Corporate Volunteering Platforms Statistics 2024 – Everything You Need to Know

• 45% of nonprofits don’t measure volunteer impact, and of that group, 34% attributed the failure to a lack of resources and tools . ^[5]
• Campaigns that are shared fewer than 2 times have a 97% chance of failure. ^[1]

Corporate Volunteering Platforms Adoption Statistics

• 58% of nonprofit social media happens on mobile 95% mobile phone adoption rate for US adults 81% smartphone adoption rate for US adults 51% of US donors do not have a landline. ^[1]

Corporate Volunteering Platforms Latest Statistics

• volunteer statistics Only55%of nonprofits assess volunteer impact. ^[6]
• Individuals between the ages of 35 and 54 are themost likely to volunteertheir time according to The Bureau of Labor Statistics. ^[6]
• Volunteers are worth on average $28.54 an hour according to anIndependent Sector Study. ^[6]
• Those who volunteer regularly have a 27% better chance of gaining employment. ^[6]
• 60% of hiring managers see the act of volunteerism as a valuable asset when making recruitment decisions according to astudy performed by Career Builder. ^[6]
• According to a report fromBlackbaud#GivingTuesday, 2017processed more than $60.9 millionfrom over 7,200 organizations. ^[6]
• Volunteers under the age of 24 accounts for 22.6% of all volunteers. ^[6]
• 4% ofcollege graduates, 25 years or older, volunteer each year. ^[6]
• Over 71% of volunteers work with only one organization each year. ^[6]
• 67% of people found volunteer opportunities online in 2014 vs 34% in 2006. ^[6]
• that 61% of millennials who rarely or never volunteer still consider a company’s commitment to the community when making a decision on a potential job. ^[6]
• 92% of human resource executivesagree that contributing to a nonprofit can improve an employees leadership skills. ^[6]
• In 2014,39% of 12th grade studentsreported that they volunteered at least once per month according to findings from Child Trends. ^[6]
• Women currently volunteermore than men(by about 6% more). ^[6]
• Volunteers are 66% more likely to donate financially to the organization they support than those who do not volunteer their time. ^[6]
• Food preparation and distribution was themost reportedvolunteer activity representing 11.3% in 2015. ^[6]
• 77% of nonprofits believe that skilled volunteers could improve their organizations business practices. ^[6]
• 35% of volunteers do so to socialize with others in the community. ^[6]
• 66% of volunteers give their time to improve their community, and 83% do so to contribute to a cause they care about. ^[6]
• According to an AmeriCorpsreport, people who volunteer over 100 hours a year are some of the healthiest people in the U.S. ^[6]
• 30.7%of Baby Boomers volunteer each year. ^[6]
• 24.8%of Silent Generation Americans volunteer each year. ^[6]
• Utah has thehighest rateof volunteers in America (51%). ^[6]
• According to LinkedIn, response to the COVID 19 pandemic added more that110,000 volunteer activitiesper month, double the rate of 2017. ^[6]
• Volunteering decreases the likelihood of high blood pressure development by40%. ^[6]
• 70% of corporate volunteersbelieve volunteerism boosts morale more that company mixers. ^[6]
• 96% of volunteers reported the action enriched their sense of purpose in life. ^[6]
• An estimated $4 – $7 billion in matching gift funds goes unclaimed per year. ^[7]
• Double the Donation’s Analysis of Matching Gift Participation Rates 65% of Fortune 500 companies offer matching gift programs. ^[7]
• An estimated $2 – $3 billion is donated through matching gift programs annually. ^[7]
• Double the Donation’s projections based on company reported match figures and analysis of surveys Potential Impact of Matching Gifts 84% of survey participants say they’re more likely to donate if a match is offered. ^[7]
• The Big Give Research Initiative 11% of total corporate cash contributions to nonprofits are made through matching gift programs. ^[7]
• The Big Give Research Initiative Only 1.31% of individual contributions are matched at the average nonprofit organization. ^[7]
• 86% of donors want to be able to give their original donation directly to a nonprofit through the nonprofit’s website. ^[7]
• 6% of donors want to give their original donation through a workplace giving platform and then have that gift passed along to the nonprofit. ^[7]
• 8% of donors didn’t indicate a preferred donation channel. ^[7]
• Mentioning matching gifts in fundraising appeals results in a 71% increase in response rate and a 51% increase in average donation amount. ^[7]
• Sending matching gift reminder emails within 24 hours of a donation results in a 53% open rate, which is 2 3 times higher than the average nonprofit email open rate. ^[7]
• For example, among donors who have already been identified as match eligible, the second matching gift email sent increases the number of matches identified and submitted by the first email by 48%. ^[7]
• That means sending the second reminder email increases matches submitted by 48%!. ^[7]
• Employing multiple approaches to identifying matcheligible donors results in 77% more identified match. ^[7]
• Double the Donation Database Analysis and Projections, 2021 Email domain screening for match eligible donations can result in a 1% increase in total revenue for nonprofits. ^[7]
• Double the Donation’s Analysis of Matching Gift Programs 4% match at a lower rate such as .51 5% match at a higher rate such as 21 or 31 Source. ^[7]
• 85% of the top matching gift companies also offer volunteer grant programs. ^[7]
• This represents an 11% increase over previous year match levels. ^[7]
• Caps that are set at $1,000 see a 12% employee engagement rate. ^[7]
• Caps that are from $1,001 to $10,000 see an 18% engagement rate. ^[7]
• Any cap beyond $10,000 sees a spike in employee engagement up to 40%. ^[7]
• Corporations gave over $21 billion to nonprofits in 2019, an increase of 13.4% over the previous year. ^[7]
• 58% of companies surveyed said workplace giving programs are somewhat or very important in retaining talent Source. ^[7]
• Only 1% of companies surveyed plan to reduce their programs. ^[7]
• Double the Donation’s Analysis of Matching Gift Programs 66% of companies surveyed provided paid release time volunteer programs in 2019. ^[7]
