Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment Statistics 2024 – Everything You Need to Know

Are you looking to add Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment to your arsenal of tools? Maybe for your business or personal use only, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to know more about the most important Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment statistics of 2024.

My team and I scanned the entire web and collected all the most useful Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment stats on this page. You don’t need to check any other resource on the web for any Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment statistics. All are here only 🙂

How much of an impact will Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your business? Should you invest in Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment? We will answer all your Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment related questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any word. 🙂

Best Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment Statistics

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 81 Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment Statistics on this page 🙂

Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment Software Statistics

  • Autistic teams undertaking softwaretesting roles in an Australian Federal Government Department demonstrated 30% higher productivity over Neurodiversity. [0]

Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment Latest Statistics

  • The incidence of autism in the United States is now 1 in 42 among boys and 1 in 189 among girls, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [1]
  • Unemployment runs as high as 80%. [1]
  • Preliminary results suggest that the organization’s neurodiverse testing teams are 30% more productive than the others. [1]
  • For example, the European Union faces a shortage of 800,000 IT workers by 2020, according to a European Commission study. [1]
  • SAP has announced an intention to make 1% of its workforce neurodiverse by 2020—a number chosen because it roughly corresponds to the percentage of autistic people in the general population. [1]
  • Both SAP and HPE report examples of neurodiverse employees’ participating on teams that generated significant innovations. [1]
  • 5% of the population have ADHD. [2]
  • 1 2% of the population is autistic. [2]
  • 10% of the population are dyslexic 5% of the population are. [2]
  • dyspraxic 1 2% of the population have Tourette Syndrome. [2]
  • 7 % of the population have mental health needs 5% of the population have an acquired brain injury. [2]
  • According to the National Center for Learning Disabilities 2017 report, 1 in 5 children experience significant issues with learning due to underlying cognitive differences. [3]
  • The National Center for Education Statistics reports that 13% of all students in school have an Individualized Education Plan meaning that the base curriculum must be significantly modified to meet their needs. [3]
  • For example, a higher than expected percentage of successful entrepreneurs have a diagnosis of dyslexia. [3]
  • Highlighting should be done conservatively and should generally not exceed 20% of the content. [3]
  • In a study in the US in 2016, amongst children aged 8, prevalence of autism was estimated at 1 in 54. [0]
  • The prevalence was 1 in 34 for boys and 1 in 145 for girls so boys were 4.3 times more likely than girls to be diagnosed as autistic. [0]
  • Studies in Asia, Europe, and North America have identified average prevalence of between 1% and 2%. [0]
  • There are 205,200 autistic Australians with males 3.5 times more likely to be autistic than females and prevalence rates of 1.3% and 0.4% respectively. [0]
  • Of the 106,600 autistic young Australians who were attending school or another educational institution, 78% reported experiencing difficulty at their place of learning. [0]
  • Of those experiencing difficulties, the main problems encountered were fitting in socially (60%), learning difficulties (55%) and communication difficulties (51%). [0]
  • In 2018, Autism Spectrum Australia estimated that about 1 in 70 people in Australia were autistic or about 353,880 people but only 40% were employed. [0]
  • As at March 2018, 29% of active participants in the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme were autistic. [0]
  • https//www.autismspectrum.org.au/news/autismprevalencerateupbyanestimated40to1in70people1107 2018, NDIS “Outcomes for participants with Autism Spectrum Disorder ”. [0]
  • 50% of NASA employees are dyslexic hyper focused higher levels of creativity and curiosity, innovation and inventiveness. [0]
  • The backlog was assessed as likely to take 18 months to clear. [0]
  • Their initial cohort of nine trainees were proficient four months earlier than expected, returning 12 months’ value in five months and delivered an over 50% increase in productivity. [0]
  • A team at an Australian Bank – dealing with access requests – were 26% more productive that neurotypical team within 2 months of commencement. [0]
  • A program implemented by JPMorganChase in the US demonstrated 48% higher productivity from a neurodiverse team when compared to a “neurotypical” team. [0]
  • After three to six months working in one area of the bank, autistic workers were doing the work of people who took three years to ramp up – and were even more than 50% more productive. [0]
  • In March 2014, the Wall Street Journal reported that 85% of autistic people in the US are unemployed or underemployed and 60% of them have cognitive abilities at or above those of neurotypical people. [0]
  • A United Nations proclamation on World Autism Day 2016 estimated that more than 80% of autistic adults around the world are unemployed. [0]
  • In Australia, the unemployment rate for autistic people is 31.6 per cent. [0]
  • Among depressed participants, a dose response relationship was found between sunlight exposure and cognitive function, with lower levels of sunlight associated with impaired cognitive status (odds ratio = 2.58; 95% CI 1.43–6.69). [4]
  • Within each region the planned recruitment included half white and half AfricanAmericans . [4]
  • Planned recruitment within each race region strata was half male and half female (actual total recruitment 45% male, 55% female). [4]
  • Information obtained from SAS/GIS with 80% accuracy or greater was utilized. [4]
  • For those with a SAS/GIS accuracy of 80% or greater, the difference between the latitudes given between the two programs had a mean of 0.23 kilometers and a maximum of 0.95 kilometers. [4]
