Are you looking to add Secure Code Review to your arsenal of tools? Maybe for your business or personal use only, whatever it is – it’s always a good idea to know more about the most important Secure Code Review statistics of 2024.
My team and I scanned the entire web and collected all the most useful Secure Code Review stats on this page. You don’t need to check any other resource on the web for any Secure Code Review statistics. All are here only 🙂
How much of an impact will Secure Code Review have on your day-to-day? or the day-to-day of your business? Should you invest in Secure Code Review? We will answer all your Secure Code Review related questions here.
Please read the page carefully and don’t miss any word. 🙂
On this page, you’ll learn about the following:
Best Secure Code Review Statistics☰ Use “CTRL+F” to quickly find statistics. There are total 35 Secure Code Review Statistics on this page 🙂
Secure Code Review Software Statistics
- In its 2020 State of the Software Supply Chain report, opensource governance company Sonatype noted a 430% yearoveryear growth in attacks targeting open.
- A Sonatype survey of 679 software development professionals revealed that only 17% of organizations learn about open source vulnerabilities within a day of public disclosure.
- In the Java ecosystem, developers downloaded 226 billion open source software components from the Maven Central Repository in 2019, which was a 55% increase compared to 2018.
- A further analysis of 1,700 enterprise applications revealed that on average they contained 135 third party software components, of which 90% were open source.
Secure Code Review Latest Statistics
- This tool uses binary code/bytecode and hence ensures 100% test coverage.
- A key strength of SAST tools is the ability to analyze 100% of the codebase.
- Penalties can amount up to €20 million or 4% of the business’s total annual worldwide turnover.
- In 77 percent of external penetration tests, we found vulnerabilities that attackers could use to obtain access to a company’s internal network.1.
- 26 percent of all cyberincidents in Q3 2017 involved attacks on web applications.2.
- 85 percent of the web applications had vulnerabilities that allow attacks against users.
- In 75 percent of e commerce web applications, assessment revealed vulnerabilities enabling denial of service.
- The majority of these vulnerabilities were of medium severity (65%).
- By taking advantage of these vulnerabilities, an attacker could obtain unauthorized access to sensitive information on a server (61%) or database (46%), run arbitrary OS commands on a server (55%), and delete or modify files (42%).
- 85 percent of the web applications contained vulnerabilities that allow attacks against users.
- 80 percent of the web applications for financial institutions were vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting, and almost half of them to HTTP Response Splitting.
- These vulnerabilities are a primary factor in why 87 percent of applications allowed attacks on web application users.
- Static analysis source code testing is adequate for understanding security issues within program code and can usually pick up about 85% of the flaws in the code.
- Dynamic code reviews, presented with a wide range of inputs and security tests, will generally pick up about 85% of the flaws present in the code.
- Combining both types of code review should pick up about 95% of the flaws, provided the reviews are done by someone able to understand the source code during static analysis, and that the range of tests for dynamic analysis is sufficiently wide.
- Errorfcalls and reports calls that contain a verb directive that is different than the new %w verb directive introduced in Go v1.13.
- PHP Coding Standards Fixer— Fixes your code according to standards like PSR1, PSR 2, and the Symfony standard.
- The most often cited reasons were meeting a critical deadline, the vulnerabilities being low risk or the issues being discovered too late in the release cycle (45%).
- In 28% of organizations the decision is taken by the development manager together with a security analyst, in 24% by the development manager alone and in 21% by a security analyst.
- Sixty percent of respondents admitted that their production applications were exploited through vulnerabilities listed in the OWASP Top 10 over the past 12 months.
- that assist with security issue identification and resolution (29%), scanning tools for images used in containers, repositories and microservices (29%), fuzzing tools (16%) and container runtime configuration security tools (15%).
- This is why in only 19% of organizations the application security testing task is formally owned by individual developers and in 26% by development managers.
- A third of organizations still have this task assigned to dedicated security analysts and in another 29% it’s jointly owned by the development and security teams.
- In a third of organizations less than half of developers are required to take formal security training and in only 15% of organizations is such training required for all developers.
- Less than half of organizations require developers to engage in formal security training more than once a year, with 16% expecting developers to self educate and 20% only offering training when a developer joins the team.
- Only 40% of organizations track security issue introduction and continuous improvement metrics for development teams or individual developers.