• The average corporate volunteer rate participation rate is 33%. ^[7]
• The participation rate at top quartile corporate volunteer programs is 66%. ^[7]
• Matching Gift Companies Many companies offer a matching gift program (65% of Fortune 500 companies do!). ^[7]
• 71% of surveyed employees say it is imperative or very important to work where culture is supportive of giving and volunteering. ^[0]
• America’s Charities Snapshot Employee Donor Research More than 49% of nonprofit respondents identified workplace giving as a growth strategy for their organization. ^[0]
• America’s Charities Snapshot Nonprofit Research As consumers increasingly choose brands based on CSR values, 69% of respondents report that their organizations have generated increased sales as a result of CSR initiatives. ^[0]
• 30% of employee donors say the reason why they do not give through the workplace is that the causes they care about are not available as choices through their employer’s giving program. ^[0]
• Employee Wellness, Retention, and Recruitment 88% of company leaders believe effective employee engagement programs help attract and retain employees. ^[0]
• America’s Charities Snapshot Employer Research 77% of employers believe that offering employee engagement opportunities is an important recruitment strategy to attract millennials. ^[0]
• America’s Charities Snapshot Employer Research 70% of employee donors say it is imperative or very important to work for an employer where mission and value align. ^[0]
• America’s Charities Snapshot Employee Donor Research 53% of respondents in the 2014 Millennial Impact Study said having their passions and talents recognized and addressed is their top reason for remaining at their current company. ^[0]
• Employees most committed to their organizations put in 57% more effort on the job and are 87% less likely to resign than employees who consider themselves disengaged. ^[0]
• According to a Project ROI study , a well designed corporate social responsibility program can increase employee engagement by up to 7.5%, increase employee productivity by 13%, reduce employee turnover by 50%, and increase revenue by as much as 20%. ^[0]
• 55% of employees would choose to work for a socially responsible company, even if it meant a lower salary. ^[0]
• The impact of financial stress on workers costs employers 13 18% of annual salary costs. ^[0]
• Salary Finance 2020 report 64% of adults say that money is a significant source of stress in their life. ^[0]
• American Psychological Association Just 39% of Americans say they have enough savings to cover a $1,000 emergency room visit or car repair. ^[0]
• Bankrate 39% of Americans can’t cover a $400 unexpected emergency expense or would need to borrow or sell something to do so. ^[0]
• The majority of companies (66%). ^[0]
• Average employee participation in employer matching gift programs is 10%, demonstrating a marked opportunity for growth. ^[0]
• Nearly 60% of companies offer paid time off for employees to volunteer, and an additional 21% plan to offer release time in the next two years. ^[0]
• America’s Charities Snapshot Employer Research 82% of businesses say their employees want the opportunity to volunteer with peers in a corporate. ^[0]
• America’s Charities Snapshot Employer Research 75% of U.S. adults feel physically healthier by volunteering. ^[0]
• Doing Good is Good for You Study 92% of surveyed corporate human resources executives. ^[0]
• In an analysis of over 30,000 individual volunteer activities, skills based volunteerism outperformed traditional volunteerism by 125% in all but one tracked benefit categories. ^[0]
• 70% of employers firmly believe that their employees expect them to be a socially responsible company. ^[0]
• America’s Charities Snapshot Employer Research 70% of employees say it is imperative or very important to work for an employer where mission and value align. ^[0]
• America’s Charities Snapshot Employee Donor Research 92% of companies believe that their customers expect them to be good corporate citizens. ^[0]
• As social purpose’s role in purchasing decisions has increased, purchase frequency has also intensified 47% of global consumers buy brands that support a good cause at least monthly, a 47% increase from 2010. ^[0]
• 72% of consumers would recommend a brand that supports a good cause over one that doesn’t; a 39% increase since 2008. ^[0]
• 71% of consumers would help a brand promote their products or services if there is a good cause behind them; a growth of 34% since 2008. ^[0]
• The estimated value of each volunteer hour conducted in the United States is $28.54. ^[5]
• An estimated 25.1 percent of US adults volunteered in 2017, contributing about 8.8 billion hours . ^[5]
• In 2017, the average number of hours contributed per volunteer was 137 ( Statista 74% of nonprofits report that constituents’ desire to participate in their organization’s work has increased over the last five years ( Salesforce.org). ^[5]
• 72% of volunteers serve only one or two organizations or causes Bureau Of Labour Statistics Women volunteer 6% more than men . ^[5]
• 35% of volunteers said one of the reasons they volunteer is to socialize. ^[5]
• ( Sterling Volunteers Utah is the U.S. state with the highest percentage of volunteers (51%). ^[5]
• The top four national volunteer activities in the U.S. are fundraising or selling items to raise money (36%), preparing or distributing food (34%), collecting and distributing goods or clothing (26.5%), and mentoring youths (26%). ^[5]
• ( Deloitte Impact Survey Almost 60% of companies provide paid time off (PTO) for employees to volunteer ( America’s Charities. ^[5]
• The average corporate volunteer rate participation rate is 33% . ^[5]
• 40% of Fortune 500 companies offer volunteer grant programs. ^[5]
• Americans gave $410 billion to charities in 2017, up 5%. ^[1]
• 31% of donors worldwide give to NGOs, NPOs & charities located outside of their country of residence. ^[1]
• 41% give in response to natural disasters. ^[1]
• Education giving saw relatively slower growth compared to the strong growth rates experienced in most post. ^[1]
• In each of the years 2014 and 2015 education giving grew by more than 8 percent. ^[1]
• Total charitable giving grew 4.1% in 2016 and 5% in 2017. ^[1]
• Foundation giving in 2016 increased to $58.28 billion – a 3.5% increase from 2015. ^[1]
