Malware Analysis Tools Statistics 2024 – Everything You Need to Know

by

Are you looking to add Malware Analysis Tools to your arsenal of tools? Maybe for your business or personal use only, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to know more about the most important Malware Analysis Tools statistics of 2024.

My team and I scanned the entire web and collected all the most useful Malware Analysis Tools stats on this page. You don’t need to check any other resource on the web for any Malware Analysis Tools statistics. All are here only 🙂

How much of an impact will Malware Analysis Tools have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your business? Should you invest in Malware Analysis Tools? We will answer all your Malware Analysis Tools related questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any word. 🙂

Best Malware Analysis Tools Statistics

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 127 Malware Analysis Tools Statistics on this page 🙂

Malware Analysis Tools Usage Statistics

  • In this report, the SVM method has most percentage for malware detection approach with 29%, j48 has 17%, NB has 10%, RF has 5%, ANN has 3% and the other methods have less than 2% usage in data mining results. [0]
  • The symbolic code aggregation case studies in windows based platform has 23%, the pattern mining has 11%, the system calls has 8% usage in malware detection. [0]
  • The most data analysis methods have used dynamic analysis with 51%, the hybrid analysis has 29% and the static analysis has 20% usage. [0]
  • As the experimental results, we observed that the SVM method has most percentage for malware detection approach with 29%, j48 has 17%, Decision tree has 14%, NB has 10%, BF has 5% and the other methods have less than 3% usage in data mining results. [0]

