Voting Management Statistics 2024 – Everything You Need to Know

by

Are you looking to add Voting Management to your arsenal of tools? Maybe for your business or personal use only, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to know more about the most important Voting Management statistics of 2024.

My team and I scanned the entire web and collected all the most useful Voting Management stats on this page. You don’t need to check any other resource on the web for any Voting Management statistics. All are here only 🙂

How much of an impact will Voting Management have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your business? Should you invest in Voting Management? We will answer all your Voting Management related questions here.

Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any word. 🙂

Best Voting Management Statistics

☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 45 Voting Management Statistics on this page 🙂

Voting Management Latest Statistics

  • The 2019 American Community Survey estimated there were 54,074,028 people aged 65 and over in the U.S. out of a total population of 328,239,523, or 16.5%. [0]
  • 2,641,538 2,076,826 78.62% 1968 2,725,058 2,348,005 86.16%. [1]
  • 1970 2,684,636 2,043,287 76.11% 1972 3,099,877. [1]
  • 2,962,807 2,044,076 68.99% 1980 3,156,672 2,566,807 81.31% 1982 3,026,868 2,103,780 69.50% 1984 3,253,785 2,595,054 79.75% 1986. [1]
  • 3,213,763 2,424,579 75.44% 1992 3,351,918 2,822,962 84.22% 1994. [1]
  • 3,990,505 2,243,835 56.23% 2008 4,220,322 3,102,995 73.53% 2010. [1]
  • 4,534,974 3,378,801 74.51% 2018 4,574,967 2,752,665 60.17% 2020. [1]
  • 1966 2,641,538 846,094 32.03% 1968 2,591,051. [1]
  • 682,210 26.33% 1970 2,577,111 910,212 35.32% 1972. [1]
  • 3,026,097 1,330,727 43.98% 1984 3,054,129 711,171 23.29% 1988 2,965,272 975,106 32.88% 1992 3,130,272 1,086,359 34.70% 1996. [1]
  • * Note that the voter counts reflected above do include a small percentage of voters who are under 18 at present, but may be eligible to vote by the next election. [2]
  • Proposals related to social and environmental policies of corporations received, on average, the support of just 25.7 percent of votes cast at general meetings. [3]
  • For resolutions on political contribution disclosure and lobbying, the 28 percent for votes of 2018 represented an uptick from the 24.6 percent in 2017 and the 24 percent in 2015. [3]
  • Resolutions on human rights went from 10.7 percent in 2017 to 17.5 percent in 2018. [3]
  • Health issue related resolutions received the support of 21.4 percent of votes cast in 2018, up from 18.8 percent in 2017 and only 6.1 percent in 2015. [3]
  • In 2018, shareholder proposal volume decreased 8.9 percent in the Russell 3000 and 11.6 percent in the S&P 500. [3]
  • Compared to the same examined period exactly 10 years ago, the number of investor sponsored resolutions submitted in 2018 is down more than 30 percent in both indexes. [3]
  • During the 2018 proxy season, hedge funds submitted only 18 proposals , down from 28 in 2017 and 39 in 2014. [3]
  • There were only 45 resolutions filed by this type of proponent in 2018 , down from the 80 resolutions of 2015. [3]
  • This means that, in total, proposal volume by labor affiliated funds dropped 70.2 percent from 2010 levels, a phenomenon that is partially responsible for the lower aggregate volume of shareholder proposals recorded in 2018. [3]
  • However, in 2018, 23 of the 71 withdrawn proposals were sponsored by investment advisers , for which the decision to drop the request was likely the result of private discussions or settlements with management. [3]
  • The percentage of voted shareholder proposals receiving majority support has inexorably declined since 2009, from more than 20 percent to less than 11.2 percent in the Russell 3000 sample and from 17.3 percent to 8 percent in the S&P 500. [3]
  • In the examined 2018 general meeting period, on average, more than 70 percent of votes on shareholder proposals submitted by other stakeholders, other institutions, and religious groups were against the proposal. [3]
  • The highest level of votes for was observed for proposals by public pension funds , individuals , and hedge funds. [3]
  • Public pension funds and individuals had the highest percentage of voted proposals receiving majority support. [3]
  • The average support level for all corporate governance proposals in 2018 was 37.5 percent. [3]
  • Even though their average support level was below the majority threshold, resolutions on the shareholders’ ability to act by written consent and to call special meetings received 41.9 percent and 40.9 percent of for votes, respectively, in 2018. [3]
  • Among others that passed, a proposal submitted by William Steiner at Nuance Communications received the support of 92.37 percent of votes cast. [3]
  • The lowest level of support was recorded for proposals to introduce terms limits for directors, to allow cumulative voting , and to increase the size of the board of directors. [3]
  • The only voted proposal to adopt term limits for board members, which William Steiner filed at real estate construction firm Lennar Corporation, received only 1.1 percent of votes cast. [3]
  • This compares with 28 companies that failed those votes during the same period in 2017 and, according to an earlier edition of this study, 51, 47, and 51 companies that failed those votes during the same period in 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. [3]
  • This finding is in line with the 5.6 percent of companies with votes under 70 percent seen during the same period in 2017. [3]
  • Moreover, 19 of the companies below the 70 percent support threshold in 2018 were below that level in 2017. [3]
  • In the first half of 2018, activist investors announced 254 campaigns against Russell 3000 companies, compared to 240 in the same period in 2017. [3]
  • The vast majority of such contests were motivated by an attempt to gain a seat on the board of directors. [3]
  • Six fights sought to obtain control of the board to foster a broader range of strategic, organizational, and governance changes, whereas the others were waged to oppose a merger . [3]
  • By the same token, in 2018 the outright success rate by dissidents was the lowest recorded by The Conference Board since 2010, where dissidents won only one of the 23 proxy contests mounted then against Russell 3000 companies. [3]
  • In the Russell 3000, dissidents scored an outright win in only 2 of the 34 proxy contests where an outcome was reached in 2018, down from a percentage of 17.9 in the same period of 2017 and of 12.5 in 2015. [3]
  • By way of comparison, according to an earlier edition of this study, dissidents succeeded in 7 of the 41 of the proxy contests held during the same period in 2014 and in 5 out of the 35 proxy contests of 2013. [3]
  • In 2018, three contests were withdrawn and eight resulted in a victory for management. [3]
  • By way of comparison, in 2014, 31 of the 35 filed proposals on the election of a dissident’s nominee were voted at Russell 3000 AGMs. [3]
  • All but three of the proposals submitted by the top six most frequent sponsors went to a vote, accounting for 88 percent of the total voted. [3]
  • The 2018 average support rate for this proposal topic has increased to 43.2 percent of shares outstanding. [3]
  • Among resolutions on this topic, the highest support level was received by a proposal filed at SandRidge Energy by Carl C. Icahn. [3]
  • The lowest support level was on a proposal filed at The E.W. Scripps Company. [3]

