Network Access Control Statistics 2024 – Everything You Need to Know

Are you looking to add Network Access Control to your arsenal of tools? Maybe for your business or personal use only, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to know more about the most important Network Access Control statistics of 2024.

My team and I scanned the entire web and collected all the most useful Network Access Control stats on this page. You don’t need to check any other resource on the web for any Network Access Control statistics. All are here only 🙂

How much of an impact will Network Access Control have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your business? Should you invest in Network Access Control? We will answer all your Network Access Control related questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any word. 🙂

Best Network Access Control Statistics

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 135 Network Access Control Statistics on this page 🙂

Network Access Control Benefits Statistics

  • “I am obviously biased in my response, but I continue to believe that cloud, and its derivative benefits, will most likely have the greatest impact on the physical access control domain in 2020,” says Denis Hebert, president, Feenics Inc., Ottawa, Ontario. [0]

Network Access Control Market Statistics

  • The integration services segment is expected to remain the leading services segment over the next seven years, which accounted for over 47% of the overall market in 2014. [1]
  • In SDM’s 2019 Industry Forecast Study, nearly three fourths of respondents described the home control/home entertainment market as good to excellent. [0]
  • While this was down 6 percentage points overall from the previous year, the number of respondents characterizing the market as “very good/excellent” was up 8 percentage points, to nearly 40 percent. [0]
  • What’s more, 45 percent expect the revenue from this market to increase this year, in 2019. [0]
  • “We originally forecast the access control equipment market would grow well, about 6 percent in 2019,” says research analyst Bryan Montany. [0]
  • Looking at the American market, if we are thinking a 6 percent growth in 2019 it is close to 12 percent for access controlasa service, but from a much lower size. [0]
  • It is still under 20 percent of the traditional market.”. [0]
  • SDM’s Industry Forecast points to similar growth in the ACaaS market, with 66 percent of respondents indicating they currently offer the service, up 10 percentage points from the previous year. [0]
  • One forecaster predicts that “Contactless biometric technology will ride the wave created by the Covid19 pandemic to a CAGR of 17.4% from 2020 to 2030, with the global market increasing five fold to reach $70 billion. [2]
  • According to securityworldmarket.com, “Time frames can be specified before and after a COVID 19 positive individual entered an area. [2]

Network Access Control Software Statistics

  • The software segment accounted for 42% of the overall revenue in 2014 and is expected to reach 45%by 2024. [1]