Malware Analysis Tools Latest Statistics

  • Due to the rise in remote work prompted by the pandemic, attacks are up 148%. [1]
  • As the average ransom demanded by hackers has increased by 33% since Q3 2019 , affiliates are making up to 80% from each payment. [1]
  • Malicious emails are up 600% due to COVID. [1]
  • 37% of respondents’ organizations were affected by ransomware attacks in the last year. [1]
  • Out of 1,086 organizations whose data had been encrypted, 96% got their data back. [1]
  • 71% of those who are affected by ransomware have been infected. [1]
  • 65% of employers allow their employees to access company applications from unmanaged, personal devices. [1]
  • From a survey conducted with 1,263 companies, 80% of victims who submitted a ransom payment experienced another attack soon after, and 46% got access to their data but most of it was corrupted. [1]
  • Additionally, 60% of survey respondents experienced revenue loss and 53% stated their brands were damaged as a result. [1]
  • 29% of respondents stated their companies were forced to remove jobs following a ransomware attack. [1]
  • 42% of companies with cyber insurance policies in place indicated that insurance only covered a small part of damages resulting from a ransomware attack. [1]
  • In 2019, nearly 56% of organizations across multiple industries reported a ransomware attack. [1]
  • Healthcare organizations dedicate only around 6% of their budget to cybersecurity measures. [1]
  • Ransomware attacks were responsible for almost 50% of all healthcare data breaches in 2020. [1]
  • Healthcare received 88%t of all ransomware attacks in the United States in 2016. [1]
  • Ransomware attacks against universities increased by 100% between 2019 and 2020. [1]
  • 66% of universities lack basic email security configurations. [1]
  • 38% of analyzed universities in the Cybersecurity in Higher Education Report had unsecured or open database ports. [1]
  • Cyberattacks against K 12 schools rose 18% in 2020. [1]
  • 62% of all records leaked in 2019 were from financial institutions. [1]
  • 90% of financial institutions have been targeted by ransomware attacks. [1]
  • In 2020, 70% of the 52% of attacks that went after financial institutions came from the Kryptik Trojan malware. [1]
  • Banks experienced a 520% increase in phishing and ransomware attempts between March and June in 2020. [1]
  • In 2020, 33% of attacks on governmental bodies were ransomware. [1]
  • Only around 38% of local and state government employees are trained in ransomware attack prevention. [1]
  • In 2019, attacks against municipalities increased 60% from the year before. [1]
  • In 2017, mobile malware variants increased by 54%. [1]
  • Fewer than 20% of mobile malware is delivered via browser. [1]
  • In 2017, 95% of all ransom payments were cashed out via BTC e, a Bitcoin platform. [1]
  • In 2020, ransomware payments were 7% of all funds received by cryptocurrency addresses. [1]
  • Cryptocurrency transactions can be traced back to the individual 60% of the time. [1]
  • Illegal activity represented 2.1% of all cryptocurrency transaction volume or about $21.4 billion worth of transfers in 2019. [1]
  • In Q1 2017, FedEx lost an estimated $300 million from the NotPetya ransomware attack. [1]
  • Downtime costs are up 200% yearover. [1]
  • 84% of organizations will keep remote work as the norm even after COVID 19 restrictions are lifted, resulting in an increase of internet users and a greater risk of data exposure. [1]
  • According to Verizon’s 2018 Data Breach Investigations Report, phishing is involved in 70% of data breaches. [1]
  • Ransomware accounted for 15% of cyberattack incidents in the U.S. in 2018. [1]
  • In 2020, the average payout was $312,493, a 171% increase compared to 2019. [1]
  • The results of our experiments show that the proposed nonsignature based technique surpasses the existing techniques and achieves more than 90% detection accuracy. [2]
  • In 2020, 61% of organizations experienced malware activity that spread from one employee to another. [3]
  • In 2021, that number rose to 74%, its highest since the SOES survey began in 2016. [3]
  • In its 2021 State of Email Security Report, Mimecast found that 61% of organizations experienced a ransomware attack that led to at least a partial disruption of business operations. [3]
  • The previous year, 51% of organizations reported experiencing these types of malware attacks, so the number has risen substantially. [3]
  • Organizations worldwide report ransomware attacks impacting business, but it seems businesses in the US and UK have been hit the hardest in the past year, with 52% and 51% of companies impacted, respectively. [3]
  • This is a slight reduction from last year, though, when 55% of American businesses were victims of ransomware attacks. [3]
  • However, in 2019, only 54% of UK businesses report being impacted by ransomware. [3]
  • In its 2021 State of Cybersecurity Report, ISACA found that 61% of cybersecurity professionals believe their organization’s cybersecurity team is understaffed. [3]
