[10]
The highest shares of over 90 % were in Ireland, Malta and Slovenia. ^[10]
This proportion was lowest in Czechia (27.4 %), Slovakia (28.3 %) and Estonia (42.9 %). ^[10]
The livestock reared and output generated was higher than 50 % in around two thirds of the Member States. ^[10]
Family farms reared more than 90 % of the livestock in Ireland, Austria and Slovenia, well above the EU average (62.5 %). ^[10]
In contrast, this share was below 20 % in Slovakia, Czechia and Estonia. ^[10]
Family farms also accounted for the vast majority of the value of agricultural output produced by the sector in many Member States (the EU average being 59.5 %) and particularly Ireland (92.8%), Slovenia (89.1%) and Greece (88.4%). ^[10]
This too was quite different to the family farms in Slovakia, Czechia and Estonia, that accounted for about or below 20 % of the monetary value of agricultural output produced by the sector. ^[10]
On farms with only family workers, the share of managers aged 65 or over (34.3 %) was much higher than in farms without any family labour (9.3 %). ^[10]
These figures suggest that farm managers working for corporations and cooperatives were much more likely to have stopped managing farms by the age of 65. ^[10]
However, the percentage of managers aged between 55 and 64 accounted for around one quarter of the total managers in all types of farm. ^[10]
Managers younger than 40 years old accounted for about 10 % of all managers on farms with only family workers, although this share rose to 17 % in non. ^[10]
Young farm managers of family farms were more common in Luxembourg (26.0 %); Austria (21.7 %) and Poland (20.0 %). ^[10]
They were far more scarce in Cyprus (2.9 % of all family farm managers) and Portugal (3.3 %), where family farm managers aged 65 or over were relatively common (43.7 % and 50.1 % respectively). ^[10]
Family farms may be defined as farms with exclusively family labour; farms that have predominately family labour (at least 50 % of the regular labour force). ^[10]
By contrast, nonfamily farms are defined as farms with predominantly non family labour (less than 50 % of the regular labour force). ^[10]
2024/23 sugarcane crop is forecast to recover to 613 million metric tons , an increase of six percent compared to the final estimate for MY 2021/22 (576 ). ^[11]
Canada 20.9 million acres. ^[12]
Canada7.6 million tonnes. ^[12]
Cattle inventories Canada11.1 million0.5%3.7 million acres6.4%14.0 million tonnes3.1%. ^[12]
$72.0 billion8.5%$54.2 billion1.9%. ^[12]
Farm sector equity Canada$571.5 billion5.3%$1.8 billion7.3%$2.0 billion9.3%. ^[12]
Hog inventories. ^[12]
$747.5 million4.3%$9.4 billion84.4%$278.0 million39.4%$620 million5.1%. ^[12]
Canada15.6 million tonnes. ^[12]
Farm sector equity Alberta$157.8 billion4.9%$1,453.6 million46.9%. ^[12]
$590.0 million. ^[12]
Farm sector equity Nova Scotia$2.5 billion6.2%. ^[12]
$10,373.4 million1.0%Farm sector equity. ^[12]
$4,143.9 million139.0%$3,025.3 million$633.0 million$7,026.5 million5.5%$5,322.9 million0.0%Farm sector equity. ^[12]
Farm sector equity. ^[12]
$1,046.4 million$204.5 million$869.2 million1.5%. ^[12]
$732.1 million11.5%Farm sector equity New Brunswick$2.7 billion4.6%$57.3 million55.6%$31.5 million$102.6 million$124.4 million. ^[12]
$131.8 million1.6%$0.4 billion16.9%. ^[12]
$2.6 billion3.6%$54.3 million0.6%. ^[12]
$3,922.4 million0.2%$3,399.5 million0.3%Farm sector equity British Columbia$41.5 billion8.7%$14.9 million. ^[12]
Farm sector equity. ^[12]
Agriculture, food, and related industries contributed over $1 trillion to the U.S. gross domestic product in 2017, a 5.4 percent share. ^[13]
and part time jobs are linked to the agricultural and food sectors 11 percent of total U.S. employment. ^[13]
Direct on farm employment accounted for about 2.6 million of these jobs, or 1.3 percent of the national total. ^[13]
For example, about 46% of our rivers and streams have excess nutrients, and only 28% are assessed as “healthy” based on their biological communities. ^[13]
For lakes, 21% have high levels of algal growth and 39% have measurable levels of a cyanotoxin a byproduct of certain kinds of bacteria. ^[13]
Around 21% of coastal waters have high nutrient levels. ^[13]

I know you want to use Connected Agriculture Software, thus we made this list of best Connected Agriculture Software. We also wrote about how to learn Connected Agriculture Software and how to install Connected Agriculture Software. Recently we wrote how to uninstall Connected Agriculture Software for newbie users. Don’t forgot to check latest Connected Agriculture statistics of 2024.