• Giving to Education charities was up 6.2% to $58.9 billion (14% of all donations). ^[1]
• Donations to Human Services charities were up 5.1% to $50.06 billion (12% of all donations). ^[1]
• Foundations saw an increase of % to $45.89 billion (11% of all donations). ^[1]
• Health charities experienced an increase of 15.5% to $38.27 billion (9% of all donations). ^[1]
• Public Society Benefit charities saw an increase of 7.8% to $29.59 billion (7% of all donations). ^[1]
• Giving to International charities decreased by 4.4% to $22.97 billion (6% of all donations). ^[1]
• Arts, Culture and Humanities saw an increase of 8.7% to $19.51 billion (5% of all donations). ^[1]
• Charities that focus on the Environment / Animals saw an increase of 7.2% to $11.83 billion (3% of all donations). ^[1]
• With the 2.9% increase in donations this year, 31% of all donations, or $127.37 billion, went to Religious organizations. ^[1]
• In 2017, the largest source of charitable giving came from individuals at $281.86 billion, or 72% of total giving; followed by foundations ($58.28 billion/15%), bequests ($30.36 billion/8%), and corporations ($18.55 billion/5%). ^[1]
• In 2016, the majority of charitable dollars went to religion (32%), education (16%), human services (12%), grantmaking foundations (11%), and health (9%). ^[1]
• Environmental and animal organizations experienced the largest giving increase in 2016, receiving 7.2% more than the previous year. ^[1]
• Charitable giving accounted for 2.1% of gross domestic product in 2016. ^[1]
• Approximately 91% of high net worth households give to charity. ^[1]
• 56% of the country’s public schools have at least one donor appeal on its site. ^[1]
• Traditional product fundraising accounts for roughly 80% of the dollars that school groups use to provide “extras” for their schools. ^[1]
• 67% of principals turn fundraising decisions over to their PTO or PTA, even though experts believe this hands off approach actually hampers a fundraiser’ssuccess. ^[1]
• 71% of parents said they’ve sold fundraising products to friends, family, and co. ^[1]
• 35% of schools average $0 – $5,000 in annual earnings from fundraising while 27.1% earn more than $75,000. ^[1]
• Charitable contributions to colleges and universities in the United States increased only 1.7% in2016. ^[1]
• The Top 20 fundraising institutions together raised $11.12 billion, 27.1 percent of the 2016 total. ^[1]
• Approximately 63 million Americans — 25% of the adult population — volunteer their time, talents, and energy to making a difference. ^[1]
• The volunteer rate declined by 0.4% to 24.9% in 2016. ^[1]
• Women volunteer at higher rates (27.8%) than men (21.8%). ^[1]
• People aged 3544 and 45 54 are most likely to volunteer (28.9% and 28% respectively). ^[1]
• while 20 24 year olds have the lowest rates (18.4%). ^[1]
• 72% of volunteers are involved with only one organization, while 18.3% are involved with two. ^[1]
• The top four national volunteer activities are food collection or distribution (24.2%), fundraising or selling items to raise money (23.9%), general labor or transportation (18.8%), and tutoring or teaching (17.9%). ^[1]
• The top four volunteer areas are for religious (34.1%), educational (26%), social service (14.9%), and health (7.3%). ^[1]
• 42.1% of people became volunteers with their main organization after being asked to volunteer. ^[1]
• 49% of all church giving transactions are made with a card. ^[1]
• 60% are willing to give to their church digitally. ^[1]
• Tithers make up only 10 25 percent of a normal congregation. ^[1]
• Churches that accept tithing online increase overall donations by 32%. ^[1]
• Only 5% tithe, and 80% of Americans only give 2% of their income. ^[1]
• Christians are giving at 2.5% of income; during the Great Depression it was 3.3%. ^[1]
• Only 3 5% of Americans who give to their local church do so through regular tithing. ^[1]
• When surveyed, 17% of Americans state that they regularly tithe. ^[1]
• For families making $75k+, 1% of them gave at least 10% in tithing. ^[1]
• 37% of regular church attendees and Evangelicals don’t give money to church. ^[1]
• 17% of American families have reduced the amount that they give to their local church. ^[1]
• 7% of church goers have dropped regular giving by 20% or more. ^[1]
• 77% of those who tithe give 11%–20% or more of their income, far more than the baseline of 10%. ^[1]
• 30% of annual giving occurs in December. ^[1]
• 10% of annual giving occurs on the last 3 days of the year. ^[1]
• 77% believe everyone can make a difference by supporting causes. ^[1]
• 64% of donations are made by women. ^[1]
• 40% of Millennial donors are enrolled in a monthly giving program. ^[1]
• 16% give through Facebook fundraising tools. ^[1]
• 11% of total US giving comes from Millennials. ^[1]
• 84% of Millennials give to charity, donating an annual average of $481 across 3.3 organizations. ^[1]
• 47% of Millennials gave through an organization’s website in 2016. ^[1]
• 49% of Gen X donors are enrolled in a monthly giving program. ^[1]
• 19% give through Facebook fundraising tools. ^[1]
• Email prompted 31% of online donations made by Gen Xers 59% of Gen Zs are inspired to donate to charity by a message/image they saw on social media. ^[1]
• represent 23.6% of the US populations. ^[1]
• 49% of Baby Boomer donors are enrolled in a monthly giving program. ^[1]
• 21% give through Facebook fundraising tools. ^[1]
• 24% of Boomers say they were promoted to give an online donation because of direct mail they received. ^[1]
• 72% of Boomers give to charity, donating an annual average of $1,212 across 4.5 organizations. ^[1]
• is 11.8% of the US population. ^[1]
• 30% of donors aged 75+ say they have given online in the last 12 months and on average give 25% more frequently than younger generations. ^[1]
• 88% of the Greatest gen gives to charity, donating an annual average of $1,367 across 6.2 organizations. ^[1]
• They represent 26% of total US giving Greatest prefer voice calls and direct mail. ^[1]
• Corporate giving in 2017 increased to $20.77 billion—an 8.0% increase from 2016. ^[1]
• 79% of companies reported increased donor participation rates and 73% raised more money. ^[1]
• More than 49% of nonprofit respondents identified workplace giving as a growth strategy for their organization. ^[1]