  • Almost half (47%). [3]
  • A further 34% reported that their organization is “appropriately” staffed, while just 4% reported being either “somewhat” or “significantly” overstaffed. [3]
  • The SecureList IT Threat Evolution report for Q3 of 2021 shows that ransomware modifications are rarer (reduced by 36.2%). [3]
  • According to Google’s Transparency Report, 2.195 million websites made its list of “Sites Deemed Dangerous by Safe Browsing” category, as of January 17, 2021. [3]
  • That’s more than a 800 percent difference in favor of phishing sites, which have seen a yearover year increase of 28 percent. [3]
  • According to SonicWall’s 2020 Cyber Threat Report, the company detected 9.9 million malware attacks in 2019, compared to 10.5 million in 2018. [3]
  • SonicWall reported 5.6 billion malware attacks took place in 2020, which sounds bad but actually represents a 43% decrease from the previous year. [3]
  • Kaspersky Labs reported that of all the users of its mobile security product worldwide, Iran faced the highest number of malware attacks in Q2 2021 with the share of mobile users attacked reaching a significant 23.79%. [3]
  • On the report, Bangladesh’s mobile users who suffered an attack were over half that of Iran with 11.31% of the users surveyed. [3]
  • 2021 report found that attacks on the tens of thousands of non standard ports available increased from 2019’s 13% to 25% in 2020. [3]
  • The vast majority of attacks still a problem for standard ports, such as HTTP. [3]
  • In 2020, SonicWall found malware was down 43% but ransomware was up a record 62% while IoT malware saw a 66% increase with a total of 56.9 million attacks against IoT devices. [3]
  • This was an increase of 74% from 2019 when SonicWall recorded a total of 153,909 “neverbefore. [3]
  • SonicWall found almost 25% of “neverbefore seen” malware files were couched in Office files. [3]
  • Nearly 10% were carried in PDF files. [3]
  • Cryptojacking rose 28% in 2020 with 81.9 million attempts compared to the 64.1 million of 2019, In particular, there was an unprecedented spike in March. [3]
  • SonicWall found that after the Coinhive shutdown, cryptojacking hits on its cybersecurity monitoring network fell by 78%. [3]
  • RaaS. Cybercriminals can hire others to launch attacks using the Cerber malware, and receive around 40 percent of the paid ransom. [3]
  • The many different Cerber ransomware variants were responsible for 33% of ransomware attacks in 2019. [3]
  • WatchGuard reported that in Q2 2021 91% of all detected malware were attacks of this nature. [3]
  • The security company found a 61 percent yearover year decrease in new malware variants between 2017 and 2018. [3]
  • For its part, WatchGuard reported that zero day malware accounted for over 50 percent of all malware blocked in Q3 2020, an increase of 14% year on year. [3]
  • Symantec noted a 12 percent increase in enterprise ransomware in 2018, for example, although it also recorded a 20 percent decline in ransomware overall that year. [3]
  • The company also identified a 33 percent rise in mobile ransomware, which highlights a new trend of criminals targeting mobile users with file. [3]
  • In fact, hackers were advertising access to the networks of major US service sector and industrial companies, with some buyers offering up to 30% commission on the proceeds of any hack performed. [3]
  • The company also identified 41% rise. [3]
  • In fact, hackers were advertising access to the networks of major US service sectors and industrial companies, with some buyers offering up to 30% commission on the proceeds of any hack performed. [3]
  • According to , the minimum price criminals charged for ransomware removal in the United States is $920,353,010 in 2021. [3]
  • Such attacks will likely increase in 2024, with all eyes on China, Russia, and North Korea. [3]
  • Experiments with seven tasks tested with 4 activation functions, ReLU, LeakyReLU, PReLU, and ELU separately demonstrate that PReLU gives the highest accuracy of more than 99.87% on all tasks. [4]
  • The results show that Malbert reaches a 99.9% detection rate on both datasets and a detection rate exceeding 98% under different robustness tests. [4]
  • Most Popular U.S. inflation rate surges to 6.6%, PCE index shows, but prices might also be peaking ‘So bad. [5]
  • According to the latest statistics, more than 17 million new malware instances are registered each month. [6]
  • The latest Google report cites that just 7% of tested websites are infected. [6]
  • However, sites that actually contain malware represent just 1.6% of this number; or around 50 per week. [6]
  • Routers have proved to be the most desirable targets for hackers, with 75% of all IoT malware infecting these devices. [6]
  • Its 47% malware infection rate is the highest globally, followed by Turkey with 42%, and Taiwan with 39%. [6]
  • Coming in second place and responsible for about 13% of total malware infections are viruses. [6]