Network Access Control Latest Statistics

  • The hardware segment accounted for 58% of the overall revenue in 2014 and is expected to remain the leading solution vertical throughout the forecast period. [1]
  • The BFSI sector is expected to remain the leading end user vertical over the next seven years, which accounted for over 29% of the overall revenue in 2014. [1]
  • 61% of all breaches involve credentials, whether they be stolen via social engineering or hacked using brute force. [3]
  • A Work in Progress, 94% of organizations have experienced a data breach, and 79% were breached in the last two years. [3]
  • 60% of mid sized businesses that have asked their employees to work remotely experienced a cyberattack; 56% of those experienced credential theft, and 48% experienced social engineering, such as phishing. [3]
  • 99% of IDSA’s respondents who’d suffered an identity related breach believe that these types of attack are preventable. [3]
  • Further research shows that 44% of security professionals believe that an identity and access management solution will address their current security gaps. [3]
  • According to a recent survey, 8 out of 10 of us find password management difficult. [3]
  • 22% of hacking breaches involve social attacks, and 37% of all breaches involve the use of stolen credentials…. [3]
  • 24% of US security professionals say that their organization has experienced a brute force attack, including password spraying or credential stuffing, in the last two years. [3]
  • According to the same study, 66% have experienced a phishing attack – which brings us on to our next identity breach method, which is generally considered to be the most common. [3]
  • 25% of all data breaches involve phishing, a type of social engineering attack. [3]
  • Trickbot reports were at a high during the first half of 2020, with 47% of reported incidents globally taking place in Q1 as hackers capitalized on the uncertainly brought about by the pandemic. [3]
  • Q4 saw the highest number of Agent Tesla reports globally, at 46%. [3]
  • Similarly, Q4 accounted for 68% of the global reports of Dridex, a financial trojan that can steal credentials, take screenshots of compromised devices, and perform distributed denial of service attacks. [3]
  • Remote working has increased access to critical business systems by 59% in the last year. [3]
  • On average, organizations today have 51 business critical applications; over half of these (56%). [3]
  • Despite the risks presented by remote and hybrid work, a concerning 50% of organizations don’t have a policy on the security requirements for their remote workers. [3]
  • 73% of workers haven’t received any cybersecurity awareness training from their employer since they began working from home. [3]
  • Of those that do require that their employees use authentication, only 35% require multi. [3]
  • Only 38% of organizations use MFA to secure their privileged accounts, and 49% of organizations have at least some users with more access privileges than are required for them to do their job. [3]
  • It comes as little surprise, then, that a quarter of all cybercrime victims in the US and UK have managerial positions or own a business and that 34% of identity related breaches in the last two years have involved the compromise of privileged user accounts. [3]
  • Lack of skilled staff (41%) Not utilizing available technologies (33%) Password management and authentication (31%) Detection and/or mitigation of insider threats (30%). [3]
  • Increasing use of mobile devices (30%). [3]
  • In 2020, 80% of organizations that reported a data breach suffered a loss of PII. [3]
  • Further research, focused on data breaches in the era of remote work, has also found that customer records are considered the most vulnerable type of data, with 55% of organizations showing concern for protecting customer records from cyberattacks. [3]
  • This was followed by financial information (48%), customer credit or debit card information (31%), intellectual property (28%), employee records (21%) and business correspondence (18%). [3]
  • According to a survey by Cybersecurity Insiders, when looking to invest in an IAM solution, organizations prioritize ease of integration (72%), followed by end user experience (62%), and product performance and effectiveness (61%). [3]
  • Further features that security teams look for include Ease of administration (59%). [3]
  • by the end of March 2020, 73% of organizations had given their employees extra training on how to be “cyber safe” when working remotely, with specific training targeting password and credential verification. [3]
  • 91% of organizations say that password MFA is important in order to stop credential theft and phishing attacks, making attack prevention the primary reason that people use passwordless MFA. [3]
  • Interestingly, this is followed by user experience, which 64% of organizations named as being a reason that passwordless MFA is important. [3]
  • Other reasons given for the importance of passwordless MFA include achieving digital transformation (21%) and saving costs (14%). [3]
  • In the past year, only 34% of organizations with a “forwardthinking” security culture have had an identity related breach in the past year. [3]
  • 71% of organizations that have suffered a data breach in the past year say that better security awareness training for users could have prevented the breach. [3]
