Are you looking to add Vulnerability Scanner to your arsenal of tools? Maybe for your business or personal use only, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to know more about the most important Vulnerability Scanner statistics of 2024.
My team and I scanned the entire web and collected all the most useful Vulnerability Scanner stats on this page. You don’t need to check any other resource on the web for any Vulnerability Scanner statistics. All are here only đ
How much of an impact will Vulnerability Scanner have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your business? Should you invest in Vulnerability Scanner? We will answer all your Vulnerability Scanner related questions here.
Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any word. đ
On this page, you’ll learn about the following:
Best Vulnerability Scanner Statistics
â° Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 127 Vulnerability Scanner Statistics on this page đVulnerability Scanner Software Statistics
- 76% of all applications have at least one vulnerability 1 in 5 organizations do not test their software for security flaws. [0]
- The study showed that only 24% of software contains one or more high. [0]
- advertising organizations showed that 84% of firms had high risk vulnerabilities existing on their perimeter devices and software. [0]
- Out of date software accounts for approximately 5% of all security issues. [1]
- In a 2019 Forrester Research survey, 42% of organizations that had experienced an external attack blamed the incident on a software security flaw, and 35% said it had resulted from a buggy web application. [2]
- The State of Application Security 2020, Forrester Research 37% Percentage of security pros that plan to implement container security during development About 20% of security professionals plan to implement container security during software design. [2]
- However, 39% of firms surveyed still plan on doing software composition analysis only during the testing phase, where remediation is much harder. [2]
- 94% are now using some form of advancedDLP softwareto protect sensitive data. [3]
Vulnerability Scanner Latest Statistics
- It found that 50 percent of internal application vulnerabilities are considered high or critical risk. [4]
- It also found that 32 percent of vulnerabilities in internet facing applications are considered high or critical risk. [4]
- Smaller companies with 100 employees or fewer saw the lowest portion of medium, high, or critical. [4]
- According to Edgescan, the average time taken to remediate internet facing vulnerabilities was 60.3 days. [4]
- According to CVE Details, out of roughly 169,000 vulnerabilities, more than 19,000 have a CVSS score of 9.0â10.0. [4]
- That said, the vast majority have a score between 4.0 and 8.0. [4]
- According to the Check Point Cyber Security Report 2021, three out of four attacks took advantage of flaws that were reported in 2017 or earlier. [4]
- And 18 percent of attacks utilized vulnerabilities that were disclosed in 2013 or before, making them at least seven years old. [4]
- According to Check Point, the number of attacks exploiting vulnerabilities in remote access products increased substantially in 2020. [4]
- Citrix attack numbers increased more than 20 fold, while Cisco, VPN, and RDP attacks increased by 41%, 610%, and 85%, respectively. [4]
- Another study from Positive Technologies uncovered the alarming statistic that 84 percent of companies have high risk vulnerabilities on their external networks. [4]
- Positive Technologies also found that 26 percent of companies remain vulnerable to the WannaCry ransomware as they have not yet patched the vulnerability it exploits. [4]
- A report published by Palo Alto Networks in August 2020 found that 80 percent of studied exploits were made public before their related CVEs had even been published. [4]
- Q3 2021 tells us that in JulySeptember 2021, zeroday malware accounted for over two thirds of all threats (67.2%). [4]
- According to RiskBased Securityâs 2020 Year End Report, Microsoft saw a huge increase in the number of detected vulnerabilities with the figure rising by 67 percent in 2020 compared to the previous year. [4]
- Veracodeâs State of Software Security Report Volume 11 released in October 2020 found that more than three quarters of applications have security flaws. [4]
- That said, only 24 percent of those are considered to have high. [4]
- A fairly alarming finding from the Veracode report is that after a year and a half, around 25 percent of flaws are still open. [4]