  • 2002 validated the screener in both a community based population of 344 black adults aged 65 or older and a population of 651 subjects who were referred to the Alzheimer’s disease Center (16% black). [4]
  • Results from the communitybased sample found that for a six item screener score of 4 or fewer, using clinically confirmed cognitive impairment as the gold standard, the sensitivity was 74% and specificity was 80% [10]. [4]
  • Of these, 3,020 patients with poor geocoding (less than 80% accuracy). [4]
  • For any significant interactions the predicted probabilities and odds ratios of cognitive impairment with their 95% confidence intervals were calculated. [4]
  • Missing Intact Cognitive Status (N = 15421; 92%) Impaired Cognitive Status (N = 1379; 8%). [4]
  • Participants in the lowest category of insolation compared to those in the highest insolation category had 1.36 times (95% CI = 1.08–1.70). [4]
  • When this measure of insolation was modeled as an ordinal variable, each successively lower insolation level compared to the adjacent higher insolation level had 1.06 (95% CI 1.02–1.11). [4]
  • Depressed participants showed an increased odds of cognitive impairment (OR = 1.90; 95% CI 1.65–2.20). [4]
  • In addition, univariate analyses showed that the seasons of winter (OR = 1.64; 95% CI 1.42–1.90) and spring (OR = 1.46; 95% CI 1.26–1.69). [4]
  • Figure Figure11 shows that the predicted probabilities of cognitive impairment for depressed participants are consistently higher than the predicted probabilities of impairment for non. [4]
  • Figure Figure11 also shows that depressed participants receiving less than 10,000 KJ/m2/day of sunlight exposure compared to depressed participants in other solar exposure categories had a significantly higher predicted probability of cognitive impairment. [4]
  • Both spring (OR = 1.20; 95% CI 1.01–1.42) and winter (OR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.07–1.67). [4]
  • The relationships between sunlight exposure, depression, and cognitive impairment were unchanged when season was added to the model, giving identical predicted probabilities as in Figure Figure11. [4]
  • Due to the exclusion of a considerable proportion (27%). [4]
  • While sex, education, region, alcohol, age, and depression status of the excluded subjects were statistically different, the proportions of these variables all differed by eight percentage points or less .4). [4]
  • Covariates with larger differences (over 2%). [4]
  • In a normal distribution, 68% of the population will score somewhere between 85 and 115. [5]
  • About 16% of people will score below 85, and about 16% of people above 115. [5]
  • Each strategy has a feedback survey afterwards, and from 173,882 learner responses, we have found that 89% would apply the skill they learned to their work and study and 98% of the same number found their strategy useful. [5]
  • We’ve helped many clients increase learner attainment, like Bradford College, who increased LDD learner attainment by 10% in the NARTs in one year. [5]
  • Some of our clients have achieved 100% achievement, so there is huge possibility for your learners to succeed and unlock their learning potential. [5]
  • Strengths associated with neurodivergence are beneficial, and cognitive diversity can make groups perform better, according to research such as a 2019 study by Ishani Aggarwal and colleagues, published in Frontiers in Psychology. [6]
  • In 2019–20, 14 percent of public school students ages. [6]
  • About 9 percent of US children have been diagnosed with ADHD, 8 to 10 percent with a learning disability, and 2 percent with autism, according to federal statistics. [6]
  • Findings from extant entrepreneurship research indicates that individuals with ADHD are more likely to self select new business venturing because entrepreneurial environments are attractive to individuals with ADHD. [7]
  • According to Allinson and Hayes , intuitive people tend to take a broad perspective on a problem to get an overall feel for it and reach a conclusion rapidly. [7]
  • According to Gaglio and Katz , entrepreneurial alertness is a schema that enables people to organize and interpret information in various domains of knowledge related to the development of new opportunities. [7]
  • Of the 6,667 invitations that were sent, approximately 9% responded. [7]
  • From the 250 who responded “yes” to the ADHD screening question, approximately 21% actually met criteria for a clinical diagnosis of ADHD. [7]
  • Although the incidence of ADHD in our sample is higher than that in the adult population, higher incident rates of ADHD in entrepreneur populations of approximately 25% are demonstrated in prior research by and Dimic and Orlov. [7]
  • Our sample of entrepreneurs consisted of a variety of age groups with similar frequencies across age groups (34.9% ages 20–30, 33.6% ages 31–40, and 31.5% over the age of 40). [7]
  • In terms of gender, 355 respondents (61.1 %) were male and 226 (38.9%). [7]
  • While a majority of our sample consisted of Caucasians (69.7% of respondents), a significant number of other races were represented (28.6% nonCaucasian races). [7]
  • Although most of the respondents were married (53.4%). [7]
  • Our sample consisted of a diverse set of educational experiences, including those with a bachelor’s degree (32.9%), post graduate degree (16.2%), some higher education or associate’s degree (34.3%), or high school degree (15.7%). [7]
  • In terms of entrepreneurial or business experience, 68.8% of our respondents had started one business, 24.6% had started two businesses, and 6.5% had started three or more businesses. [7]
  • Finally, respondents included entrepreneurs with the following periods of time for entrepreneurial experience 34.1% less than 1 year, 46.6% one to 3 years, 13.9% three to 6 years, and 5.3% seven to ten years. [7]
  • According to a report published in 2012, ASD affects approximately 1 in every 88 individuals in the United States, and is considered to be congenital, lifelong, and extremely heritable. [8]
  • Accumulated evidence suggests that “as many as 300 to 500 distinct genes are involved in the etiology, with no single locus accounting for more than 1% of cases”. [8]
  • × 4 analysis of variance. [8]
  • according to DSM 5 while the participants included in the other two groups were TD children). [8]
  • This baseline assessment will also help determine whether the patient is at risk of secondary medical problems and which primary and secondary prevention strategies, accommodations, and adaptive equipment are most likely to be beneficial. [9]