I know you want to use Voting Management Software, thus we made this list of best Voting Management Software. We also wrote about how to learn Voting Management Software and how to install Voting Management Software. Recently we wrote how to uninstall Voting Management Software for newbie users. Don’t forgot to check latest Voting Management statistics of 2024.

Reference

  1. census – https://www.census.gov/topics/public-sector/voting.html.
  2. state – https://www.sec.state.ma.us/ele/elevoterturnoutstats/voterturnoutstats.htm.
  3. bouldercounty – https://www.bouldercounty.org/elections/maps-and-data/voter-registration-statistics/.
  4. harvard – https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/11/26/shareholder-voting-in-the-united-states-trends-and-statistics-on-the-2015-2018-proxy-season/.

How Useful is Voting Management

One of the key functions of voting management is voter registration. This process ensures that only eligible individuals are allowed to vote, thus preventing fraud and maintaining the integrity of the electoral system. By verifying the identity and eligibility of voters, voting management helps to safeguard the sanctity of the voting process.

In addition to voter registration, voting management also includes the allocation of polling stations and the distribution of ballot papers. Ensuring that polling stations are conveniently located and adequately staffed helps to facilitate the voting process and allows more people to participate in elections. Likewise, proper distribution of ballot papers is essential for preventing fraud and ensuring the accuracy of the vote count.

Another important aspect of voting management is the maintenance of voter lists. By regularly updating and verifying voter lists, election officials can ensure that only eligible individuals are included and that duplicate or deceased voters are removed. This helps to prevent voter fraud and ensures that elections are conducted fairly and accurately.

Ballot counting is perhaps the most critical aspect of voting management. The accurate and transparent counting of votes is essential for determining the outcome of elections and instilling confidence in the electoral process. By following strict procedures and guidelines, election officials can ensure that votes are counted correctly and that the results are valid.

Overall, voting management is an indispensable tool for upholding the principles of democracy and ensuring that elections are conducted in a fair and impartial manner. Without proper voting management, the integrity of the electoral process would be compromised, and the results of elections would be called into question.

While voting management is essential, it is not without its challenges. In many countries, there are issues such as voter suppression, inadequate resources, and lack of transparency that can hinder the effectiveness of voting management. Addressing these challenges is crucial for safeguarding the integrity of elections and upholding the democratic rights of citizens.

In conclusion, voting management is a critical component of any democratic society. From voter registration to ballot counting, it encompasses a range of processes and procedures that are essential for the smooth functioning of elections. By ensuring that elections are fair, transparent, and reflective of the will of the people, voting management plays a key role in upholding the integrity of the electoral process.

In Conclusion

Be it Voting Management benefits statistics, Voting Management usage statistics, Voting Management productivity statistics, Voting Management adoption statistics, Voting Management roi statistics, Voting Management market statistics, statistics on use of Voting Management, Voting Management analytics statistics, statistics of companies that use Voting Management, statistics small businesses using Voting Management, top Voting Management systems usa statistics, Voting Management software market statistics, statistics dissatisfied with Voting Management, statistics of businesses using Voting Management, Voting Management key statistics, Voting Management systems statistics, nonprofit Voting Management statistics, Voting Management failure statistics, top Voting Management statistics, best Voting Management statistics, Voting Management statistics small business, Voting Management statistics 2024, Voting Management statistics 2021, Voting Management statistics 2024 you will find all from this page. 🙂

We tried our best to provide all the Voting Management statistics on this page. Please comment below and share your opinion if we missed any Voting Management statistics.

Leave a Comment