  • Take steps to become proactive in your security implementation, rather than reactive like that 71%. [3]
  • While he stresses that the dip is slight — 1 percent or less — he points to the trade war between the U.S. and China as a chief reason. [0]
  • And 65 percent expected revenue in the access control space to increase in 2020. [0]
  • “In 2019 access control was close to 50 percent of our revenue,” says Angie Wong, president, Ojo Technology Inc., Freemont,. [0]
  • Hunter Thornton, vice president of sales, A3 Communications Inc., Irmo, S.C., reports that his company saw close to 40 percent growth in 2019. [0]
  • Security makes up 70 75 percent of our revenue. [0]
  • “Our company started off the year flat, but ended 40 percent up,” he says. [0]
  • “We increased booked revenues by 30 percent over 2018 and added 700 plus hosted card access controlled doors …. [0]
  • We are projecting 2020 revenues to increase by nearly the same percentage. [0]
  • Calif. “We saw an expected growth … up yearover year 10 percent …. [0]
  • “Last year about 10 percent of our sales were RMR. [0]
  • This year our goal is to be around 30 percent in RMR. [0]
  • “Our RMR is actually up greater than 30 percent yearover. [0]
  • The average per record cost of a data breach increased by 10.3 percent from 2020 to 2021. [4]
  • The average total cost for healthcare increased from $7.13 million in 2020 to $9.23 million in 2021, a 29.5 percent increase. [4]
  • 39 percent of costs are incurred more than a year after a data breach. [4]
  • Annually, hospitals spend 64 percent more on advertising the two years following a breach. [4]
  • 34 percent of data breaches in 2018 involved internal actors. [4]
  • 71 percent of breaches are financially motivated. [4]
  • Ransomware accounts for nearly 24 percent of incidents in which malware is used. [4]
  • 95 percent of breached records came from the government, retail and technology sectors in 2016. [4]
  • 36 percent of external data breach actors in 2019 were involved in organized crime. [4]
  • Microsoft Office files accounted for 48 percent of malicious email attachments. [4]
  • The global number of web attacks blocked per day increased by 56.1 percent between 2017 and 2018. [4]
  • There was an 80 percent increase in the number of people affected by health data breaches from 2017 to 2019. [4]
  • Organizations with more than 60 percent of employees working remotely had a higher average data breach cost than those without remote workers. [4]
  • Estimates show there were as many as 192,000 coronavirus related cyberattacks per week in May 2020 alone, a 30 percent increase compared to April 2020. [4]
  • In 2021, 98 percent of pointof sale data breaches in the hospitality industry were financially motivated. [4]
  • Confirmed data breaches in the healthcare industry increased by 58 percent this year. [4]
  • Web application breaches account for 43 percent of all breaches and have doubled since 2019. [4]
  • Cyber scams increased by 400 percent in the month of March 2020, making COVID19 the largest ever security threat. [4]
  • The average distributed denial of service attack grew to more than 26 Gbps, increasing in size by 500 percent. [4]
  • In the first quarter of 2020, DDoS attacks rose more than 278 percent compared to Q1 2019, and more than 542 percent compared to the last quarter. [4]
  • More than 64 percent of financial service companies have 1,000 plus sensitive files accessible to every employee in 2021. [4]
  • On average in 2021, 70 percent of all sensitive data was considered stale. [4]
  • 58 percent of companies found more than 1,000 folders that had inconsistent permissions. [4]
  • 59 percent of financial services companies have more than 500 passwords that never expire, and nearly 40 percent have more than 10,000 ghost users. [4]
  • Small businesses account for 28 percent of data breach victims. [4]
  • More than 80 percent of breaches within hacking involve brute force or the use of lost or stolen credentials. [4]
  • Human error causes 23 percent of data breaches. [4]
  • 62 percent of breaches not involving an error, misuse or physical action involved the use of stolen credentials, brute force or phishing. [4]
  • By 2025, cybercrime is estimated to cost $10.5 trillion globally, increasing by 15 percent year over year. [4]
  • As of 2015, 25 percent of global data required security but was not protected. [4]
  • Social media data breaches accounted for 56 percent of data breaches in the first half of 2018. [4]
  • 63 percent of companies have implemented a biometric system or plan to implement one. [4]
  • 17 percent of IT security professionals reported information security as the largest budget increase for 2018. [4]
  • 80 percent of organizations intended to increase security spending for 2018. [4]
  • It was predicted that global cybersecurity spending would exceed $1 trillion cumulatively between 2017 to 2021. [4]
  • Worldwide, IT security spending in 2019 was projected to grow 8.7 percent compared to 2018. [4]
  • For the first time since 2013, ransomware declined 20 percent overall but was up by 12 percent for enterprise companies. [4]
  • Budget allocation to hardware based security services, which generally lack both portability and the ability to effectively function in virtual infrastructure, has fallen from 20 percent in 2015 to 17 percent. [4]
