Email Anti-spam Statistics 2024 – Everything You Need to Know

Are you looking to add Email Anti-spam to your arsenal of tools? Maybe for your business or personal use only, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to know more about the most important Email Anti-spam statistics of 2024.

My team and I scanned the entire web and collected all the most useful Email Anti-spam stats on this page. You don’t need to check any other resource on the web for any Email Anti-spam statistics. All are here only 🙂

How much of an impact will Email Anti-spam have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your business? Should you invest in Email Anti-spam? We will answer all your Email Anti-spam related questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any word. 🙂

Best Email Anti-spam Statistics

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 121 Email Anti-spam Statistics on this page 🙂

Email Anti-spam Market Statistics

  • Spam folder statistics suggest that 85% of marketing emails bypass spam filters and arrive in users’ inboxes. [0]
  • The ROI of marketing via mail is a whopping 1,300%. [1]
  • Customers trust print mail marketing more than email, although email marketing has nearly three times higher ROI at 3,800%. [1]
  • Since it’s not generally considered a type of spam advertising, text message marketing software and services are a great opportunity to engage consumers, with campaigns producing a 14% conversion rate. [1]
  • Still, 49% more clicks is impressive, making this one of my favorite email marketing statistics. [2]

Email Anti-spam Software Statistics

  • Since it’s not generally considered a type of spam advertising, text message marketing software and services are a great opportunity to engage consumers, with campaigns producing a 14% conversion rate. [1]
  • In June 2015, the volume of spam emails went down to 49.7% and in July 2015 the figures was further reduced to 46.4% according to anti virus software developer Symantec. [3]