- Those with 260+ scans per day remediated 50 percent of flaws within 62 days. [4]
- According to a 2019 Ponemon Institute Vulnerability Survey â60% of breach victims said they were breached due to an unpatched known vulnerability where the patch was not applied.â. [4]
- However, an even higher portion claimed they werenât aware of vulnerabilities in their organizations prior to a breach. [4]
- One estimate shows that cyber losses are up by 50% in the last year and numbers are mounting. [0]
- The recent State of Software Security report from Veracode shows that 76% of all applications have at least one vulnerability. [0]
- According to a study of attacks across the first half of 2020, approximately 80% of the observed attacks utilized vulnerabilities reported and registered in 2017 and earlier. [0]
- The SOSS report found that when researchers track progress at organizations in mitigating vulnerabilities found through security testing, that approximately 73% of flaws are closed or remediated between the first and last scan conducted by the organization. [0]
- Meantime, amid the remaining 27% of open flaws, half of them have been open for 216 days and counting. [0]
- Further, 58% had such vulnerabilities for which there exist publicly available exploits. [0]
- A new Ponemon report on application security trends shows that while 56% of organizations now test for security flaws throughout their application development lifecycles, 20% do not do any testing whatsoever. [0]
- For most organizationsâ63% application security testing for flaws usually encompass a combination of different methodologies. [0]
- According to recent research, 80% of public exploits are developed and released before a CVE is published for a targeted vulnerability. [0]
- Among those exploits published after CVE release, 50% were published within the first month of that release. [0]
- Zero day malware attack attempts hit organizations more than 10 million times in just that quarter, representing a 12% increase over the previous quarter. [0]
- At the midway point of the year, Risk Based Security reported that the number vulnerability disclosures for Microsoft in Q2 alone was 150% higher than for all of 2019. [0]
- To start off with, 50,489 (32.18%). [1]
- An interesting fact is that out of the 156,904 vulnerabilities Netsparker identified, 30,164 (19.2%). [1]
- And around 80.8% of all the identified vulnerabilities have been confirmed automatically with the Proof Based Scanningâ˘, which means they are definitely not false positives. [1]
- So by automatically verifying 80% of the identified vulnerabilities, Netsparker is helping businesses save days and weeks of man hours, thus allowing small teams to do much more and ensure the security of their web applications with much less resources. [1]
- Netsparker detected 3,441 SQL injection vulnerabilities, which make up just over 2% of the whole. [1]
- Process types included debris flows (28.7%), hyperconcentrated flows (49.2%), flooding with bedload transport (21.8%), and floods (0.3%). [5]
- Due to the considerable amount of unconsolidated material and to the steep gradient of 30â40%, the catchment is susceptible to erosion processes, in particular debris flows. [5]
- In SaTScan the MSCS can be chosen arbitrarily up to 50% of all cases by the analyst. [5]
- This challenge was approached by scanning for several different MSCSs (20, 30, 40, and 50%). [5]
- Consequently, we analysed our data with a MSCS of 50% according to a suggestion of Kulldorff. [5]
- The size of the circular shaped scanning window was variable up to a maximum of 50% of all cases observed on each individual torrent fan. [5]
- We scanned for areas of such larger or smaller means of the damage ratio with the size of the circular shaped scanning window being variable up to a maximum of 50% of all cases observed on each individual torrent fan. [5]
- By using a 50% scanning window, which included a maximum spatial cluster size of 50% of all cases, only in two catchments a significant most likely cluster was detected. [5]
- The cluster of high values included 11 uildings , and the cluster of low values included 14 uildings .In the Stuenach study area, clusters with high or low values were detected. [5]
- The cluster of high values included 7 buildings. [5]
- 3, 4a, b), their most likely cluster locations mainly coincided. [5]
- The cluster of high values included 11 buildings , and the cluster of low values included 14 buildings. [5]