  • MSSPs, which can replicate certain security operational functions, saw modest budget allocation growth at the end of 2017 to 14.7 percent, but security professionals expected that stake would grow to 17.3 percent by 2021. [4]
  • According to the Office of Inadequate Security, in 1984 the global credit information corporation known as TRW was hacked and 90 million records were stolen. [4]
  • The Privacy Rights Clearinghouse estimated that there have been 9,044 public breaches since 2005, however more can be presumed since the organization does not report on breaches where the number of compromised records is unknown. [4]
  • A 2019 survey of 473 security directors, managers, and consultants conducted by HID Global and Security Management magazine identified the top access control concerns at that time Integration with legacy systems (45%). [2]
  • Taking advantage of features in new technologies (39%) Protection against increasing vulnerabilities (38%). [2]
  • User convenience and throughput at entrances (36%). [2]
  • The acceptance of analytics, behavior and related biometric modalities … have all played a role in the 50% increase in this sector’s valuation since December 2015. [2]
  • 44% of office workers note that the pandemic has made access control an even more important issue. [2]
  • In 2019, a survey by HID estimated that 54% of businesses have upgraded or will upgrade to a mobile access control system in the next 3 years. [2]
  • Research firm IHS Markit has reported that mobile based credentials are the fastest growing access control product, up about 150% in growth rate between 2017 and 2018. [2]
  • 93% of the entire U.S. population uses a smartphone, most of which have their device on their person all the time. [2]
  • In fact, it has been estimated that by the end of the year, 40% of the data on the Internet of Things will be stored, processed, examined and applied near to or at the edge of the network. [2]
  • Gartner predicted that 50% of enterprises using mobile authentication would adopt it as their primary verification method by the end of 2019. [2]
  • In fact, 36% of access control installations in educational settings now include video or intrusion detection systems. [2]
  • In fact, a 2019 study by the ASIS Foundation shows that only 24% of companies in the United States, Europe, and India have converged physical and cyber security, and there is scant evidence that the number is increasing. [2]
  • The HID/ASIS report adds that while security directors report that they work with IT departments to establish security best practices for their facilities (61%) and to look for new technologies cooperatively (55%). [2]
  • 20% report that there is little or no overlap between physical security and IT. [2]
  • Asked in the HID/ASIS survey to rate the level of authority on decisions to upgrade physical access control solutions 46% said IT was fully consulted and another 22% said IT was involved in either the final recommendation or the final decision. [2]
  • 10% said IT had no influence. [2]
  • For 28% of respondents, “Integrated physical and logical access control” was selected as the top technology advancement that would have the most impact on improving the organization’s overall access control system. [2]
  • What we will find is that Direct Access is Still Very CommonDirect access to compute instances is still very common (35 85%+ of public workloads depending upon cloud provider environment). [5]
  • Unsurprisingly, SSH is the most common due to the popularity of Linux workloads, followed by RDP, then VNC.35% up to 85%. [5]
  • In AWS, out of 6,597 public EC2 instances, 16% allowed inbound traffic to All Ports, 36% to SSH, 8% to RDP, 1% to VNC. [5]
  • In GCP, out of 5,675 public compute instances, 55% allowed inbound traffic to All Ports, 88% to SSH, 85% to RDP, and 1% to VNC. [5]
  • In Azure, out of 15,432 public compute instances, 53% allowed inbound traffic to SSH. [5]
  • In addition, allowing traffic to all All Destination Ports is commonly found in AWS (16%) and GCP (55%). [5]
  • In AWS, out of 1,054 public compute instances allowing All Destination Ports, more than 15% of these can be scanned/attacked from any public IP address. [5]
  • For those instances allowing SSH, more than 36% are reachable from any public IP address. [5]
  • And for RDP, more than 30% of the compute instances are reachable from any public IP address. [5]
  • In GCP, similarly, more than 44% of the compute instances have rules allowing inbound traffic from any public Internet address to All Destination Ports. [5]
  • Instances allowing SSH are minimally exposed to the whole Internet (only .5%). [5]
  • But for those instances allowing RDP, more than 50% are reachable from any Internet address. [5]
  • All Destination Ports, RDP and VNC were tightly restricted, and out of the 8,128 instances allowing SSH and the one instance allowing RDP, all (100%). [5]
  • This ranges from more than 40% of public instances in AWS, 50% in Azure, and more than 85% in GCP that allow this traffic. [5]
  • In AWS, 16% of the public compute instances have All Destination Ports open to inbound traffic from the Internet, and in GCP, more than 55% expose All Ports as well. [5]
  • In AWS, 15% up to 36% of the public compute instances expose All Ports, SSH, or RDP to the entire Internet. [5]
  • in GCP, 44% to 51% expose All Ports or RDP similarly. [5]