• 90% indicated that partnering with reputable nonprofit organizations enhances their brand and 89% believe partnering leverages their ability to improve the community. ^[1]
• 80% of nonprofits in Snapshot 2014 said they have difficulty building strong corporate partnerships and workplace giving strategies with limited staff and resources. ^[1]
• 73% of companies prefer to have deeper partnerships with a smaller number. ^[1]
• An estimated $2 3 billion is donated through matching gift programs annually. ^[1]
• Corporate matches of employee donations were 12% of total corporate cash contributions. ^[1]
• An estimated $6 $10 billion in matching gift funds goes unclaimed per year. ^[1]
• Nearly 60% of companies offer paid time off for employees to volunteer, and an additional 21% plan to offer release time in the next two years. ^[1]
• An average of 30% of employees volunteer. ^[1]
• 50% of employees volunteering is the minimum to be in the top quartile. ^[1]
• In an analysis of over 30,000 individual volunteer activities, skillsbased volunteerism outperformed traditional volunteerism by 7 125% in all but one tracked benefit categories. ^[1]
• 92% of surveyed corporate human resources executives agree that contributing business skills and expertise to a nonprofit can be an effective way to improve employees’ leadership and broader professional skill sets. ^[1]
• 86% believe that employees expect them to provide opportunities to engage in the community and 87% believe their employees expect them to support causes and issues that matter to those employees. ^[1]
• 82% of the survey respondents say employees want the opportunity to volunteer with peers in a corporate. ^[1]
• 88% believe effective employee engagement programs help attract and retain employees. ^[1]
• 77% of the respondents believe that offering employee engagement opportunities is an important recruitment strategy to attract millennials. ^[1]
• The median employee participation rate for matching gift programs is 9%. ^[1]
• Mentioning matching gifts in fundraising appeals results in a 71% increase in the response rate and a 51% increase in the average donation amount. ^[1]
• 84% of survey participants revealed they’re more likely to donate if a match was offered. ^[1]
• 12.3% of total corporate cash contributions went through corporate matching gift programs. ^[1]
• Technology companies gave the highest proportion of matching gift contributions as a percentage of total cash gifts at 17.3%. ^[1]
• 29% of corporate giving went to educationrelated causes — a combined percentage from K 12 and higher education. ^[1]
• 25% of corporate giving went to health and social services programs. ^[1]
• 15% of corporate giving went to the community and economic development programs. ^[1]
• 85% of companies in the US have a formal domestic corporate giving program in place vs. only 45% with a formal international program. ^[1]
• 78% of Americans wanting companies to address social justice issues. ^[1]
• 88% of Millennials find their job more fulfilling when they have opportunities to make a positive impact on society and the environment. ^[1]
• Purpose driven consumer companies achieved a compounded annual growth rate of 9.85% over five years, compared to just 2.4% for the whole S&P 500 Consumer Sector. ^[1]
• Employees who engaged in corporate giving programs tended to have 75% longer tenures with the company. ^[1]
• Overall revenue from online fundraising grew by 23% in 2017. ^[1]
• Online giving grew 12.1% in 2017. ^[1]
• 54% of donors worldwide prefer to give online with a credit or debit card.11% prefer direct mail.11% prefer cash.10% prefer bank/wire transfer.9% prefer Paypal.4% prefer mobile app/wallet.1% prefer text message. ^[1]
• 67% of nonprofits across the globe are set up to accept online donations. ^[1]
• On December 31%, online giving is concentrated between 12PM – 7PM. ^[1]
• Overall online revenue increased by 23% in 2017, accelerating from 15% growth the previous year. ^[1]
• Every sector tracked saw at least 15% online revenue growth, with particularly large gains for Environmental (34%) and Rights (37%). ^[1]
• Nonprofits received an average of 28% more online gifts in 2017 than 2016. ^[1]
• On average, 38% of donors who made an online gift to a nonprofit in 2016 made an online gift again to that nonprofit in 2017. ^[1]
• Retention was 25% for donors who made their first gift in 2016, and 60% for repeat donors. ^[1]
• Revenue from one time gifts increased by 19% in 2017. ^[1]
• In one case study, a nonprofit used Custom Facebook Audiences to drive 63% more online donations. ^[1]
• Revenue from monthly giving grew 23% compared to 13% growth for one. ^[1]
• Pre selecting monthly giving on your donation page can increase conversions of monthly donations by up to 35%. ^[1]
• Email messaging accounted for 26% of all online revenue. ^[1]
• Chat Support increase audience engagement rates to drive 45% more opt. ^[1]
• Only 3% of charities rate their board and executiveleadership as being digitally savvy. ^[1]
• 66% of charities are worried they will miss out on opportunities for digital fundraising. ^[1]
• Direct mail motivated 36% more donors to give online in 2016 compared to previous year. ^[1]
• 51% of high wealth donors prefer to give online. ^[1]
• 34% of nonprofits have paid for advertising on social media. ^[1]
• 21% of donations are directly through social. ^[1]
• Giving Tuesday raised $380 million dollars online, up 38% or $106 million from 2017. ^[1]
• Facebook raised more than $125 million for charity on Giving Tuesday, up 178% or $80 million from 2017.Facebook and PayPal matched $7 million in donations to United States nonprofits Giving Tuesday. ^[1]
• The largest Giving Tuesday payment processing platformsPayPal $98 million, up from $64 million (+53%). ^[1]
• $62.6 million, up from $60.90 million (+2.80%). ^[1]
• 46% of donors worldwide have not heard of #GivingTuesday. ^[1]
• 17% of online donation form views were on a mobile device. ^[1]
• Overall, 1.1% of website visitors made a donation, an increase of 18% over 2016. ^[1]
• Website traffic declined slightly in 2017, with 1.4% fewer visitors per month. ^[1]
• Mobile accounted for 40% of all visitors, tablets for 10%, and desktop users made up the other 50%. ^[1]