- For the event of 1995, the cluster of high values included 5 buildings and the cluster of low values included 2 buildings. [5]
- The cluster of high values included 9 buildings , and the cluster of low values included 19 buildings. [5]
- Unauthorized access to applications is possible on 39 percent of sites. [6]
- In 2019, full control of the system could be obtained on 16 percent of web applications. [6]
- On 8 percent of systems, full control of the web application server allowed attacking the local network. [6]
- Breaches of sensitive data were a threat in 68 percent of web applications. [6]
- Most breachable data was of a personal nature (47% of breaches) or credentials (31%). [6]
- 82 percent of vulnerabilities were located in application code. [6]
- The percentage of web applications containing high risk vulnerabilities in 2019 fell significantly, by 17 percentage points compared to the prior year. [6]
- Broken Authentication was found in 45 percent of web applications. [6]
- In almost half of all breaches (47%). [6]
- User credentials figured prominently as well (31%). [6]
- In 16% of web applications, it is possible to gain full controlAttacks on LAN resources are possible In 8% of web applications. [6]
- In 16 percent of web applications, severe vulnerabilities allowed taking control of both the application and the server OS. [6]
- The percentage of production systems with high risk vulnerabilities declined 45 percent in 2019 compared to 71 percent in 2018. [6]
- But this is still higher than in 2017, when the equivalent figure was 25 percent. [6]
- The percentage of apps with high risk vulnerabilities was 56 percent. [6]
- In 2019, production systems made up exactly 50 percent of all tested apps. [6]
- The average number of such vulnerabilities per application has fallen by a third compared to 2018. [6]
- Most Common Discovered CVEs in 2021 7%. [7]
- 4% 4% CVE Dispersion and Clustering 35% 20% 3% Attack Surface. [7]
- The number, which covers apps from 249 vendors, represents a 22.3% decrease from 2018 and a 33.3% decrease from the 19,954 vulnerabilities detected in 2017. [2]
- According to the report, “Analysis suggests that the count of vulnerabilities disclosed in Q1 2020 may rise to 6,126 as further information comes to light, but will still represent a decline.”. [2]
- The number of remotely exploitable flaws as a percentage of all flaws increased by 5.3% between 2018 and 2019. [2]
- At the same time, flaws that could only be exploited on the local network decreased to 30.6% in 2019 from 33% in 2018. [2]
- Other common vulnerabilities include cross site scripting errors (19%), PHP vulnerabilities (16%), remote code execution (7%), and sensitive file disclosure flaws (5%). [2]
- The number represented a 12% increase over the 49% of tested applications with similar vulnerabilities in 2018. [2]
- Nearly all of the attacks (99%). [2]
- Some 63% of the websites had vulnerabilities that were classified as being of medium severity. [2]
- Though the number of sites with cross site request forgery flaws in them remains high, this year’s number is 51% smaller than 2019’s. [2]
- Other vulnerabilities present in a high percentage of websites include cross site scripting errors (25%) and vulnerable JavaScript libraries (24%). [2]
- For example, though applications overall had an average of 12 SQL injection errors in them, the vulnerabilities existed only in 9% of tested applications. [2]
- Percentage of application security vulnerabilities stemming from embeddable opensource and third party components Between 2018 and 2019 alone, there was a 50% increase in unpatched library vulnerabilities. [2]
- Out of 1,253 commercial codebases analyzed, a full 100% contained open source code in nine of the 17 industries looked at. [2]
- 2020 Open Source Security and Risk Analysis Report, Synopsys Nearly half (49%). [2]
- Furthermore, 82% had open source components in them that were more than four years out of date, and 88% of the components had no development activity in at least two years. [2]
- This number represents a 49% increase from the 298 open source components per codebase in 2018. [2]
- While the percentage of codebases containing open source is nearing 100%, there has also been a dramatic, ongoing increase over the same period of the percentage of codebases comprising open source.”. [2]
- 2020 Open Source Security and Risk Analysis Report, Synopsys 50%. [2]
- For organizations that have implemented a mature DevSecOps approach, the average number of apps that are always vulnerable to attack is 22%. [2]