Email Anti-spam Latest Statistics

  • According to Nucleus Research, the average loss per employee was about $1,934 per year. [0]
  • According to internet spam statistics, there are approximately 100 gangs that run the business in Europe and North America. [0]
  • Scams and fraud make up only 2.5% of all spam emails. [0]
  • However, identity theft is the goal of 73% of those emails. [0]
  • And only 3% of those emails are reported to the management. [0]
  • Spam scams are also directed toward acquiring LinkedIn (6%) and Amazon credentials (5%). [0]
  • Previously, every tenth spam message involved this payment processor, and now only 2% of the spammers try to impersonate it. [0]
  • Between Q1 2020 and Q2 2020, we witnessed a 112% spike in the number of incidents involving payment and invoice fraud. [0]
  • In a recent Microsoft survey, 62% of security professionals reported that phishing campaigns are the biggest security threat. [0]
  • According to social engineering spam email statistics, the Nigerian style emails cost their victims in the US an average of $2,133 per person affected, over the past three years. [0]
  • Spam accounts for 85% of the total email traffic worldwide. [0]
  • That’s about 85% of the world’s daily email traffic. [0]
  • While most spam is just annoying and time consuming, about 2.5% of it can do some serious damage. [0]
  • Phishing attacks statistics suggest that as much as 73% of malware infected spam mail is intended for identity theft. [0]
  • 94% of malware is delivered via email. [1]
  • An extreme group of circa 100 spam gangs generates up to 80% of all Internet spam. [1]
  • 98.3% of spam content on LinkedIn was taken down by its automated defenses. [1]
  • A high increase in spam emails, at over 47%, happened in 2020. [1]
  • The rates are much lower compared to 2012, which recorded a peak annual spam rate of 69%. [1]
  • An investigation of malware concluded that a whopping 94% used email as a delivery method. [1]
  • The most common spam emails include an attachment, with 45% of malware files being Office doc files. [1]
  • At 26%, Windows apps were second, as another type of malware delivery through spam mail. [1]
  • Google has successfully blocked 99.9% of spam email, including phishing. [1]
  • A study from 2015 about email deliverability shows that 14% of online fundraising emails end up directly in spam folders. [1]
  • Statistics about spam show that every 1% of emails treated as spam results in a $1,203.84 loss in potential revenue, placing the total sum for a year between $14,000 and $15,000. [1]
  • The direct mail industry is on the rise over the last decade, and 43% of the US population finds it less annoying than the Internet. [1]
  • As a result, targeted campaigns increase donations by 40%. [1]
  • Internet spam statistics rank the entries by the share of worldwide spam volume Russia (23.5%). [1]
  • The US (10.8%) France (6.7%) China (6.3%). [1]
  • Germany was the next most targeted with 7.05%, followed by Russia (5.87%), Italy (5.52%), Vietnam (4.93%), UAE (4.39%), and Mexico (4.2%). [1]
  • According to statistics about spam, the recovery rate for 2020 was an astounding 82%, which is a slight increase from 2019’s 79%. [1]
  • They take both fake accounts and spam or scam content down before other members can see it 98.3% of the time. [1]
  • Instagram bots comprise 15% of all users. [1]
  • COVID 19 marked the year, and the growth from 2019 is an appalling 30%. [1]
  • The estimate for the total amount of money lost to phone scams meanwhile stands at $19.7 billion, according to spam call statistics. [1]
  • With an increase of a whopping 56%, US citizens were receiving 28.4 spam calls monthly. [1]
  • Brazil has been holding the top spot for years now, with 2020 results being 49.9, according to spam statistics. [1]
  • Statistics about spam indicate that over 50% of all email in recent years is spam. [1]
  • Data from 2020 points to an average percentage of 47.3%. [1]
  • With over 50% being cases of spam email, about 150 billion spam emails are sent and received daily. [1]
  • Email spam has steadily grown since the early 1990s, and by 2014 was estimated to account for around 90% of total email traffic. [4]
  • Mainsleaze makes up approximately 3% of the spam sent over the internet. [4]
  • According to a Cyberoam report in 2014, there are an average of 54 billion spam messages sent every day. “. [4]
  • Pharmaceutical products jumped up 45% from last quarter’s analysis, leading this quarter’s spam pack. [4]
  • Emails purporting to offer jobs with fast, easy cash come in at number two, accounting for approximately 15% of all spam email. [4]
  • And, rounding off at number three are spam emails about diet products , accounting for approximately 1%.”[10]. [4]
  • In 2004, less than one percent of spam complied with CAN SPAM, although a 2005 review by the Federal Trade Commission claimed that the amount of sexually explicit spam had significantly decreased since 2003 and the total volume had begun to level off. [4]
  • In June 2006, an estimated 80 percent of email spam was sent by zombie PCs, an increase of 30 percent from the prior year. [4]
  • An estimated 55 billion email spam were sent each day in June 2006, an increase of 25 billion per day from June 2005.[41]. [4]
  • For the first quarter of 2010, an estimated 305,000 newly activated zombie PCs were brought online each day for malicious activity. [4]
  • Brazil was the source of 20 percent of all zombies, which is down from 14 percent from the fourth quarter of 2009. [4]
  • India had 10 percent, with Vietnam at 8 percent, and the Russian Federation at 7 percent.[42]. [4]
  • The amount of spam that users see in their mailboxes is only a portion of total spam sent, since spammers’ lists often contain a large percentage of invalid addresses and many spam filters simply delete or reject “obvious spam”.[44]. [4]
  • As of August 2010, the number of spam messages sent per day was estimated to be around 200 billion. [4]
  • A 2010 survey of US and European email users showed that 46% of the respondents had opened spam messages, although only 11% had clicked on a link.[52]. [4]
  • According to Steve Ballmer in 2004, Microsoft founder Bill Gates receives four million emails per year, most of them spam. [4]
  • A 2004 survey estimated that lost productivity costs Internet users in the United States $21.58 billion annually, while another reported the cost at $17 billion, up from $11 billion in 2003. [4]