• The share of mobile traffic increased by 9% from 2016, while the share of visitors using desktop or laptop computer declined by 4%. ^[1]
• 45% of donors enrolled in a monthly giving program. ^[1]
• Monthly giving revenue increased by 40% in 2017. ^[1]
• Monthly giving accounted for 14% of all online revenue in 2016, and 16% of online revenue in 2017. ^[1]
• Donors that set up recurring donations give 42% more annually, compared to one. ^[1]
• 52% of Millennials are more likely to give monthly over a large one. ^[1]
• 41% have donated to crowdfunding campaigns that benefit individuals. ^[1]
• 16% of crowdfunders donate less money to NGS, NPOs, & charities due to their financial support of crowdfunding campaigns. ^[1]
• 14% of donors worldwide have created an online peerto. ^[1]
• 17% of crowdfunding donations are made on mobile devices. ^[1]
• Campaigns that can gain 30% of their goal within the first week are more likely to succeed. ^[1]
• Social Media is a critical factor in crowdfunding success for every order of magnitude increase in Facebook friends , the probability of success increases drastically (from 9% , 20%, to 40%). ^[1]
• Individuals ages 24 35 are much more likely to participate in crowdfunding campaigns; those over 45 are significantly less likely to back campaigns. ^[1]
• There’s an average of a 35% increase in giving when there’s a crowdfunding thermometer. ^[1]
• 62% of donors who give to crowdfunding campaigns are new to crowdfunding. ^[1]
• Crowdfunding campaigns get 126% more donations when owners update supporters. ^[1]
• Crowdfunding campaigns with personal videos raise 150% than those that don’t have videos. ^[1]
• 55% of people who engage with nonprofits on social media end up taking some sort of action. ^[1]
• The most viewed brand videos are on average 31–60 seconds long (32% of all views). ^[1]
• In 2015, 1849 year olds spent 4% less time watching TV while time on YouTube went up 74%. ^[1]
• 28% of nonprofits are on Youtube. ^[1]
• 57% of people who watch nonprofit videos go on to make a donation. ^[1]
• 68% of nonprofit video watchers view similar videos within 30 days. ^[1]
• 36% of online adults ages 18 29 are on the social network. ^[1]
• 80% of active users access Twitter via mobile. ^[1]
• 60% of consumers expect brands to respond to their query within the hour, but the average is 1 hour 24 minutes. ^[1]
• 55% of people who engage with nonprofits on Twitter end up taking some sort of action. ^[1]
• Twitter users send 700% more visitors to donation pages on Giving Tuesday than on a typical day. ^[1]
• 77% of Twitter users feel more positive about a brand when their Tweet has been replied to. ^[1]
• Companies using Twitter for customer service see a 19% lift in customer satisfaction. ^[1]
• Tweets with images receive 18% more click throughs, 89% more likes, and 150% more retweets. ^[1]
• About 1 in 5 churches use Twitter (21%). ^[1]
• 44% of churches that have an average attendance of more than 250 use Twitter. ^[1]
• 9% of those actively involved in church use Twitter. ^[1]
• 59% of those people donate money. ^[1]
• 52% donate clothing, food, or other personal items. ^[1]
• 43% attend or participate in charitable events in their community because of social media. ^[1]
• 25% contact their political representatives either by phone, letter, or email after engaging with a cause on social media. ^[1]
• 15% organize their own events in their community afterward. ^[1]
• 46.1% of churches say that using social media is their most effective method of outreach. ^[1]
• 30% of nonprofits use Instagram to raise money and awareness. ^[1]
• 75% of Instagram users take action, such as visiting a website or making a purchase after looking at an Instagram advertising post. ^[1]
• 26% of Instagram users make more than $75,000 per year. ^[1]
• 67% of Pinterest users are under the age of 40. ^[1]
• 93% of Pinners shopped online in the past 6 months. ^[1]
• Pins with prices get 36% more likes than those without. ^[1]
• 87% of Pinners have purchased a product because of Pinterest. ^[1]
• About 70% of Pinners are saving or clicking on Pins not just visiting. ^[1]
• 18% of donors worldwide have given through Facebook fundraising tools. ^[1]
• Of those, 88% say they are likely to give through Facebook fundraising tools in the future. ^[1]
• Facebook refers 29.4% of traffic to donation pages on #GivingTuesday. ^[1]
• More than 29% of mobile donation traffic on Giving Tuesday came from Facebook. ^[1]
• In an average peertopeer fundraising campaign, 15 18% of donations are referred directly from Facebook. ^[1]
• 84% of FaceBook users share to show their support for a cause and highlight issues that are important to them. ^[1]
• On Thursdays and Fridays, engagement is 18% higher. ^[1]
• By 2018, mobile devices will account for 57% of all Internet traffic. ^[1]
• In the last year, the percentage of smartphone owners making mobile payments grew by 36%. ^[1]
• 39% of smartphone owners indicated that they had used their phones to pay at least one bill in the past month, which equates to 53 million adult individuals. ^[1]
• 25% of donors complete their donations on mobile devices. ^[1]
• 44% of millennials said that would rather use their mobile phones than use cash to pay for small items. ^[1]
• In the past year, mobile giving donations have increased 205%. ^[1]
• 51% of people who visit a nonprofit’s website do so on a mobile device. ^[1]
• Overall giving increased 4% last year. ^[1]
• Faith based organizations saw the greatest increase in giving with an 18.1% increase in online donations. ^[1]
• 64% of mobile donations come from women. ^[1]
• Nearly three fourths of the entire population of the United States donates to charity in some form or another on a regular basis (69%). ^[1]
• By incorporating mobile responsive design to their websites, nonprofits can increase their donations by 126% on average. ^[1]
• An express checkout option on a website can increase mobile sales and donations by up to 55%. ^[1]
• 30% of all annual giving occurs in December, and 10% of that happens within the last three days of the year. ^[1]
• 84% of event fundraising pledges are fulfilled. ^[1]
• 51% of mobile pledges came from call centers. ^[1]
• 117% is the average mobile subscription rate. ^[1]
• 54 % of nonprofit emails are read on mobile. ^[1]