I know you want to use Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment Software, thus we made this list of best Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment Software. We also wrote about how to learn Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment Software and how to install Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment Software. Recently we wrote how to uninstall Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment Software for newbie users. Don’t forgot to check latest Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment statistics of 2024.

Reference


  1. neurodiversityhub – https://www.neurodiversityhub.org/what-is-neurodiversity.
  2. hbr – https://hbr.org/2017/05/neurodiversity-as-a-competitive-advantage.
  3. geniuswithin – https://www.geniuswithin.org/what-is-neurodiversity/.
  4. mtholyoke – https://commons.mtholyoke.edu/theaccessibletoolbox/teaching-strategies-student-perspectives/working-with-neurodiverse-students/supporting-successful-statistics-learning-for-neurodiverse-students/.
  5. nih – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2728098/.
  6. cognassist – https://cognassist.com/insights-hub/science-behind-cognassist/.
  7. aacu – https://www.aacu.org/article/neurodiversity-is-diversity.
  8. sagepub – https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1042258719890986.
  9. nih – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6305364/.
  10. aafp – https://www.aafp.org/afp/2018/0515/p649.html.

How Useful is Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment

One of the key strengths of neurodiversity cognitive assessment is its recognition of the diverse ways in which people think, learn, and process information. Traditional cognitive assessments often fail to capture the full range of cognitive abilities present in neurodiverse individuals, leading to misdiagnosis or underestimation of their true potential. By taking into account factors such as sensory processing differences, atypical social interaction styles, and unusual patterns of attention and focus, neurodiversity cognitive assessment offers a more comprehensive view of an individual’s cognitive profile, allowing for personalized interventions and accommodations that better meet their needs.

Furthermore, neurodiversity cognitive assessment can also help to challenge and disrupt common stereotypes and misconceptions about neurodiverse conditions. By highlighting the unique strengths and abilities that individuals with neurodiverse traits possess, such as exceptional attention to detail, creativity, and divergent thinking, this form of assessment promotes a more inclusive and positive view of neurodiversity. Rather than focusing solely on deficits and limitations, neurodiversity cognitive assessment encourages a strengths-based approach that values and celebrates the diversity of human cognition.

In addition, neurodiversity cognitive assessment can play a crucial role in enhancing the well-being and quality of life of neurodiverse individuals. By providing a more accurate and nuanced understanding of their cognitive abilities, this form of assessment can inform the development of targeted interventions and support strategies that are tailored to their specific needs and preferences. For example, identifying specific sensory sensitivities or attentional issues in an individual with autism can help to design a learning environment that minimizes distractions and maximizes focus, leading to improved outcomes and greater satisfaction.

Overall, neurodiversity cognitive assessment holds great promise as a valuable tool for promoting the inclusion, understanding, and support of individuals with neurodiverse conditions. By recognizing and valuing the diverse ways in which people think and learn, this form of assessment has the potential to transform our understanding of neurodiversity and pave the way for more personalized and effective interventions and accommodations. As we continue to strive for a more inclusive and supportive society, neurodiversity cognitive assessment offers a powerful framework for embracing and celebrating the unique cognitive abilities of all individuals, regardless of their neurodiverse traits.

In Conclusion

Be it Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment benefits statistics, Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment usage statistics, Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment productivity statistics, Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment adoption statistics, Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment roi statistics, Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment market statistics, statistics on use of Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment, Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment analytics statistics, statistics of companies that use Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment, statistics small businesses using Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment, top Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment systems usa statistics, Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment software market statistics, statistics dissatisfied with Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment, statistics of businesses using Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment, Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment key statistics, Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment systems statistics, nonprofit Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment statistics, Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment failure statistics, top Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment statistics, best Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment statistics, Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment statistics small business, Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment statistics 2024, Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment statistics 2021, Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment statistics 2024 you will find all from this page. 🙂

We tried our best to provide all the Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment statistics on this page. Please comment below and share your opinion if we missed any Neurodiversity Cognitive Assessment statistics.

Leave a Comment