  • In 2004, the worldwide productivity cost of spam has been estimated to be $50 billion in 2005.[56]. [4]
  • As much as 80% of spam received by Internet users in North America and Europe can be traced to fewer than 200 spammers.[58]. [4]
  • In terms of volume of spam According to Sophos, the major sources of spam in the fourth quarter of 2008 were[11][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67]. [4]
  • The United States (the origin of 19.8% of spam messages, up from 18.9% in Q3) China (9.9%, up from 5.4%) Russia (6.4%, down from 8.3%) Brazil (6.3%, up from 4.5%). [4]
  • When grouped by continents, spam comes mostly from Asia (37.8%, down from 39.8%). [4]
  • North America (23.6%, up from 21.8%) Europe . [4]
  • South America (12.9%, down from 13.2%). [4]
  • According to your stats, you have thousands of emails scanned per day, and none of the… Erdem0423. [5]
  • The percentage of spam in total email traffic during the first quarter this year came to 66.34%, down 6.42 percentage points from the previous quarter. [6]
  • The percentage of phishing emails grew threefold and accounted for 0.0071%. [6]
  • the percentage of spam in total email barely changed The distribution of sources of spam by country, Q1 2014. [6]
  • China , the US and South Korea. [6]
  • 90% of spam is in English. [7]
  • A year ago it was 96%, so spam is getting more “international.”. [7]
  • 88% of all spam is sent from botnets. [7]
  • 91% of spam contains some form of link. [7]
  • Only 0.7% of spam is sent from webmail accounts. [7]
  • 91% of Americans say they want to get promotional emails from companies they do business with. [2]
  • 91% of people wanted at least some promotional emails. [2]
  • Over 60% of respondents said they wanted to get promotional emails from brands at least weekly. [2]
  • 68% of millennials say they’ve made purchasing decisions based on promotional emails. [2]
  • 68% percent of them say they’ve made purchasing decisions because of promotional emails. [2]
  • On average, segmented campaigns get 23% more opens and 49% more clicks than unsegmented ones. [2]
  • When they looked at emails sent through their service, they found segmented campaigns performed much better than unsegmented ones – a whopping 49% better. [2]
  • 31% of people like to get emails from brands once a week. [2]
  • 39% of email opens in 2020 were on mobile devices. [2]
  • In a recent report, Litmus analyzed 10 billion email opens and found 39% of them were on mobile devices. [2]
  • 60% of people said they check email while watching TV. [2]
  • The average click through rate is 2.6%, but 1.3% is normal in some industries. [2]
  • Publishing and media, for example, tends to have a high click rate of about 4.6%. [2]
  • On the end of the spectrum, 1.3% is normal in the restaurant industry. [2]
  • The menace of spam email is on the increase on yearly basis and is responsible for over 77% of the whole global email traffic [3]. [3]
  • According to report from Kaspersky lab, in 2015, the volume of spam emails being sent reduced to a 12. [3]
  • Spam email volume fell below 50% for the first time since 2003. [3]
  • By that time the volume of spam emails had skyrocketed to an average of 56.92% for the first quarter of 2016. [3]
  • Latest statistics shows that spam messages accounted for 56.87% of e mail traffic worldwide and the most familiar types of spam emails were healthcare and dating spam. [3]
  • The machine learning model used by Google have now advanced to the point that it can detect and filter out spam and phishing emails with about 99.9 percent accuracy. [3]
  • Statistics from Google revealed that between 50 70 percent of emails that Gmail receives are unsolicited mail. [3]
  • Only about 0.05 percent of emails are affected by this deliberate delay. [3]
  • It has been reported that about 20 percent of authorization based emails usually fail to get to the inbox of the expected recipient. [3]
  • Statistics shows that their site receives about eight billion emails a day and out of which 30%–35% of those emails are delivered to the users’ inboxes. [3]
  • According to [53], ML algorithms have the capacity to perform better based on their experience. [3]
  • According to [63], the token T which denote the spamminess is computed as illustrated in Eq. [3]
  • NaĂŻve Bayes is an excellent method for spam classification with high accuracy (99.99+%). [3]
  • For instance, Google recounted the increase in Gmail spam filters’ accuracy from 99.5% to 99.9% after incorporating neural networks into it. [3]
  • According to [65], there are generally three kinds of units.•f=. [3]
  • According to [75], it can be observed that Rough Set techniques allow users to evaluate the significance of data. [3]
  • According to [28,98], decision tree induction is a distinctive technique that leads to gaining knowledge on classification. [3]
  • According to [94], the deep learning methods can be categorised into the following1.Unsupervised Deep networks. [3]
  • Pre trainingDNNsor s using a set of normalized deep autoencoders, including denoising autoencoders, contractive autoencoders, and sparse autoencodersAccording to [95] the Convolutional Neural Network has been a hot research area of late. [3]
  • The classification using Bayesian filter is done according to the method defined by Graham [114]. [3]
  • As a matter of fact, manipulating as minute as 1% of the training data is enough in certain instances [120]. [3]
  • We find that in passive attacks without any filter feedback, an attacker can get 50 % of currently blocked spam past either filter by adding 150 words or fewer. [8]
  • Some 320 billion spam emails are sent every day, and 94% of malware is delivered via this medium. [9]
  • According to Google, its Gmail service blocks more than 100 million phishing emails every single day, 18 million of them related to COVID 19 in some way. [9]
  • With as much as 94% of malware being delivered by email, and one in every 3,000 email messages containing malware payloads, spam remains a very real problem in 2020. [9]
  • Thankfully, email applications now come with antispam measures built in, and the likes of Gmail, for example, reckon the machine learning algorithms that power the spam filtering for 1.5 billion Google email users are 99.9% accurate. [9]