• 11% of Americans change their address each year. ^[1]
• 90% of text message reminders are read in 3 minutes. ^[1]
• More than 50% of the Textto Haiti donors made their donations shortly after learning about the campaign. ^[1]
• Text donors are most likely to be between 49 and 59 years old, female, married, and college graduates. ^[1]
• 91% of American adults own a smartphone. ^[1]
• 41% of people still have a landline. ^[1]
• Email messaging drove 28% of all online revenue in 2017. ^[1]
• 68% of donors worldwide most trust websites & email addresses that use the .org domain extension. ^[1]
• The Public Media sector received the lowest share of revenue from email (10%). ^[1]
• In 2015, lists grew by 15%; in 2016, by 14%; in 2017, by 11%. ^[1]
• Public Media nonprofits saw 41% growth in list size in 2017, while International was the only sector to experience a decline . ^[1]
• Nonprofits sent an average of 66 email messages per subscriber in 2017, marking an 11% increase in volume from 2016. ^[1]
• Advocacy email response rate declined by 9% in 2017, to 2.2%. ^[1]
• Small drops were reported for open rate (down 1% to 15%), click through rate (down 1% to 2.5%), and page completion rate (down 4%, to 76%). ^[1]
• The unsubscribe rate fell to 0.12%, 13% lower than in the previous year. ^[1]
• Fundraising email response rate declined by 6% in 2017, to 0.06%. ^[1]
• As with advocacy messages, small drops were reported for open rate (down 1% to 15%), click through rate (down 6% to 0.42%), and page completion rate (down 6%, to 16%). ^[1]
• The unsubscribe rate fell to 0.18%, 3% lower than in the previous year. ^[1]
• Walk/run/cycling event fundraisers who send more than 15 emails raise 76% more than non. ^[1]
• 79% of fundraising emails do not personalize their “To” line with a first and last name. ^[1]
• 90% visit website first before calling. ^[1]
• 96% leave without making a purchase. ^[1]
• Direct mail with digital ads yields 28% higher conversion rate. ^[1]
• Marketing campaigns that used direct mail and 1 or more digital media experienced 118% lift in response rate compared to using direct mail only. ^[1]
• Website visitors who are retargeted are 70% more likely to convert. ^[1]
• 26% of customers will return to a site through retargeting. ^[1]
• The volume of direct mail went down to 149.4 billion in 2016, but direct mail as a percentage of all mail went up. ^[1]
• Direct mail response rates in 2016 were 5.3% for house file and 2.9% for prospect lists. ^[1]
• At 6.6%, oversized envelopes have the greatest household response rates over other mediums (followed by postcards at 5.7% and letter sized envelopes at 4.3%). ^[1]
• At 37%, oversized envelopes have the greatest household return on investment over other mediums (followed by postcards and letter sized envelopes at 29%). ^[1]
• The top response rate tracking methods are online tracking such as PURLs (61%), call center or telephone (53%), and code or coupon (42%). ^[1]
• Adding a person’s name and full color in the direct mail can increase response by 135%. ^[1]
• Adding a person’s name, full color and more sophisticated database information can increase the response rate by up to 500% vs not doing any of these things. ^[1]
• Targeting customers on a 11 level increases response rates up to 50% or more. ^[1]
• 73% of firms aspire to be data driven but only 29% of firms succeed at turning data into action. ^[1]
• 13% of emails are opened and read within five minutes. ^[1]
• 17% of people who send their support from email are doing so on a mobile device. ^[1]
• The open rate for nonprofit emails specifically is between 15% and 18% on average. ^[1]
• Emails with social sharing options increase click through rates by 158%. ^[1]
• 88% of surveyed HR executives believe effective employee engagement programs help attract and retain employees. ^[8]
• 88% of Millennials consider their job more fulfilling when they have opportunities to have a positive impact on society. ^[8]
• Employees who engage in corporate giving programs tend to have 75% longer tenures with the company. ^[8]
• 71% of surveyed employees say it’s very important to work at a company that supports giving and volunteering. ^[8]
• 55% of employees would choose to work for a socially responsible company, even if it meant earning a lower salary. ^[8]
• 77% of Millennials say a sense of purpose is part of the reason they selected their current employer. ^[8]
• The median employee participation rate for matching gift programs is 9%. ^[8]
• An estimated $2 3 billion is donated through matching gift programs each year. ^[8]
• 11% of total corporate cash contributions to nonprofits are made through matching gift programs. ^[8]
• As of 2021, 65% of Fortune 500 companies match employee donations. ^[8]
• 84% of donors say they’re more likely to donate if a match is available. ^[8]
• Only 1.31% of individual contributions are matched at the average nonprofit. ^[8]
• 86% of donors want to give their original donation directly through the nonprofit’s website. ^[8]
• Sending matching gift reminder emails within 24 hours of a donation results in a 53% open rate—that’s 2 3 times higher than the average nonprofit email open rate. ^[8]
• Mentioning matching gifts in fundraising appeals results in a 71% increase in response rate and a 51% increase in average donation amount. ^[8]
• 91% of participating companies match donations at a 11 ratio. ^[8]
• For example, a limit beyond $10,000 results in a spike in engagement of up to 40%. ^[8]
• More than 96% of employees have a strong preference for their company to match donations made directly to a nonprofit, rather than only matching donations through a CSR platform. ^[8]
• As of 2021, 40% of Fortune 500 companies offer volunteer grant programs. ^[8]
• Almost 60% of companies offer paid time off so their employees can volunteer. ^[8]
• 82% of companies report that their employees want to volunteer with their peers in a corporate. ^[8]
• 93% of employees who volunteer are somewhat satisfied or very satisfied with their employer. ^[8]
• 96% of employees who volunteer say that their company’s culture is somewhat positive or very positive. ^[8]
• 61% of Millennials who rarely or never volunteer still consider a company’s commitment to the greater good when deciding on a potential job. ^[8]