  • Scripts were thirdranked in this 2019 survey by AV Test, accounting for approximately 9% of all malware infections worldwide. [6]
  • Recent computer virus stats show that 53% of viruses spread by .exe files, while .pdf is way behind in second place with just 6%. [6]
  • Executables are the most commonly infected email attachments, too, accounting for 21% of all infected files sent via email. [6]
  • According to the 2020 Data Breach Investigation Report by Verizon, malicious files include Word, Excel, and other formats. [6]
  • There was a 163% jump in cryptojacking attempts in 2020. [6]
  • While the exact scope of this attack was never revealed, analysts said it affected roughly 10% of all PCs around the world. [6]
  • AdWare alone accounts for 48% of all malware, while RiskTool infections account for 20%. [6]
  • Android is the mobile platform with the highest malware infection rate, accounting for 47.15% of all infected devices, while iOS accounts for under 1% of infections. [6]
  • According to research from 2019, these apps had accumulated more than 335 million downloads. [6]
  • Smartphone malware statistics from last year show that Turkey stands out as the most prominent target 1.2% of its mobile banking users have been affected by these Trojans. [6]
  • Ransomware attacks targeting corporations increased 20% from 2019 to 2020. [6]
  • 45% of organizations affected by ransomware attacks chose to pay the ransom, and half of them still lost their data. [6]
  • The country is often targeted by hackers; ransomware accounts for 9.57% of all malware infections in Thailand. [6]
  • The United Arab Emirates and Iran have a serious ransomware problem, too approximately 8.5% of malware infections in those countries are ransomware. [6]
  • According to Kaspersky, the situation improved significantly in 2020. [6]
  • In its malware statistics report, Kaspersky Lab found that 0.1% of monitored devices in the US were targeted by mobile ransomware in 2020, while 0.41% of Kazakhstan mobile users fell victim to ransomware. [6]
  • In the United States, 30% of computers are infected with some form of malware, which puts the US among the top 10 countries when it comes to the infection rate. [6]
  • The highest percentage of malware infections is in China (47%). [6]
  • China, Turkey, and Taiwan lead computer viruses statistics, with an infection rate of about 40% in each of these countries. [6]
  • In 2020, more than 30% of all mobile users in Iran found malware on their devices. [6]
  • Among these four measurements, the loyalty closeness estimation shows the best matching result, i.e., a rate of precision running from 95.0 to 99.9%, which is from 2 to 13 higher than that of the other three measurements. [0]
  • This device, named MOCDroid, accomplishes a precision of 95.15% in test with 1.69% of false positives with genuine applications extricated from the wild, overcoming all business antivirus motors from VirusTotal. [0]
  • For various estimating of malware tests, the expectation precision of malware discovery runs up to 98.7% with = 100. [0]
  • The general recognition precision of the SVC is more than 85% for unspecific versatile malware. [0]
  • The outcomes likewise show that the proposition identifies the Android malware superior to other neuro fuzzy frameworks as far as precision (90%). [0]
  • MaLabel accomplishes an exactness of 99.5% and review of 99.6% to confident relations demand, and more than 98% of accuracy and evaluation for unsupervised classification. [0]
  • DroidDetector can accomplish 96.76% detection accuracy, which traditional machine learning methods. [0]
  • In our investigations, the time cost for information mining is decreased by 32%, and the time cost for arrangement is decreased by 50%. [0]
  • According to the discussed and reviewed behavior based detection approaches, the comparison of the proposed articles has illustrated in Table 5. [0]
  • As shown, all of the accuracy factors higher than 80%. [0]
  • The maximum accuracy percentage is 99.2% for the DPIM approach [41] and the minimum accuracy percentage is 86% for the DMDAM approach [22]. [0]
  • As shown, the recent researches have considered android smartphones to analyze malware detection approaches with 40%. [0]
  • Also, Fig. 8 shows the data analysis methods percentage in terms of static, dynamic and hybrid analysis in selected research. [0]
  • The 30% of the signature based approaches have used the dynamic data analysis. [0]
  • The 65% of the behavior based malware detection approaches have used the dynamic data analysis method. [0]
  • In addition, the maximum accuracy percentage is 99.2% for the DPIM approach and the minimum accuracy percentage is 86% for the DMDAM approach. [0]
  • Also, we observed that the recent researches have considered android smartphones to analyze malware detection approaches with 40%. [0]
  • Finally, we have seen that The 30% of the signature based approaches have used the dynamic data analysis. [0]