I know you want to use Email Anti-spam Software, thus we made this list of best Email Anti-spam Software. We also wrote about how to learn Email Anti-spam Software and how to install Email Anti-spam Software. Recently we wrote how to uninstall Email Anti-spam Software for newbie users. Don’t forgot to check latest Email Anti-spam statistics of 2024.

Reference


  1. dataprot – https://dataprot.net/statistics/spam-statistics/.
  2. 99firms – https://99firms.com/blog/spam-statistics/.
  3. canto – https://www.canto.com/blog/email-marketing-statistics/.
  4. sciencedirect – https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844018353404.
  5. wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_spam.
  6. juniper – https://community.juniper.net/viewthread?MID=65944.
  7. kaspersky – https://usa.kaspersky.com/resource-center/threats/spam-statistics-report-q1-2014.
  8. antispamengine – https://antispamengine.com/spam-statistics/.
  9. psu – http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.130.9846.
  10. forbes – https://www.forbes.com/sites/daveywinder/2020/05/03/this-surprisingly-simple-email-trick-will-stop-spam-with-one-click/.

How Useful is Email Anti Spam

On a basic level, email anti-spam filters do serve a valuable purpose. They help to weed out the countless emails from unknown senders promoting questionable products or phishing schemes. By identifying these potentially harmful messages and diverting them to the spam folder, these tools protect users from falling victim to scams or malware hidden within seemingly innocent emails.

For individuals and businesses alike, this added layer of security can be invaluable. It saves time and effort by reducing the need to manually sort through spam messages, allowing users to focus on their important emails without the distraction of unwanted clutter.

However, email anti-spam software is not foolproof. While it can catch a significant portion of spam messages, some may still slip through the cracks. This can be frustrating for users who rely on their filters to provide a spam-free inbox. In some cases, legitimate emails may even be incorrectly flagged as spam, leading to missed opportunities or important communication being overlooked.

Additionally, spammers are constantly evolving their tactics to bypass these filters. They may disguise their messages with clever subject lines or tweak their content to avoid detection. As a result, email anti-spam software must constantly be updated and refined to keep pace with these ever-changing tactics. This can be a challenge for developers and may result in a cat-and-mouse game between spammers and those working to thwart them.

Another consideration is the impact of false positives. In their quest to block as much spam as possible, some filters may be overly aggressive and erroneously flag legitimate emails as spam. This can be frustrating for both senders and recipients, especially in a business setting where important messages may be missed or delayed.

Despite these drawbacks, email anti-spam software remains an essential tool in the fight against unwanted email. While not perfect, these filters do provide a valuable service by catching a significant amount of spam and protecting users from potential threats. It is important for users to remember that no technology is fail-safe and to remain vigilant in their own email practices, being cautious of suspicious messages and avoiding clicking on unknown links or attachments.

In conclusion, while email anti-spam software is not without its limitations, it does play a critical role in maintaining the integrity and security of our email communications. By working in tandem with user awareness and best practices, these filters can help to keep our inboxes safe and free from unwanted distractions.

In Conclusion

Be it Email Anti-spam benefits statistics, Email Anti-spam usage statistics, Email Anti-spam productivity statistics, Email Anti-spam adoption statistics, Email Anti-spam roi statistics, Email Anti-spam market statistics, statistics on use of Email Anti-spam, Email Anti-spam analytics statistics, statistics of companies that use Email Anti-spam, statistics small businesses using Email Anti-spam, top Email Anti-spam systems usa statistics, Email Anti-spam software market statistics, statistics dissatisfied with Email Anti-spam, statistics of businesses using Email Anti-spam, Email Anti-spam key statistics, Email Anti-spam systems statistics, nonprofit Email Anti-spam statistics, Email Anti-spam failure statistics, top Email Anti-spam statistics, best Email Anti-spam statistics, Email Anti-spam statistics small business, Email Anti-spam statistics 2024, Email Anti-spam statistics 2021, Email Anti-spam statistics 2024 you will find all from this page. 🙂

We tried our best to provide all the Email Anti-spam statistics on this page. Please comment below and share your opinion if we missed any Email Anti-spam statistics.

Leave a Comment