- Almost half of respondents in ESG’s survey said that opensource components make up over 50% of their code base and 8% said two thirds of their code is comprised of open.
- Despite that, only 48% of organizations have invested in controls to deal with open.
- According to the company, between February 2015 and June 2019, 216 such “next generation” supply chain attacks were reported, but from July 2019 to May 2020 an additional 929 attacks were documented, so this has become a very popular attack vector.
- It’s concerning that the University of Darmstadt research published last year revealed that nearly 40% of all npm packages contain or depend code with known vulnerabilities and that 66% vulnerabilities in npm packages remain unpatched.
- Eleven percent of those open source components had at least one vulnerability, but applications had on average 38 known vulnerabilities inherited from such components.
I know you want to use Secure Code Review Software, thus we made this list of best Secure Code Review Software. We also wrote about how to learn Secure Code Review Software and how to install Secure Code Review Software. Recently we wrote how to uninstall Secure Code Review Software for newbie users. Don’t forgot to check latest Secure Code Review statistics of 2024.
- csoonline – .
- softwaretestinghelp – .
- synopsys – .
- medium – .
- ptsecurity – .
- computerweekly – .
- github – .
How Useful is Secure Code Review
First and foremost, secure code review serves as a formidable defense against potential vulnerabilities and exploitations. By examining the source code line by line, expert reviewers can identify coding errors, loopholes, and other weaknesses that could potentially be targeted by malicious hackers. Additionally, code review helps to ensure compliance with industry regulations and best-practices, thus minimizing legal and reputational risks for organizations.
Moreover, secure code review acts as a valuable educational tool for developers, enabling them to learn from their past mistakes and improve their overall coding skills. By providing developers with constructive feedback and recommendations, code review serves to enhance their understanding of secure coding practices. As a result, developers become more proficient in writing robust, secure code in future projects, thereby reducing the likelihood of introducing vulnerabilities at the source.
Furthermore, code review facilitates effective collaboration among teams. During the review process, developers have the opportunity to exchange ideas, share knowledge, and engage in discussions about potential security risks. This collaborative approach enhances teamwork and enables individuals to mentor each other, fostering continuous learning and growth within the organization.
While automated tools can aid in identifying certain vulnerabilities in the code, they cannot replace the human insight and expertise that secure code review provides. Automated tools, although helpful, often lack the nuanced understanding and context that a human reviewer possesses. A skilled reviewer is not just concerned with spotting glaring errors but also can critically assess the underlying logic and design, improving the overall quality and efficiency of the code.
Moreover, secure code review is an invaluable asset throughout the software development life cycle, from the initial design phase to the final deployment. Conducting frequent reviews allows organizations to detect and rectify potential vulnerabilities early on, preventing them from proliferating into larger issues later in the development process when they become significantly costlier to fix. By taking a proactive stance towards security, organizations can save both time and resources in the long run.
In conclusion, secure code review plays a vital role in ensuring the integrity and security of software. It safeguards organizations from potential vulnerabilities, aids in compliance with industry standards, educates developers, fosters collaboration, and can save time and resources in the long term. While it may require additional effort and time from developers, the benefits it provides far outweigh any perceived drawbacks. In an era of increasing cybersecurity threats, organizations cannot afford to overlook the significance and usefulness of secure code review.
Be it Secure Code Review benefits statistics, Secure Code Review usage statistics, Secure Code Review productivity statistics, Secure Code Review adoption statistics, Secure Code Review roi statistics, Secure Code Review market statistics, statistics on use of Secure Code Review, Secure Code Review analytics statistics, statistics of companies that use Secure Code Review, statistics small businesses using Secure Code Review, top Secure Code Review systems usa statistics, Secure Code Review software market statistics, statistics dissatisfied with Secure Code Review, statistics of businesses using Secure Code Review, Secure Code Review key statistics, Secure Code Review systems statistics, nonprofit Secure Code Review statistics, Secure Code Review failure statistics, top Secure Code Review statistics, best Secure Code Review statistics, Secure Code Review statistics small business, Secure Code Review statistics 2024, Secure Code Review statistics 2021, Secure Code Review statistics 2024 you will find all from this page. 🙂
We tried our best to provide all the Secure Code Review statistics on this page. Please comment below and share your opinion if we missed any Secure Code Review statistics.