• This reflects a 5.1% increase from 2019.1 Corporate giving in 2020 decreased to $16.88 billion—a 6.1% decrease from 2019.1 Foundation giving in 2020 increased to $88.55 billion—a 19% increase from 2019.1. ^[9]
• In 2020, the largest source of charitable giving came from individuals at $324.10 billion, or 69% of total giving. ^[9]
• Other sources of charitable giving were giving by foundations ($88.55 billion/19% of the total share of American giving), bequests ($41.91 billion/9%), and corporations ($16.88 billion/4%). ^[9]
• In 2020, the majority of charitable dollars went to religion (28%), education (15%), human services (14%), grantmaking foundations (12%). ^[9]
• Giving in 2020 increased in nearly every sector, with doubledigit growth in gifts for public society benefit (15.7%), environment/animals (11.6%) and individuals (12.8%). ^[9]
• Charitable giving accounted for 2.3% of gross domestic product in 2020.1. ^[9]
• Adults are more likely to give to charity if their parents gave to charity.4. ^[9]
• An estimated 25.1 percent of US adults volunteered in 2017, contributing an estimated 8.8 billion hours, valued at approximately $195.0 billion.5. ^[9]
• Approximately 77 million Americans—30% of the adult population—volunteer their time, talents, and energy to making a difference.6. ^[9]
• The top four national volunteer activities are fundraising or selling items to raise money (36.0%); food collection or distribution (34.2%); collecting, making or distributing clothing, crafts or other goods (26.5%); and mentoring youth (26.2%). ^[9]
• The top four types of organizations by volunteering are religious (32.0%); sport, hobby, cultural or arts (25.7%); educational or youth service (19.2%); and civic, political, professional or international (6.2%). ^[9]
• TikTok is the fastest growing social network with a staggering105% user growth ratein the US over the past two years. ^[4]
• Instagram sits in second place (78%). ^[4]
• Facebook is responsible fora quarter of(25%) versus Google (28.9%), Amazon (10.3%) and others (35.6%). ^[4]
• Instagram dominates social streaming services in terms of engagement . ^[4]
• Engagement rates on Instagram are approximately more thansix times higherthan those on Facebook (0.83% to 0.13%). ^[4]
• Instagram Stories (83%) and grid posts (93%). ^[4]
• Uses of the “#ad” tag on Instagramdecreased 17% over the past yearamong influencers. ^[4]
• 44% of usersshop for products on Instagram weekly . ^[4]
• Linkedin ad revenue recently exceeded$1 billion in 2021, growing by 37% while organic session engagement grew by a record 22%. ^[4]
• the platform daily (versus 48.5% that log in monthly). ^[4]
• LinkedIn has one of the highestearning and most educated bases on social media —51% college educatedwith half of users earning more than $75,000 annually. ^[4]
• earn53% more engagementand twice the CTR of employee. ^[4]
• 52% of Twitter usersuse the platform daily (versus 84% that use it weekly). ^[4]
• Twitter’s US advertising revenue totaled $647 million in Q3 2021, anincrease of 51% YoY(and up 98% from the previous quarter). ^[4]
• Shoppers on Pinterest have85% larger shopping cartsthan buyers on other platforms. ^[4]
• According to the platform themselves,7 in 10 Pinnerssay that Pinterest is their go to place to find products or services they can trust. ^[4]
• are40% more likelyto say they love shopping. ^[4]
• 62% of TikTok userssay that platform specific branded content is the best way to connect to customers. ^[4]
• 39% of Gen Z consumerssay that their purchasing decisions are influenced directly by what they see on TikTok. ^[4]
• TikTok sawthe largest increasein planned new platform investment for brands in 2024 (84%) versus YouTube (66%) and Instagram (64%). ^[4]
• Influencers withless than 5k followerssee the highest engagement rates on TikTok (17.9%) vs macro influencers with up to 1 million followers (13.48%). ^[4]
• Social media recently overtook paid search as an advertising channel,growing 25% YoYand exceeding $137 billion. ^[4]
• Social media usersoverwhelmingly trust other usersas their “preferred” form of influencer, most likely to buy from them based on a product recommendation (37%) versus celebrities (7%). ^[4]
• Privacy and data protection are “extremely impactful” and important to52% of social media users. ^[4]
• The Society for Human Resource Management says around 21% of American companies offer VTO, while CECP claims more than 60% of enterpriselevel companies are going all. ^[10]
• The 2019 Global Talent Trends Study showed that 51% of employees wish their company offered more flexible work options. ^[10]
• An article from NP Source showed employees who engaged in corporate giving programs tended to have 75% longer tenures with the company. ^[10]
• According to that same NP Source article, 90% of companies indicated that partnering with reputable nonprofit organizations enhances their brand and 89% believe partnering leverages their ability to improve the community. ^[10]
• A 2017 study from Project ROI showed that companies investing in corporate responsibility are seeing the fruits of their labor Turnover reduced by 50% Employee productivity increase by up to 13% Employee engagement increased by up to 7.5%. ^[10]
• Turnover reduced by 50% Employee productivity increase by up to 13%. ^[10]
• Employee engagement increased by up to 7.5%. ^[10]
• A 2017 Glassdoor survey showed that 75% of employees expect their employer to get involved in charity work either through donations or volunteer efforts. ^[10]
• NP Source showed that 92% of surveyed HR executives agree that contributing business skills and expertise to a nonprofit can be an effective way to improve employees’ leadership and broader professional skill sets. ^[10]
• 40% of Fortune 500 companies offer volunteer grant programs. ^[2]
• For example 65% of Fortune 500 companies offer matching gift programs. ^[2]
• 12% of total corporate cash contributions to nonprofits are made through matching gift programs. ^[2]
• For example 40% of Fortune 500 companies offer volunteer grant programs. ^[2]
• 80% of companies with volunteer grant programs provide between $8 $15 per hour volunteered. ^[2]
• The average corporate volunteer participation rate is 30%. ^[2]
• According to their CSR initiative, Microsoft has committed to helping reduce operational emissions by 2030. ^[2]