I know you want to use Network Access Control Software, thus we made this list of best Network Access Control Software. We also wrote about how to learn Network Access Control Software and how to install Network Access Control Software. Recently we wrote how to uninstall Network Access Control Software for newbie users. Don’t forgot to check latest Network Access Control statistics of 2024.

Reference


  1. sdmmag – https://www.sdmmag.com/articles/97777-state-of-the-market-2020-access-control.
  2. grandviewresearch – https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/network-access-control-market.
  3. swiftlane – https://www.swiftlane.com/blog/the-future-of-access-control/.
  4. expertinsights – https://expertinsights.com/insights/50-identity-and-access-security-stats-you-should-know/.
  5. varonis – https://www.varonis.com/blog/data-breach-statistics.
  6. netskope – https://www.netskope.com/blog/its-all-about-access-remote-access-statistics-for-public-cloud-workloads.

How Useful is Network Access Control

One of the key benefits of NAC is its ability to enforce access policies across an organization’s network. By controlling who can access the network and what resources they can access, NAC helps prevent unauthorized users from gaining entry and reduces the risk of security breaches. This level of control is essential in today’s environment where data privacy and protection are paramount.

Furthermore, NAC can also help organizations ensure compliance with industry regulations and internal security policies. By automatically auditing devices for software vulnerabilities, patch levels, and antivirus status, NAC solutions enable organizations to maintain a secure and compliant network environment. This not only helps protect sensitive data but also helps avoid potential fines and reputational damage.

Moreover, NAC provides organizations with visibility into the devices connecting to their network. By identifying and profiling connected devices, organizations can better understand the security posture of their network and respond quickly to potential threats. This insight is critical for effectively managing risks and mitigating security incidents before they escalate.

Another significant advantage of Network Access Control is its role in supporting secure BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) initiatives. With the proliferation of mobile devices and remote work, organizations need to adapt their security strategies to accommodate personal devices without compromising security. NAC solutions can authenticate and assess the security posture of devices accessing the network, ensuring that only compliant devices are granted access.

However, despite its many benefits, implementing NAC solutions can be challenging. Setting up and configuring NAC policies can be complex, requiring organizations to invest time and resources in planning and implementation. Additionally, ensuring seamless integration with existing network infrastructure and security tools can pose technical hurdles for some organizations.

Moreover, NAC solutions may not be foolproof. Advanced threats such as zero-day attacks and insider threats can potentially bypass NAC controls, highlighting the need for a multi-layered security approach. While NAC helps bolster network security, organizations must also invest in other security measures such as endpoint protection, threat detection, and response mechanisms to effectively combat evolving cyber threats.

In conclusion, Network Access Control is undeniably useful in securing network infrastructure and mitigating security risks. Its ability to enforce access policies, ensure compliance, and provide visibility into network activity makes it a valuable component of a comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. However, organizations must carefully consider the complexities and limitations of NAC solutions and complement them with other security measures to build a robust defense against modern cyber threats.

In Conclusion

Be it Network Access Control benefits statistics, Network Access Control usage statistics, Network Access Control productivity statistics, Network Access Control adoption statistics, Network Access Control roi statistics, Network Access Control market statistics, statistics on use of Network Access Control, Network Access Control analytics statistics, statistics of companies that use Network Access Control, statistics small businesses using Network Access Control, top Network Access Control systems usa statistics, Network Access Control software market statistics, statistics dissatisfied with Network Access Control, statistics of businesses using Network Access Control, Network Access Control key statistics, Network Access Control systems statistics, nonprofit Network Access Control statistics, Network Access Control failure statistics, top Network Access Control statistics, best Network Access Control statistics, Network Access Control statistics small business, Network Access Control statistics 2024, Network Access Control statistics 2021, Network Access Control statistics 2024 you will find all from this page. 🙂

We tried our best to provide all the Network Access Control statistics on this page. Please comment below and share your opinion if we missed any Network Access Control statistics.




Leave a Comment