Reference

statista – https://www.statista.com/topics/4134/smart-agriculture/.
bls – https://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2015/article/career-clusters.htm.
mckinsey – https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/agriculture/our-insights/agricultures-connected-future-how-technology-can-yield-new-growth.
worldbank – https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agriculture/overview.
usda – https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ag-and-food-statistics-charting-the-essentials/ag-and-food-sectors-and-the-economy/.
usda – https://www.nass.usda.gov/.
pnas – https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1517650112.
usda – https://www.nal.usda.gov/legacy/afsic/community-supported-agriculture.
worldbank – https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/water-in-agriculture.
usda – https://www.usda.gov/broadband.
europa – https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Agriculture_statistics_-_family_farming_in_the_EU.
usda – https://www.fas.usda.gov/data.
statcan – https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/subjects-start/agriculture_and_food.
epa – https://www.epa.gov/nps/nonpoint-source-agriculture.

How Useful is Connected Agriculture

One of the key benefits of connected agriculture is the ability to collect and analyze vast amounts of data. By gathering information on factors such as soil quality, weather patterns, and crop growth, farmers can make more informed decisions and optimize their operations. This data-driven approach can help to minimize waste, reduce costs, and maximize yields, ultimately leading to greater profitability for farmers.

In addition to data collection, connected agriculture also enables remote monitoring and control of farming systems. For example, farmers can use drones to survey their fields, identify pest infestations, and even apply targeted treatments. This ability to take swift and precise action can help to prevent crop loss, enhance crop quality, and minimize the need for harmful chemicals.

Furthermore, connected agriculture can improve sustainability by promoting more efficient use of resources. By monitoring water usage, for example, farmers can ensure that irrigation is applied only when necessary, reducing waste and conserving this precious resource. Similarly, by implementing precision agriculture techniques, such as variable rate fertilization, farmers can optimize nutrient applications, reducing the environmental impact of agriculture.

Another advantage of connected agriculture is its potential to enhance food safety and traceability. By tracking each step of the supply chain, from farm to table, farmers can ensure that their products meet the highest standards of quality and safety. This level of transparency not only benefits consumers but also helps farmers to maintain and enhance their reputation in the marketplace.

Moreover, connected agriculture can foster collaboration and knowledge sharing among farmers. By connecting with experts, researchers, and other stakeholders through digital platforms, farmers can access valuable information and resources to help improve their practices. This exchange of information can lead to innovation, sustainable practices, and increased resilience in the face of challenges such as climate change and market fluctuations.

Despite its numerous benefits, connected agriculture is not without its challenges. One significant concern is the digital divide, as access to technology and internet connectivity can vary widely among farmers. In order to fully realize the potential of connected agriculture, it is essential to address these disparities and ensure that all farmers have the tools and resources they need to participate in the digital revolution.

In conclusion, connected agriculture has the potential to revolutionize the farming industry, promoting efficiency, sustainability, and collaboration. By harnessing the power of technology, farmers can optimize their operations, improve productivity, and meet the challenges of a rapidly changing world. As we look to the future of agriculture, embracing connected agriculture is essential to secure a more prosperous and sustainable future for food production.

In Conclusion

Be it Connected Agriculture benefits statistics, Connected Agriculture usage statistics, Connected Agriculture productivity statistics, Connected Agriculture adoption statistics, Connected Agriculture roi statistics, Connected Agriculture market statistics, statistics on use of Connected Agriculture, Connected Agriculture analytics statistics, statistics of companies that use Connected Agriculture, statistics small businesses using Connected Agriculture, top Connected Agriculture systems usa statistics, Connected Agriculture software market statistics, statistics dissatisfied with Connected Agriculture, statistics of businesses using Connected Agriculture, Connected Agriculture key statistics, Connected Agriculture systems statistics, nonprofit Connected Agriculture statistics, Connected Agriculture failure statistics, top Connected Agriculture statistics, best Connected Agriculture statistics, Connected Agriculture statistics small business, Connected Agriculture statistics 2024, Connected Agriculture statistics 2021, Connected Agriculture statistics 2024 you will find all from this page. 🙂

We tried our best to provide all the Connected Agriculture statistics on this page. Please comment below and share your opinion if we missed any Connected Agriculture statistics.

Connected Agriculture Statistics 2024 – Everything You Need to Know