Are you looking to add Photogrammetry to your arsenal of tools? Maybe for your business or personal use only, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to know more about the most important Photogrammetry statistics of 2024.
My team and I scanned the entire web and collected all the most useful Photogrammetry stats on this page. You don’t need to check any other resource on the web for any Photogrammetry statistics. All are here only 🙂
How much of an impact will Photogrammetry have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your business? Should you invest in Photogrammetry? We will answer all your Photogrammetry related questions here.
Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any word. 🙂
On this page, you’ll learn about the following:
Best Photogrammetry Statistics
☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 31 Photogrammetry Statistics on this page 🙂Photogrammetry Latest Statistics
- Employment of cartographers and photogrammetrists is projected to grow 5 percent from 2020 to 2030, slower than the average for all occupations. [0]
- In the SfM the camera positions are estimated by matching similar features in pairs of images requiring 60% to 80% of scene overlap and less than 30º between the images. [1]
- , f/7.1 aperture; 1/2000s exposition time) , flying at 300 to 380 meters high , overlapping 60% to 80% of the images. [1]
- Thus, the expected error σpriori can be estimated by Equation 1. [1]
- The number of points removed should be 10 to 20% of the data according to Bustos. [1]
- However, as reported by several authors, most accuracy standards for cartographic products do not consider distribution free, where ASPRS. [1]
- 90% of the positional discrepancies must be equal or inferior to the PEC value considering the scale and the class tested and; the RMS of the discrepancies must be equal or inferior to the standard error defined by the norms. [1]
- is the confidence level, which is 10% for this work. [1]
- After the photogrammetry processing the orthomosaic and the 3D model were generated, and the GCPs marked for statistical evaluation were extracted and the discrepancies for E N and h calculated as stated in the prior section. [1]
- In this case, four points were removed from the total of 23 points used for validation, being 17.4% of the data for the h dataset in the slope of the dam. [1]
- In Table 3 we have each discrepancy followed by the decision for the null hypothesis with “Y” or “N” according to the median. [1]
- The acceptable values of R according to the Runs test table for the two tailed sequence test for n1 = 11 and n2 = 12 at the significance level of 0.05 should be between 8 and 17. [1]
- In Table 4 we have each discrepancy followed by the decision for the null hypothesis with “Y” or “N” according to the median. [1]
- The nonrejection region according to the Runs test table for the two tailed sequence test for n1 =. [1]
- and h The Chisquare test was applied to verify the classification of the orthomosaic and the DSM according to the PECPCD standard for the classes A, B, C and D of the scales 1 2,000 and 1 5,000 for E N and 1 10,000 for h, in a level curve of 5 meters. [1]
- Chisquare test for the horizontal accuracy for the classes A, B, C, and D, in scale 1 2,000, according to PEC PCD standard Table 9. [1]
- A, B, C, and D, in scale 1 5,000 according to PECPCD standard The analysis of the horizontal accuracy using the chi square test and RMSEHor must lead to the same result according to Santos et al. [1]
- from this, the orthomosaic fitted in class D of the scale 1 2000, and in the class B of the scale 1 5,000 with at least 90% confidence and 22 degrees of freedom. [1]
- The slope greater than 40% and the checkpoints located in the model’s border resulted in low precision due to the interpolation methods during the photogrammetric reconstruction. [1]
- Chisquare test for the horizontal accuracy for the classes A, B, C, and D, in scale 1 2,000, according to PEC. [1]
- A, B, C, and D, in scale 1 5,000 according to PEC. [1]
- Cisquare test for te elevation accuracy analysis for te classes A, B, C and D, in scale 1 10,000, according to te PEC. [1]
- Chisquare test for the horizontal accuracy for the classes A, B, C, and D, in scale 1 2,000, according to PEC. [1]
- A, B, C, and D, in scale 1 5,000 according to PEC. [1]
- Cisquare test for te elevation accuracy analysis for te classes A, B, C and D, in scale 1 10,000, according to te PEC. [1]
- When this new model was used to simulate Room D’s closure, it under predicted the horizontal and vertical closure rates by and , respectively, at 5.7 years after room excavation. [2]
- Simulations using the new M–D model overpredicted the horizontal closure rate by and under predicted the vertical closure rate by at 5.7 years, averaged over three room closure experiments. [2]
- The kinetic energy of fragments ejection comprises 12%∼24% of absorbed energy at strain rate of 69∼100 s 1, and the percentage further increases with increasing strain rates. [2]
- Then, the “95% limits of agreement” method was applied on the sample data and the confidence intervals were established for the limits of agreement derived, so as to ensure validity and statistical significance of the results. [3]
- Achieved accuracy of MLS exceeds the original expectations with respect to the GNSS/IMU positioning accuracy, which is according to the manufacturer RIEGL between 0.02. [4]
- We use more exact approach using critical values of the statistics for significance levels α = 5 % and α = 1 % to stragglers and outliers test in 3D. Export citation and abstractBibTeXRIS. [4]
I know you want to use Photogrammetry Software, thus we made this list of best Photogrammetry Software. We also wrote about how to learn Photogrammetry Software and how to install Photogrammetry Software. Recently we wrote how to uninstall Photogrammetry Software for newbie users. Don’t forgot to check latest Photogrammetry statistics of 2024.