- more, 77% of the respondents to this 2019 survey of 1,310 IT decision makers said similar communication was necessary between developers, operations, and security; 34% said the siloed nature of these functions makes it harder to create a DevOps culture. [2]
- In the same survey of IT decision makers, 61% said it is important to foster greater integration between the different teams, and 50% said it is important to share learning experience across the different teams. [2]
- Over the next two years, 68% of organizations plan to use DevSecOps practices to secure a majority of their cloud applications. [2]
- Security for DevOps Enterprise Survey Report, Enterprise Strategy Group 37% Percentage of respondents who said API security is their top priority for cloud. [2]
- About half of these organizations said they planned to merge these responsibilities with other teams in future; 32% plan on retaining a separate team for cloud application security. [2]
- Security for DevOps Enterprise Survey Report, Enterprise Strategy Group 83%. [2]
- The two other most common flaws uncovered during an initial scan were cryptographic vulnerabilities (62%) and CRLF injection (61%). [2]
- Report author Edgescan also said, “On average 67.8% of assets had at least one CVE with a CVSS score of 4.0 or more. [2]
- From a PCI DSS standpoint, this would result in an average of 67.8% of assets failing PCI compliance.”. [2]
- Percentage of security pros who hadn’t patched their web application frameworks at all over the past 12 months Nearly six in 10 (59%). [2]
- But 38% said they didn’t use a WAF because they don’t process sensitive information via their web apps. [2]
- 32% Percentage of security decision makers that implemented IAST in their dev environment in 2019. [2]
- Some 35% implement dynamic application security testing during the development phase. [2]
- Over the next 12 months, more decision makers (39%) plan to implement interactive application security testing in development compared to DAST (34%). [2]
- The State of Application Security 2020, Forrester Research 37% Percentage of organizations that plan to do SCA during development to reduce risk from vulnerable open. [2]
- 16% of healthcare providers report having âfully functionalâ security programs. [3]
- 43% say that they are either still developing security programs or have not developed one. [3]
- 82% of surveyed healthcare organizations say that security is a top concern. [3]
- 69% of those in the healthcare industry believe they are at risk for a data breach. [3]
- 89% of healthcare organization had patient data lost or stolen in the past two years. [3]
- 93% of healthcare organizations are currently using some form of cloud services. [3]
- 63% plan to use multiple cloud vendors. [3]
- 25% of healthcare organizations using the public cloud report that they are not encrypting patient data. [3]
- The healthcare industry was the victim of88% of all ransomware attacks in US industries in 2016. [3]
- 20% of healthcare domain emails were fraudulent in 2017. [3]
- Healthcare organizations were targeted 473% more often in Q4 2018 vs Q1 2017. [3]
- 54% of healthcare business associates say their top vulnerability is tied to employee negligence in handling patient information. [3]
- 81% of healthcare cyber security incidents are rooted in employee negligence. [3]
- 69% of healthcare organizations cite negligent or careless employees as their top worry for security incidents, followed by cyber attacks (45%) and insecure mobile devices (30%). [3]
I know you want to use Vulnerability Scanner Software, thus we made this list of best Vulnerability Scanner Software. We also wrote about how to learn Vulnerability Scanner Software and how to install Vulnerability Scanner Software. Recently we wrote how to uninstall Vulnerability Scanner Software for newbie users. Donât forgot to check latest Vulnerability Scanner statistics of 2024.
Reference
- bitdefender – https://businessinsights.bitdefender.com/10-stats-on-the-state-of-vulnerabilities-and-exploits.
- invicti – https://www.invicti.com/blog/web-security/netsparker-web-security-scan-statistics-2018/.
- techbeacon – https://techbeacon.com/security/30-app-sec-stats-matter.
- purplesec – https://purplesec.us/cyber-security-healthcare-statistics/.
- comparitech – https://www.comparitech.com/blog/information-security/cybersecurity-vulnerability-statistics/.
- springer – https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11069-011-0081-5.