I know you want to use Corporate Volunteering Platforms, thus we made this list of best Corporate Volunteering Platforms. We also wrote about how to learn Corporate Volunteering Platforms and how to install Corporate Volunteering Platforms. Recently we wrote how to uninstall Corporate Volunteering Platforms for newbie users. Don’t forgot to check latest Corporate Volunteering Platformsstatistics of 2024.

Reference

1. charities – https://www.charities.org/facts-statistics-workplace-giving-matching-gifts-and-volunteer-programs.
2. nonprofitssource – https://nonprofitssource.com/online-giving-statistics/.
3. 360matchpro – https://360matchpro.com/corporate-social-responsibility/.
4. brightfunds – https://hello.brightfunds.org/employee-volunteering-software/.
5. sproutsocial – https://sproutsocial.com/insights/social-media-statistics/.
6. initlive – https://www.initlive.com/blog/20-volunteer-statistics-every-nonprofit-should-know.
7. volunteerhub – https://www.volunteerhub.com/blog/40-volunteer-statistics/.
8. doublethedonation – https://doublethedonation.com/tips/matching-grant-resources/matching-gift-statistics/.
9. recharity – https://recharity.ca/corporate-giving-statistics/.
10. nptrust – https://www.nptrust.org/philanthropic-resources/charitable-giving-statistics/.
11. g2 – https://learn.g2.com/vto.

How Useful is Corporate Volunteering Platforms

One of the key benefits of corporate volunteering platforms is the positive impact they can have on employee morale and engagement. Giving employees the opportunity to volunteer and support causes they are passionate about can help foster a sense of purpose and fulfillment in their work. When employees feel like they are making a difference in the world, they are more likely to be engaged and motivated in their roles.

In addition to boosting employee morale, corporate volunteering platforms can also help companies build stronger relationships with their local communities. By partnering with nonprofit organizations and other community groups, businesses can demonstrate their commitment to social responsibility and create lasting connections with the people they serve. This can not only enhance a company’s reputation but also help to build trust and loyalty among customers and stakeholders.

Furthermore, corporate volunteering platforms can provide employees with valuable opportunities for personal and professional growth. Whether it’s developing new skills through skills-based volunteering or networking with peers and community leaders, volunteering can help employees expand their knowledge and experience in ways that can benefit both their careers and their personal lives.

From a business perspective, corporate volunteering platforms can also offer tangible benefits to companies. Engaging employees in volunteer activities can help enhance teamwork and collaboration, as employees work together towards a common goal outside of the office. This can lead to improved communication, productivity, and overall job satisfaction among team members.

Additionally, participating in volunteer activities can help companies attract and retain top talent. Millennials and Gen Z employees, in particular, value social responsibility and are more likely to choose employers that prioritize giving back to their communities. By offering robust corporate volunteering programs, companies can differentiate themselves in a competitive job market and attract employees who share their values.

In conclusion, corporate volunteering platforms have proven to be valuable tools for companies looking to engage employees, give back to their communities, and enhance their corporate social responsibility efforts. These platforms offer a wide range of benefits, from boosting employee morale and teamwork to strengthening community relationships and attracting top talent. As the importance of corporate social responsibility continues to grow, investing in a corporate volunteering platform is a worthwhile endeavor for any organization looking to make a positive impact on the world around them.

In Conclusion

Be it Corporate Volunteering Platforms benefits statistics, Corporate Volunteering Platforms usage statistics, Corporate Volunteering Platforms productivity statistics, Corporate Volunteering Platforms adoption statistics, Corporate Volunteering Platforms roi statistics, Corporate Volunteering Platforms market statistics, statistics on use of Corporate Volunteering Platforms, Corporate Volunteering Platforms analytics statistics, statistics of companies that use Corporate Volunteering Platforms, statistics small businesses using Corporate Volunteering Platforms, top Corporate Volunteering Platforms systems usa statistics, Corporate Volunteering Platforms software market statistics, statistics dissatisfied with Corporate Volunteering Platforms, statistics of businesses using Corporate Volunteering Platforms, Corporate Volunteering Platforms key statistics, Corporate Volunteering Platforms systems statistics, nonprofit Corporate Volunteering Platforms statistics, Corporate Volunteering Platforms failure statistics, top Corporate Volunteering Platforms statistics, best Corporate Volunteering Platforms statistics, Corporate Volunteering Platforms statistics small business, Corporate Volunteering Platforms statistics 2024, Corporate Volunteering Platforms statistics 2021, Corporate Volunteering Platforms statistics 2024 you will find all from this page. 🙂

We tried our best to provide all the Corporate Volunteering Platforms statistics on this page. Please comment below and share your opinion if we missed any Corporate Volunteering Platforms statistics.