I know you want to use Malware Analysis Tools, thus we made this list of best Malware Analysis Tools. We also wrote about how to learn Malware Analysis Tools and how to install Malware Analysis Tools. Recently we wrote how to uninstall Malware Analysis Tools for newbie users. Don’t forgot to check latest Malware Analysis Toolsstatistics of 2024.

Reference

  1. springeropen – https://hcis-journal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13673-018-0125-x.
  2. varonis – https://www.varonis.com/blog/ransomware-statistics-2021.
  3. acm – https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1599272.1599278.
  4. comparitech – https://www.comparitech.com/antivirus/malware-statistics-facts/.
  5. sciencedirect – https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404818303808.
  6. marketwatch – https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/2024-malware-analysis-tools-software-market-size-covid19-impact-with-new-business-challenges-growth-opportunities-demand-status-industry-size-share-top-trends-segmentation-outlook-by-2028-2024-04-19.
  7. dataprot – https://dataprot.net/statistics/malware-statistics/.

How Useful is Malware Analysis Tools

One of the key advantages of malware analysis tools is their ability to provide deep insights into the behavior and characteristics of malicious code. By dissecting the inner workings of malware samples, such tools enable security analysts to gain a better understanding of how threats operate and spread. This knowledge is invaluable for identifying potential vulnerabilities within an organization’s network and systems, allowing for proactive remediation and defense.

Furthermore, malware analysis tools can aid in the identification of indicators of compromise (IOCs) and patterns of malicious activity. By correlating data from multiple sources and analyzing the behavior of malware samples, these tools can help security teams to pinpoint anomalies and detect potential threats before they escalate. This early detection can be crucial in preventing data breaches and minimizing the impact of cyber attacks.

Moreover, the insights derived from malware analysis tools can be leveraged to enhance threat intelligence sharing and collaboration within the cybersecurity community. By sharing IOCs and analysis results with industry peers and collaborators, organizations can collectively build a more comprehensive understanding of emerging threats and trends. This collaborative approach strengthens the overall cybersecurity ecosystem and empowers organizations to mount a more effective defense against cyber threats.

In addition to aiding in threat detection and analysis, malware analysis tools also play a crucial role in incident response and mitigation. By enabling security teams to quickly identify and analyze malware samples, these tools can help organizations to contain and remediate threats in a timely manner. This swift response is essential for minimizing the impact of cyber attacks and restoring the integrity of affected systems.

Furthermore, malware analysis tools can automate the process of malware analysis, making it more efficient and scalable for organizations with limited resources. By automating repetitive tasks and streamlining analysis workflows, these tools can help security teams to focus their efforts on higher-value tasks and strategic initiatives. This increased efficiency can result in faster detection and response times, ultimately enhancing an organization’s overall cybersecurity resilience.

In conclusion, malware analysis tools are a critical resource for organizations seeking to protect their data, systems, and assets from cyber threats. By providing deep insights into the behavior of malicious software, aiding in threat detection and analysis, facilitating threat intelligence sharing, and enabling swift incident response, these tools play a vital role in strengthening cybersecurity defenses. As the threat landscape continues to evolve, organizations must recognize the value of investing in and leveraging malware analysis tools to stay ahead of adversaries and safeguard against potential risks.

In Conclusion

Be it Malware Analysis Tools benefits statistics, Malware Analysis Tools usage statistics, Malware Analysis Tools productivity statistics, Malware Analysis Tools adoption statistics, Malware Analysis Tools roi statistics, Malware Analysis Tools market statistics, statistics on use of Malware Analysis Tools, Malware Analysis Tools analytics statistics, statistics of companies that use Malware Analysis Tools, statistics small businesses using Malware Analysis Tools, top Malware Analysis Tools systems usa statistics, Malware Analysis Tools software market statistics, statistics dissatisfied with Malware Analysis Tools, statistics of businesses using Malware Analysis Tools, Malware Analysis Tools key statistics, Malware Analysis Tools systems statistics, nonprofit Malware Analysis Tools statistics, Malware Analysis Tools failure statistics, top Malware Analysis Tools statistics, best Malware Analysis Tools statistics, Malware Analysis Tools statistics small business, Malware Analysis Tools statistics 2024, Malware Analysis Tools statistics 2021, Malware Analysis Tools statistics 2024 you will find all from this page. 🙂

We tried our best to provide all the Malware Analysis Tools statistics on this page. Please comment below and share your opinion if we missed any Malware Analysis Tools statistics.




Leave a Comment