- ptsecurity – https://www.ptsecurity.com/ww-en/analytics/web-vulnerabilities-2020/.
- edgescan – https://www.edgescan.com/2024-vulnerability-statistics-report-lp/.
How Useful is Vulnerability Scanner
A vulnerability scanner is a software application designed to identify weaknesses in a computer system, network, or application. By scanning for known vulnerabilities and misconfigurations, these tools help organizations proactively detect and fix security issues before they can be exploited by malicious actors. Vulnerability scanners work by comparing the system under test to a database of known vulnerabilities, identifying potential weaknesses that could potentially be exploited by hackers.
One of the primary benefits of vulnerability scanners is their ability to automate the process of identifying security vulnerabilities. Instead of relying on manual vulnerability assessments, which can be time-consuming and error-prone, organizations can use vulnerability scanners to scan their systems quickly and efficiently. This allows security teams to focus their efforts on fixing identified vulnerabilities rather than wasting time on manual detection.
Furthermore, vulnerability scanners provide organizations with a comprehensive overview of their security posture. By conducting regular vulnerability scans, businesses can gain insights into the weaknesses present in their systems and prioritize remediation efforts accordingly. This proactive approach to cybersecurity can help organizations stay one step ahead of potential threats and reduce the likelihood of suffering a data breach.
Vulnerability scanners are also useful for compliance purposes. Many industry regulations and standards, such as PCI DSS and HIPAA, require organizations to regularly scan their systems for vulnerabilities and take remedial action. By using vulnerability scanners, businesses can ensure that they remain in compliance with these regulations and avoid costly fines or penalties.
Moreover, vulnerability scanners can help organizations reduce their risk exposure. By identifying and patching vulnerabilities in a timely manner, businesses can minimize the likelihood of falling victim to cyber attacks. This proactive approach to cybersecurity can help organizations safeguard their reputation, protect sensitive data, and avoid the financial losses associated with data breaches.
While vulnerability scanners are undoubtedly a valuable tool in the fight against cyber threats, it is important to note that they are not a panacea. Vulnerability scanners are only as effective as the security measures put in place to address the vulnerabilities they identify. Organizations must have robust cybersecurity policies and procedures in place to ensure that identified vulnerabilities are patched promptly and effectively.
In conclusion, vulnerability scanners are an essential tool in the cybersecurity toolkit. By automating the process of identifying security vulnerabilities, providing organizations with a comprehensive overview of their security posture, and helping businesses stay in compliance with industry regulations, vulnerability scanners play a crucial role in securing systems and networks against cyber attacks. Organizations that leverage vulnerability scanners as part of their overall cybersecurity strategy are better equipped to protect themselves from the ever-evolving threat landscape.
In Conclusion
Be it Vulnerability Scanner benefits statistics, Vulnerability Scanner usage statistics, Vulnerability Scanner productivity statistics, Vulnerability Scanner adoption statistics, Vulnerability Scanner roi statistics, Vulnerability Scanner market statistics, statistics on use of Vulnerability Scanner, Vulnerability Scanner analytics statistics, statistics of companies that use Vulnerability Scanner, statistics small businesses using Vulnerability Scanner, top Vulnerability Scanner systems usa statistics, Vulnerability Scanner software market statistics, statistics dissatisfied with Vulnerability Scanner, statistics of businesses using Vulnerability Scanner, Vulnerability Scanner key statistics, Vulnerability Scanner systems statistics, nonprofit Vulnerability Scanner statistics, Vulnerability Scanner failure statistics, top Vulnerability Scanner statistics, best Vulnerability Scanner statistics, Vulnerability Scanner statistics small business, Vulnerability Scanner statistics 2024, Vulnerability Scanner statistics 2021, Vulnerability Scanner statistics 2024 you will find all from this page. đ
We tried our best to provide all the Vulnerability Scanner statistics on this page. Please comment below and share your opinion if we missed any Vulnerability Scanner statistics.