Reference
- bls – https://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/cartographers-and-photogrammetrists.htm.
- tandfonline – https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/22797254.2020.1717998.
- sciencedirect – https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365160921003890.
- ascelibrary – https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0000114.
- iop – https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/609/1/012091.
How Useful is Photogrammetry
One of the key reasons why photogrammetry is so useful is its ability to capture vast amounts of data quickly and accurately. With the advancements in drone technology, it is now possible to capture high-resolution aerial images of large areas in a fraction of the time it would take using traditional surveying methods. This means that projects can be completed faster, more efficiently, and with a higher degree of accuracy. In industries such as construction and urban planning, where time is money and precision is paramount, this can make a significant difference in the success of a project.
Another major advantage of photogrammetry is its versatility. Not only can it be used to create detailed 3D models of terrain and structures, but it can also be used for measurements, inspection, and monitoring. For example, in agriculture, photogrammetry can be used to monitor crop health, track field conditions, and even estimate yields. In archaeology, it can help researchers map and analyze ancient sites without the need for invasive excavation. The possibilities are endless, and the potential benefits are numerous.
Moreover, photogrammetry is a cost-effective solution for many industries. Compared to traditional surveying methods which can be time-consuming and labor-intensive, photogrammetry offers a more efficient and less expensive alternative. With the growing accessibility of drones and other imaging technologies, the barriers to entry for using photogrammetry are decreasing, making it a viable option for small businesses and organizations with limited resources.
Furthermore, photogrammetry has the added advantage of being non-destructive. Unlike some other measurement and mapping techniques which can be invasive or detrimental to the environment, photogrammetry relies on capturing images from a distance, ensuring minimal impact on the surroundings. This makes it an ideal choice for sensitive environments such as archaeological sites, wildlife habitats, and historical landmarks.
In conclusion, photogrammetry is a highly useful and versatile tool that is revolutionizing the way we collect and analyze spatial data. Its ability to capture accurate measurements quickly and cost-effectively, its versatility in applications across industries, and its non-destructive nature make it an indispensable tool for a wide range of projects and scenarios. As technology continues to improve and become more accessible, the potential of photogrammetry will only continue to grow, making it an essential part of modern-day research, development, and planning.
In Conclusion
Be it Photogrammetry benefits statistics, Photogrammetry usage statistics, Photogrammetry productivity statistics, Photogrammetry adoption statistics, Photogrammetry roi statistics, Photogrammetry market statistics, statistics on use of Photogrammetry, Photogrammetry analytics statistics, statistics of companies that use Photogrammetry, statistics small businesses using Photogrammetry, top Photogrammetry systems usa statistics, Photogrammetry software market statistics, statistics dissatisfied with Photogrammetry, statistics of businesses using Photogrammetry, Photogrammetry key statistics, Photogrammetry systems statistics, nonprofit Photogrammetry statistics, Photogrammetry failure statistics, top Photogrammetry statistics, best Photogrammetry statistics, Photogrammetry statistics small business, Photogrammetry statistics 2024, Photogrammetry statistics 2021, Photogrammetry statistics 2024 you will find all from this page. 🙂
We tried our best to provide all the Photogrammetry statistics on this page. Please comment below and share your opinion if we missed any Photogrammetry statistics.